If you compare the Redmi 4 Pro with the performance of the Galaxy C7, which are built on identical processors, and with FullHD screens, then in AnTuTu Redmi 4 Pro will have to gain the same 60,000 points, despite the fact that it will have 3 GB of RAM, and not 4 GB, like the Galaxy C7.
Regarding the cameras - much depends on the quality of optics, and the matrix. One value of the Lights (F 2.2) is not an indicator. Yes, I would like to have high-alkaline glass 1.7-2.0, but what then manufacturers will insert into their flagships than to prove the advantages than to explain overpayment on XXX bucks for their top solutions? But as for the quality of photographs, I will say that in my budget Xiaomi Redmi 1, as well as the Redmi 1S for $ 120 chambers stand with a luminosity of 2.2 from OmnyVision (not Sony), but at the same time their quality is Lachesh (as when shooting At night, in motion) than in Xiaomi Mi4i for $ 235 with a 5-element chamber and F / 2.0 light (Sony / Samsung). How does this explain that the camera with more dark windows takes pictures better than a camera with lighter stalks? Therefore, not everything here from the lights depends. Yes, and a step of just one (step) from 2.0 to 2.2 - here to move the photosensitivity of the matrix and the chances of light in the chambers will be equal, and if the matrix itself is not slag, then noises will not be noticeable at such a step.
I took it here, and just compared the TTX displays on the Xiaomi Mi4c and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro. There is a difference, in the same color gamut coverage. In Mi4c, it is
95% NTSC , and Redmi 4 Pro has only
72% NTSC which does not add to her a plus, given the fact that their prices are almost identical, but rather, Mi4c is sold cheaper, and gains the same 55,000 points in AnTuTu. Therefore, those who already have Mi4c, I would not advise them to change their smartphone to Redmi 4 Pro.
Post has been editedlawyerhome - 05.11.16, 16:10