Discussion camera Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro



Rep: (3250)
Discussion camera Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro
PictureCamera discussion and sample photos with Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro
Description | Discussion пїЅ | SE talk пїЅ | Official firmware пїЅ | SE Official Firmware пїЅ | Custom firmware пїЅ | Kernels пїЅ | Bootloader unlocking пїЅ | Purchase пїЅ | Accessories пїЅ | Marriage and Repair пїЅ | Modifications and decorations пїЅ | power usage пїЅ | Owners Club пїЅ | Xiaomi Club пїЅ | Camera talkпїЅ


Camera specifications
  • Source for a detailed description of the characteristics

  • Main camera
    • Sensor Model: Samsung S5K3P3
    • Sensor Type: ISOCELL
    • Sensor Size: 4.74 x 3.56 mm
    • Pixel size: 1.029 microns
    • Crop factor: 7.29
    • ISO: 100-1600
    • Diaphragm: F / 2
    • Focal length: 3.5 mm
    • Flash type: Dual LED
    • Image size: 4608 x 3456 (15.93 megapixel)
    • Video resolution: 1920 x 1080 (2.07 megapixel)
    • Frame rate per second: 30 seconds

  • Front-camera
    • Sensor Model: OmniVision OV5670
    • Sensor Type: PureCel
    • Sensor Size: 2.95 x 2.21 mm
    • Pixel size: 1.136 microns
    • Crop factor: 11.74
    • Diaphragm: F / 2
    • Image Resolution: 2592 x 1944 (5.04 megapixel)
    • Video resolution: 1920 x 1080 (2.07 megapixel)
    • Frame rate per second: 30 seconds

Information about the camera module!
  • Samsung S5K3P3 - 16 MP | Camera Module Description

    Also, according to the latest data, there is a whole list of camera modules with which the manufacturer completes this smartphone:
    • The main module - S5K3P3 F16S01C
    • Front module - S5K5E8 Z5E8YAB

    • The main module - S5K3P3 OMIDA01
    • Front module - OV5670 OMI5F06

    • OV16880 F16V01A
    • OV16880 OMIDA05
    • S5K5E8 Z5E8YAB
    • S5K5E8 YX13
    • OV5670 OMI5F06
    • OV5670 D5V01G
    • S5K3P3 F3P3MAN


Photos from our users
Applications
Useful




Attention! If you want to share your examples of photos, please do it throughGoogle driveorYandex.Disk.
There the photos are not compressed, they load faster and they are much more convenient to watch, Thank you!


Post has been editedDjeclol - 04.10.20, 13:04
Reason for editing: Corrected patch drawdown FPS for Android 10 (with shimmer retracted camera)



Rep: (0)
I post more pictures.
On the screen, everything looks pretty good. Moreover, if you apply filters and lay out in instagrams, then everything is fine.
In general, you can use. I think I'll finish the firmware. In daylight, everything is very decent, at night, to be honest, is also not quite terrible.
The main problem is artificial lighting, the camera makes everything gray and not beautiful.
Attached Image

Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedDarGreeny - 18.02.16, 10:07



Rep: (357)
Examples of photos from the global stabilizer 7.1.7.0. Settings: high quality, widescreen. Photo sheet and office with the setting of sharpness "high". Night photo with NNT mode
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image



Rep: (23)
Here are some examples of comparisons with the Meizu MX4. I note that MX4 Pro shot much better than MX4, but I had to part with it. On the photo you can see something about what I wrote. In low light behaves worse, noise reduction is cruel, you can see on the skin on the cup. Especially bother with the photo did not, did not bother to shoot. In favor of Note 3 Pro, I will say that it gives a much better macro with flash.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedclassifiedman - 26.03.16, 00:06



Rep: (424)
demonВ® @ 03/26/2016, 00:35*
macro photo

Attached Image



Rep: (13)
Regarding the camera for myself, I concluded that with normal lighting, the photos are quite good, at least for me this is absolutely acceptable quality, especially with HDR. But when the light is not enough, I decided to use Snap Camera HDR, which in such conditions makes the photo clearer, unlike the native camera, which lubricates all the details.
Today I took my photo with my camera in the afternoon (the first shot with HDR, the second without), as for me, everything is fine with the camera. Although if a little more correct software for the camera will be glad. But that's my personal opinion.
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedjenibek - 06.06.16, 22:22
Reason for editing: spoiler



Rep: (189)
Pofotkal today on the phone walk in the city. On a sunny day, the quality of photos is more than excellent, at least for me.
Fotochki
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image




Rep: (30)
I keep trying to shoot in different modes and different cameras and compare. Now night shot
Stock camera on the car, the result is not:
Attached Image

Stock camera night mode, quite good
Attached Image

A cyanogen camera, rather abruptly, a very large amount of photos, but there is a lack of a bit of noise
Attached Image

Well, this is also a cyanogen camera but with a reduced exposure is quite good.
Attached Image

camera potential is good



Rep: (8)
* DreamOn1983 ,

In my opinion, great shots :)



Rep: (2)
tested a little camera.
examples of photos at:https://yadi.sk/d/OI0IWHZGr2XAP
cyan = cyanogen camera
open = open camera
xiaomi = built-in camera
xiaomi_HDR = in-camera HDR enabled
htc_one_m7 = sample photo from my previous HTC One M7 phone from the built-in HTC camera for comparison

P.S. photos were made from the hand (without fixing), the focus is always the same (on the grandfather or on the poster with the heroes of the office)
P.P.S. if anyone is worried about the firmware version, then xiaomi.eu 7.2.2 stable

my impressions
1) From this choice, I like the most and equally among themselves like Open Camera and Xiaomi HDR.
the only choice is that you love everything to beexpensively richbright (then HDR) or pale (then Open Camera).
If you are puzzled “which of the pictures is closer in color to the perception by the eyes” - then this is HDR or M7.
2) taking into account the fact that in M7 the camera is 4 (!) Ultra-pixel of 2013, and the picture is the same, I have to admit the “average” of the RN3Pro camera, even though I was counting on it (using other people's examples too), it will be noticeable better


Post has been editeddruid911 - 15.04.16, 14:52



Rep: (189)
* druid911,
After iPhone 4 and Lenovo S860 in the XRN3 Pro camera, it immediately struck me that he takes pictures instantly, even in HDR mode, and this is cool. Yes, and pictures in comparison with the voiced above phones are obtained better.



Rep: (2)
* nblx nox
I think RN3Pro in HDR mode thinks for half a second-second (if you do not keep the camera in place for 0.5-1 second, the photo will be blurred), in other modes immediately.
but my 2013 M7 always took off right away, so I didn’t notice the difference.



Rep: (13)
After several experiments, he decided that the module itself in our chamber is quite good and its characteristics are quite decent as for its price category. But here the program implementation of the work of this module itself, of course, wishes to be the best. Here, for example, I took off two almost identical photos with the help of native software and using Snap Camera. The conditions were a little complicated by the light of the sun through the leaves of the tree. And if you carefully look at these photos, it is immediately clear that the native camera takes pictures worse. Although sometimes there are cases when this difference is not noticed at all. As a rule, it is in ideal conditions for uniform lighting. And when there are shaded places in the frame, then Snap Camera works better.
A photo with the date - made by a native camera, and without - using the Snap Camera. Pay attention to the readability of texts on different signs when approaching. I believe that if it is good to finish the software of our camera, then most people will have much less complaints about the quality of the photo.
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedjenibek - 15.04.16, 18:00
Reason for editing: 3.4 we remove all screenshots under the spoiler



Rep: (21)
https: //fotki.yandex.r...bum/509048/? ncrnd = 3407Happy Easter! Here are some more examples of photos on our phone, the settings were different, the contrast, focus and saturation. Firmware is also different globalki. EXIF data saved.



Rep: (47)
I put on the phone several different cameras from the interest, who can work better with a very decent matrix of our phone. I will do a normal test later, but today, in the field, I’m writing below.

Introductory: Google Camera, Open Camera, Cameringo + is installed (now for stock it sells for 15 rubles)
How the pictures were taken: on one shoulder a heavy bag, in the second hand - a glass of coffee, in the second hand - a phone, i.e. as if just an option when on the go something like it and wanted to capture.

From experiments with programs I can definitely immediately immediately - Panorama The regular camera makes just monstrous and terrible, the chamber from Google in this regard is just a masterpiece. The resolution is high, works quickly, the picture is pleasant. What issues in Panorama mode our full-time camera is sorry, but this is a word that is prohibited. HDR googlocamera works longer, but gives a more familiar to me as a photographer. But because The exposition lasts much longer - then a very big risk of lubrication at the final picture. There is a suspicion that the regular camera simply applies a filter to one shot, and the googlocamera makes several and combines, as well as the technology is intended.

Photos themselves
Full size photos:
Standard camera:
Attached Image

GoogleCamera:
Attached Image

OpenCamera:
Attached Image

Fragments of a photo
Approximately the same area for assessing detail and noise
Standard camera:
Attached Image

GoogleCamera:
Attached Image

OpenCamera:
Attached Image

HDR shots
In OpenCamera did not find how to enable HDR
Standard camera:
Attached Image

GoogleCamera:
Attached Image

Fragments of a photo
Approximately the same area for assessing detail and noise
Standard camera:
Attached Image

GoogleCamera:
Attached Image



Cameringo + set up and then do a comparative review.
From the resulting images in terms of noise pleases GoogleCamera and OpenCamera. In the photo as a whole (selected exposure, colors, etc.) - GoogleCamera.
If you take a picture of HDR - at regular they turn out to be sharper, GoogleCamera takes a final shot for a long time and you need to be still for a decent amount of time.

Thank you, if someone was interested: happy:
At the weekend I can make a normal comparison, if it is interesting.

Alas, I cannot check the color rendition of the display. There is a Datacolor Spayder calibrator, but for the android, the application was for version 4 of the device, and I have 5. Given that the application has been moved to the archive on the manufacturer’s website and is being sold at a discount, the new version most likely should not be expected.



Rep: (8)
Pofotkal today on different cameras. Auto mode.
Camera MX
Attached Image

Cameringo
Attached Image

FV-5
Attached Image

HD CAMERA
Attached Image

Open chamber
Attached Image

Z-camera
Attached Image

Our, dear, standard
Attached Image

I do not know what kind of camera. I installed it for a long time, just "camera" in the navigation.
Attached Image



Rep: (18)
* seregak_borisov
Good post!) And which one do you think is better?) I’m just from the tablet, maybe the picture is distorted) and I’m looking to me all the same photos except stock, it seems better: rofl:



Rep: (30)
I think for everyday the standard thing is that for panoramas google camera



Rep: (8)
* LuckyKzn honestly I do not know. Each has its own advantages. All photos focused on MAZs, but on some bushes porridge in general, and on others leaves are less visible, on one minivan it looks good, and on others it is horrible, but on the contrary lake



Rep: (18)
* seregak_borisov
It is clear) I am certainly a supporter of the stock camera) I hope with time, siaomi will hire or lure a good little man who will bring this camera to mind programmatically)))))



Rep: (3510)
* seregak_borisov
Pofotkal today on different cameras. Auto mode.

Yes, it’s not a car, it’s worth it in our HDR, because the weight is visible. But for me, the best shot is in Cameringo.


Full version    

Help     rules

Now: 14.01.21, 08:39