I understand that for me there are 2 main characteristics: the minimum focal length and the maximum size of the matrix, right?
Almost correctly - there is still a lens aperture (the smaller the number - the better), and Samsung, with its 1.4, has few competitors in this sense. For indoor shooting, this is sometimes significant when the built-in flash does not help. And then, why do you need a purely working apparatus. Do you really shoot for yourself? It seems to me that it is better to spend once on high-quality equipment, which will be quite versatile.
If the only task for you is to fit everything into a frame, then yes, the main parameter for you is the minimum focal length, even the matrix is ​​not so important. But note that on many devices they write FR for a specific lens, and not reduced to full frame (EGF). Then, of course, the viewing angle also depends on the size of the matrix. Look for the exact distance (EGF) in the characteristics. It is preferably not more than 24.
Posted on 09/16/2013, 12:52: I found another great option, but it is also not the cheapest - a mirrorless Pentax Q camera (from 11 with a standard lens)
http://market.yandex.ru/offers.xml?modelid...&grhow=shopand to her interchangeable lens PENTAX-03 FISH EYE (similar to 17 EGF, price from 5 ty). Everything will fit exactly into such a lens, and the camera itself will fit in your pocket :) or you can even take it with the standard zoom, though it’s not so wide at the short end - analog 28 EGF. So, if it is significantly higher than 10 sput not to rise, then the variant with Pentax Q kit for 11 sput is probably the most acceptable. Although the fish to him, I would still have bought more :)
Post has been editedManichaean - 16.09.13, 13:01