Neitar @ 05/15/18 17:38
katya_acid, as well as 3 pages of text: trapishere, Rollygan, Zooui, Alex0498, Gelomen64, hansel7, slaviris, eugeniub, thunderbeat, OGY3OK, you can lose your mind while you read completely opposite comments
no one can be trusted even myself
Opposites for what? As I said from the very beginning, I say this - the residual image is not a marriage. Replacing the phone at katya_acid - the merit of a half-hour trip to the subway with a static picture at maximum brightness for greater clarity. Proof:
Katya_acid @ 05/13/18, 20:00
Super.cat, So I was on the subway for half an hour keeping the suspension open at full brightness. (One chat) and I got so imprinted that you could read the text
The fact that the phone was replaced is a panic and a misunderstanding of what is happening in general with responsible personnel.
Neitar @ 05/15/18 17:38
Are other phones subject to this? Yes, for example. (the first thing that gave google)
Google has helpfully bewildered your comparison of phones with oled and amoled screens. They use a different principle of building an image.
screenshots from official sources
Neitar @ 05/15/18 17:38
Summarize:
Are the matrices subject to fading? - Yes.
Before summarizing please review the subject matter and the ips specification of the displays. Residual image is not equal to fading. Burnout is an irreversible process in contrast to ion polarization.
Post has been editedhansel7 - 15.05.18, 18:53