Photos taken by yourself and hands.
Example. God knows that, but how long the manual lens of the 70s was enough.


Yesterday at about 2 am Tested Tamron 80-250 with a tripod.

Accepted someone else's photo with copyright or links to them.

About Mars. There is an opinion that NASA provides us with a photo after processing, and Mars actually does not look like on these photos. No, the landscape is like that, but there are greens there. Quite possible. A country forcibly spreading democracy may conceal or distort reality for its own benefit.

I am not a photographer and I don’t want them to be just nice pictures and here are a couple of shots that I took under my nose the usual Kodak c360 soap box


at the weekend I will go to Max2007 bring a photo report!

300 mm, with hands>_<a lot of noise ...

EGF?

>300 mm, with hands
And what is the endurance?

Miocker , uh ... what?

miggrr , 1/20 with more, not only the trembling in the hands is noticeable, but also the movement of the moon :)

Recluse Well 300 on the lens or taking into account the crop of the camera?

Miocker without crop :) i.e. 300 * 1.6

Festive Kaleidoscope:












to be continued ...

Continued :)











to be continued ...

Ending:












to be continued ...: D

I read somewhere that no one really knows what the color of the atmosphere and the surface of Mars really is. People have a prejudice that Mars is "red", here is NASA and paints photos in a reddish color

Weekends have passed and not alone, but there is still no report! eight)

Then here is my, City Day, 2nd day:

M51 through 8-inch reflector from Celestron

Another moon.

Celestron Sh-K 235mm + Canon 350D



Post has been editedmaxerror_g - 13.09.07, 23:00

Hello!






Best regards - BB

Wow! And it is possible on the soap box, such as Cacio Exlim to shoot similar. I was in Finland in a field, far from the city, so there are such stars, you will begin to rock!

Big Dipper. :)

Olympus C760, 15 sec shutter speed, digital noise was removed separately.