Hello. I do video filming. For example, like this work
https://youtu.be/obb2Odo9jcg
https://youtu.be/uDHTegyuEc4

On the example of this work and there will be questions.
Rented on a Canon 600d, was not enough sharpness and 60 frames in 1080 (to slow down, if something is not dosnyal) well and AF are lacking, which can be seen on video with the machine, where the distance between the camera and the car is changing rapidly.
So, he wanted something with 4K at 30 frames or 1080 60, with autofocus. And my choice fell on the Canon 250d and Panasonic g7 (can be ordered off store in the same price as the 250d). And then the question arises, such as a wish for all parameters g7, and better suited for video and less noisy and sharper, but at the same time confuses focus xs as the works in the internet is not really clear, there tests mainly on the face. But everywhere asserting that worse than the dual pixel in the canon, despite the fact that in the canon and dual 4k pixel as if not. And it turns out, the choice of what is more important than sharpness or autofocus, but mylnost rastraivaytes 250d, 600d with I namuchalsya with her, especially just getting dark and all the soap.
In general, if there are owners 250d and g7, is interested in whether or 250d much soap, and like autofocus at g7, let's say on The above video could g7 always keep the car out of focus, or there is a chance that would prowl? I understand it would be good 250d seized.
Thanks in advance for the answers.

Maybe someone will offer more options in the price of 40-45k.

Saros3600,
About AF in video:
In these models 4K contrast AF, and in G7 will be better (although in fact there and there he was working with questions and very much depends on the lens).
At the G7 is realistic keeps focus, sometimes fails, but at 250d is the exact same problem in 4Q.
The following two examples c G7:
https://youtu.be/QHt9tV8W_GE
https://youtu.be/IEZiqDDEsAw
It is as bad examples Record was weak lens suitable for video. But even in these conditions, the unit is quite consulted. More questions for installation.
https://youtu.be/Da4AJ4Oz7uw
Here whale. We close our eyes to the installation, stabilization, etc.(Some lazy ass), Sometimes visible work focus, with quite predictable.
And in the office. G7 you will have only 2160 24 | 25 and 1080 24 | 25 | 50

We 250D you will be a plus in the existing lens and AF 1080 (but what is the point to take it when you can take the M50? Perhaps only in the absence of the adapter on the EF-S lenses and save a little on this)
If the determining factor - a good autofocus in 4Q, the M6 ​​Mark 2 promising novelty. Or alternative a6400 / a6500

Personally, my opinion - good fast autofocus and a handy thing, but these rolls that you threw, generally never defines the facts to choose from.
It is important for any blogs or reviews, interviews, where the subject is moving and the need to keep the focus at a certain point all the time.

Post has been editedIce-kiling - 06.01.20, 03:20

Ice-kiling thank you very much for the examples, but is also already looking at m50, expense fps to a wide range, than the 250d. Your video is straight like sharpness, very cool, I wonder whether such a pull 250d or M50, in theory, they should be identical. But r7 definitely less noisy. And so, again, in the same 4k and here and there, a contrast. And since did not use never autofocus, it is not clear whether he I do, maybe even dual pixel will not work like that as we go down, all the examples people, I also really contrary almost no people in the picture, and then do not know that both will work. You have in the third embodiment can be seen as the focus jumps to the busts in the background, but I understand the depth of field at the expense of the matrix r7 great because not so conspicuous. But I usually manually handled quite standards, and then, in principle, even picking the focus is, that would certainly have to be sure that he was the focus. Although at the M50 too.

M6 mark 2 and Sony 6400 pricey for 70-80k, count almost in 2 times.

Post has been editedSaros3600 - 07.01.20, 22:18

Saros3600,
https://youtu.be/SpJHOgIegSU
https://youtu.be/NSujYIwGhGM
Examples M50 kit for recording. Detail, conventionally, with plenty light enough.
On the G7, the whale itself is very sharp, albeit slightly darkish.
About GRIP - the difference with the M50 there will no longer (at comparable lenses).. Whale, according to the sample, lathers lightly.
when recording4K on M50 present crop ~ 2.56x and on G7 ~ 2.4x , So most of the matrix to M50 4K video benefits does not.

Post has been editedIce-kiling - 09.01.20, 13:20