Discussion camera Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Pro)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
What versions GCam use on Redmi note 5? (Can be several options)
5.0 by tigr1234566 [ 6 ] ** [2,61%]
5.1 by Xenius [ 3 ] ** [1,3%]
5.2 by fu24 [ 11 ] ** [4,78%]
5.3 by gdb417 [ 0 ] ** [0%]
6.1 by Alexey_070315 [ 1 ] ** [0,43%]
6.1 by r0m10 [ 3 ] ** [1,3%]
6.2 by tigr1234566 (v.5) [ 11 ] ** [4,78%]
6.3 by marlin-ku [ 4 ] ** [1,74%]
7.0 by Parrot043 [ 14 ] ** [6,09%]
7.2 by Burial [ 5 ] ** [2,17%]
7.3 by The_dise [ 15 ] ** [6,52%]
7.3 by tigr1234566 [ 37 ] ** [16,09%]
7.3 by Parrot043 [ 79 ] ** [34,35%]
7.3 by marlin-ku [ 4 ] ** [1,74%]
7.3 by onFire (Abhi) [ 19 ] ** [8,26%]
Other [ 65 ] ** [28,26%]
What is your main camera?
miui camera [ 60 ] ** [26,09%]
Google camera [ 159 ] ** [69,13%]
Other [ 8 ] ** [3,48%]
Total votes: 230
 



Rep: (286)
Discussion camera Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Pro)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (Pro). Model: MEE7S, MEC7S - kit. Vers .; MEI7S - ind. Vers. Codename: Whyred
Discussion | Purchase | Accessories | Marriage | Firmware
Camera specifications
Chinese version: Indian version:
  • Rear dual camera:
    12 MP, 1.25 μm (f / 2.2 aperture, Sony IMX 486 sensor)
    _5 MP, 1.12 μm (f / 2.0 aperture, Samsung sensor)
  • Front-camera:
    20 MP, 1.0μm (f / 2.2 aperture, Sony IMX 376 sensor)
Technology:
  • PDAF, monochrome flash, face recognition, HDR, Smart Beauty 4.0
Google Camera Mod (Gcam) + MIUI cam
Patches

Important - if you have everything set up correctly, the kernel, firmware and patch correspond to each other, but all the same frontalka Freese, or other features stated in the patch does not work set magisk 20.1 stable in newer versions of patches to many users refuse to work.
Examples of photos and videos
  1. Review of the camera from melox
  2. Comparison of OnePlus 3 and XRN5. Both on gcam.
  3. Comparison of LG V20 vs note 5 (all under gcam)
  4. Comparison of cameras Redmi Note 3 Pro with its 16 MP and Redmi Note 5 with its 12 MP.
  5. Comparison of photos of the flow with GCam. 92 photos with different scenes.
  6. Sample photos from the stock on firmware 9.5.17.0
  7. Stoke, 4/64 global
  8. Sample video 1080p / 60fps in stock camera.
  9. Photos made on Redmi Note 5 Pro (without filters and editing)
  10. Photos taken on camera in the updated firmware (9.2.5.0) + new camera functionality
  11. Examples of pictures taken on Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (China / World)
  12. A few pictures on the stock (9.5.13.0)
  13. Example with and without hdr
  14. An example with a sealed second camera and with two cameras.
  15. Some examples of daytime shooting, shooting against the sun and shooting indoors with good light.
  16. Through Snapdragon Camera, stock can only 1080/30 fps.
  17. Examples of photos stock camera and google camera advanced HDR +
  18. A few examples of photos on the stock camera.
  19. Examples of pictures on 9.5.13.0
  20. Pictures with dim lighting on note5 china, 9.5.6.0 global, gcam hdr + advanced
  21. Comparison of 4K and FHD when recording via Snapdragon Camera (from the header)
  22. Comparison of 4K and FHD when recording via the Open Camera (from the Play Market)
  23. Compare Camera to iPhone 6s
  24. Comparison of cameras Meizu M6 Note, Xiaomi Redmi Note 5, Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus.
  25. Photo comparison Huawei P10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
  26. XIAOMI REDMI NOTE 5 vs IPHONE X
  27. Examples of photos on stock 9.5.19.0
  28. A couple of pictures with editorial and pixel
  29. Comparison of cameras with MI A1, video reviews from Indians
  30. Comparison of night mode stock camera and GCam
Instructions
Archive cameras, settings, patches
The rules of communication in the subject, if you have something does not work
1) indicate what kind of firmware you have
2) what patches are installed
3) did you install custom kernels or were there any other interventions in the system
4) which camera mod was installed (preferably with a link) and how it was done
poll 05/08/2020
Attached Image


Question: "What kind of camera is best for my firmware / kernel / and to the best?" Will be deleted without warning. Stable and working version in a cap + poll popularity versions.

Topics Curator: TheAirKing
With regard to the filling caps communicate with the curator themesQMS

User activity


Post has been editedTheAirKing - 04.07.20, 12:54
Reason for editing: Edit



Rep: (2481)
Ffrom made on Redmi Note 5 Pro (without filters and editing) + one selfie

Here are examples of photos with and without zoom, as well as many others :)

P.S .: Some photos have cockroaches: 3
Neatly :)
A lot of photos!
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


# Cap

Post has been editedbullik01 - 11.03.18, 01:16



Rep: (2481)
PMore about cameras in Redmi Note 5 Pro (in China just Redmi Note 5):

Rear camera:
12 MP, 1.25μm (f / 2.2 aperture, PDAF, monochrome flash, face recognition, HDR, Sony IMX 486 sensor)

Rear camera (optional lens):
5 MP, 1.12μm (f / 2.0 aperture, Samsung sensor)

Front-camera:
20 Mp, 1.0μm (f / 2.2 aperture with soft flash, 1080p, Smart Beauty 4.0, Sony IMX 376 sensor)

# Cap

Post has been editedbullik01 - 11.03.18, 01:19



Rep: (2481)
FMade on camera in the updated firmware (9.2.5.0) + new camera functionality

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


In the new firmware, some bugs were fixed and added the ability to turn on / off the brand's watermark (dual camera, etc.: foto:Attached Image)

# Cap

Post has been editedbullik01 - 11.03.18, 01:20



Rep: (239)
WITHalignment of cameras with MI A1, video reviews from Indians
YouTube / YouTube
In general, everything is not very bad, and in some moments even better! + Pleases electronic stabilization when recording video.

# Cap

Post has been editedLexaun - 11.03.18, 19:43



Rep: (47)
Since there are not so many options for camera modules, we have in the Chinese version:
Main dual camera :
Resolution: 12 Mp + 5 Mp;
Sensor: Sony IMX362 / Samsung 2L7 (Dual Pixel Drive) + Samsung S5K5E8,
Pixel size: 1.4 microns + 1.12 microns;
Aperture: f / 1.9 + f / 2.0;
Front-camera:
Resolution: 13 Mp;
Sensor: Sony IMX258 / Samsung S5K3L8 / OmniVision 13855;
Pixel size: 1.127 microns;
Aperture: f / 2.0;
Probably mistaken - check)
And if you dig around on the Internet, you can quickly find where these camera modules are already standing.


# Cap

Post has been editedbullik01 - 27.03.18, 18:33
Reason for editing: Spelling



Rep: (97)
PExamples of pictures taken on Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 (China / World)



# Cap

Post has been editedbullik01 - 27.03.18, 23:36



Rep: (102)
* sanek8,
CD3S @ 04/04/18 01:48*
I had a Siemens S75 flash there, too, in the camera module, a similar effect from the flash was caused by the SIEMENS S75 because the transparent plastic / glass from which the camera module is made starts to glow from the LED flash and gives the lens illumination.

It may well be that I had similar glares on Note4x when I put on a silicone case, without a cutout between the camera module and the fingerprint scanner also flashed! But with a photo from a distance of no more than half a meter, there is no such effect, in short, you need to understand.

Kisasanya @ 04/04/18, 02:39*
In total darkness with flash

Try to take a picture of a room or object, delete it by a meter and a half.
bojomilk @ 04/04/18, 00:55*
if I understand you correctly, take a picture at the same time, note4 flash, note 5 (off flash), while the photo comes out normal.

And so I also tried it, the norms come out, but I'm a little bit different, Music 5 flash, note 4 flash off, on note 4 with flash from note 5 - the photo rules turn out. This I checked whether the flash output power is enough5.
Well, a little more comparison, in daylight:
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image



Rep: (49)
* hospital,
I do not know how everything listed in the article is implemented on our phone model, but you can readhereandhere
That is, closing the second camera with the hand, and the lack of response to this action, does not indicate uselessness, it’s just an algorithm that imposes additional effects on the load to the main camera when capturing an image.



Rep: (596)
BUT4K video recording

  1. Download and installOpen camera
  2. Go inOpen camera
  3. Go inCamera settings
    Screen
    Attached Image

  4. Further:Video Settings → Video Resolution → 4K Ultra HD
    Screen
    Attached Image

  5. Done! Now you can shoot in 4K!


# Cap

Post has been editedAndrewP_1 - 25.01.19, 14:12



Rep: (92)
hospital @ 04/04/18 05:26*
And who knows what the second camera is for? I just close it and there is no difference, I tried it in portrait mode (with blur) and brought it closer, there is no difference, it feels like it is not connected at all))
You can try to check it differently, on Mi6 it works. Go to the camera ->select manual mode. There should be (I hope) the "Lens" item in which you can switch from "Telephoto Lens" mode to "Wide Angle" and back. When this happens, switching from one camera to another. Example with mi6:
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedsuper.cat - 04.04.18, 10:51



Rep: (102)
* super.cat,
Here in the manual mode only BB and ISO.
And probably you should go to the camera talkXiaomi Redmi Note 5, and that will swear.
Attached Image



Rep: (102)
* Engineer,
But damn it, I say, closed it and took a photo in portrait mode, the same bokeh, here the bokeh is visible in real time by the way, of course the results may differ, but with a cursory glance I did not notice the difference. : search:

Threat I take my words back, tried again, sealed the second camera and with two cameras, which I think is understandable with a sealed one.

Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedhospital - 04.04.18, 13:21



Rep: (102)
* Engineer,
With only two cameras:

Attached Image



Rep: (596)
* Engineer,
Here is what Samsung himself writes about isocell Dual dual camera technology:
http: //www.samsung.com...ll-dual-image-sensors/

Samsung is coupling its refocusing algorithm with a 13 megapixel (Mp) and 5Mp set of image sensors, and its LLS algorithm with a set of two 8Mp sensors, to simplify implementation by OEMs.

It seems that only refocusing works at 13/5. And LLS on 8/8



Rep: (47)
DenH8k @ 04/04/18, 17:46*
It seems that only refocusing works at 13/5. And LLS on 8/8
This article in the Russian translation has such a meaning that in order to simplify life for mid-class smartphones, they developed two 13/5 modules — which is better at working on bokeh / refocus, 8/8 in low light (the pixel size is larger). It's not that one does not make bokeh, but that he does it better.
And I think it's about hybrid modules ...



Rep: (102)
EngineerR @ 04/04/18, 21:35*
"lamp" lighting. Let's test the camera in such conditions with two and one module (take some book text, say from 3 meters)

Crop photo from two meters, lamp lighting:

Attached Image
Attached Image



Rep: (29)
hospital @ 04/04/18, 12:44*
Well, there are strange colors, below an example, with hdr and without

It seems to me alone that the playground is in fog or as if in a haze?



Rep: (102)
* andyback,
I did not test this, I'll try it in the evening.
Below are some more examples of daytime shooting, shooting against the sun and shooting indoors with a good light, all the photos were taken on the move, so to speak. without aiming and trying to create an artistic picture)) Shumodav wildly overwhelms, and without cause.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedhospital - 05.04.18, 09:05



Rep: (21)
* dixyl just the bokeh effect it is suitable maximum in instagram. All schools separate the object from the background are evident at otsmotren on a computer screen, most notably on the hair. Further objects are blurred out of focus at the same rate as opposed to the optical blur - looks unnatural. If still camera stores images from both cameras for subsequent slow processing on the computer - it was still possible to think of something. And so long as the value for me is only the ordinary image without fine with large depth of field, but clear.
By and large, I initially considered the A1 just because of the possibility of zoom, although the image quality of the body relative to the wide-angle module leaves much to be desired, it is still better than the digital zoom.

It's also funny that a module with an EGF of ~ 50mm is considered a tele-module, when it is normal focal - marketing seems to be. And all these 12-20 megapixels do not make much sense, because even the best modules with prots give a picture that creaks to a 2-3mp useful image, i.e. with detail close to pixel-by-pixel. It seems to me that if manufacturers made 5 megapixel arrays using all modern technologies, the result would be much better.

In principle, the Google Camera made a breakthrough, significantly increasing the possibilities of unpretentious modules, increasing both the detailing and the dynamic range, which I saw in A1. But in it the autonomy and some more parameters repels me a little. Therefore, I look in the direction of RN5, whose camera is more likely to be flawed, however it is not as bad as it seemed at first glance and there is hope for the adaptation of the GoogleCamera.
Alternatives to a special device are a little around $ 330. I also considered Mi6, but its maintainability is dubious, and I choose a phone for several years. The rest of the alternatives of the problem are the same + amoled for some.



Rep: (84)
Another strange and unpleasant fact striking in the direct comparison, this is a muddy viewfinder, as if a low-pass filter were pulled to a low resolution. Yes, and it seems the video is the same muddy in the details (in comparison), and therefore perhaps not in the output of turbidity on the viewfinder case, fuzz-disease of this optics, this matrix, this symbiosis. Confirm or disprove.
Although still hope for Gcam. We wait. Anyway, for my price, I consider the normal result for the camera.
Different video reviews have seen direct comparisons of different competitors with the version that Indie then China.
Attached Image


Post has been editedEleman - 05.04.18, 15:21
Reason for editing: Supplement


Full version    

Help     rules

Time is now: 11/07/20, 13:13