Landscape | We look at nature
Landscape
Landscape - The genre of fine art, in which the main subject of the image is primeval, or in one degree or another transformed by man nature. Modern ideas about the landscape were formed over the centuries with the development of artistic techniques for his image.
The nature surrounding the person long since agitated him, admired with its beauty and greatness. The genre of fine art, reproducing natural or human-modified nature, is called a landscape. Landscape is also called the work of this genre.
Depending on the nature, landscape motive, you can distinguish rural, urban (including urban architectural - veduta), industrial landscape, marina (from Italian. Tappa - sea). The landscape can be historical, heroic, fantastic, lyrical, epic.
The landscape includes some basic elements:
- Ground surface
- Vegetation
- Human buildings
- Perspective view
The picture may also include:
- Reservoirs (lakes, seas, rivers)
- Fauna
- People
- Shine
- Meteorological formations (clouds, rain).
Links to landscape collections:
Landscape (fr. Paysage, from pays - country, terrain), in painting - the type of painting depicting nature or any area (forest, field, mountain, grove, city, etc.).
The nature surrounding the person long since agitated him, admired with its beauty and greatness. The genre of fine art, reproducing natural or human-modified nature, is called a landscape. Landscape is also called the work of this genre.
Depending on the nature, landscape motive, you can distinguish rural, urban (including urban architectural - veduta), industrial landscape, marina (from Italian. Tappa - sea). The landscape can be historical, heroic, fantastic, lyrical, epic.
The landscape includes some basic elements:
reservoirs (lakes, seas, rivers)
fauna
people
shine
meteorological formations (clouds, rain).
[a source:http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Landscape]
Wonderful theme description from Bombil Calabasov
The nature surrounding the person long since agitated him, admired with its beauty and greatness. The genre of fine art, reproducing natural or human-modified nature, is called a landscape. Landscape is also called the work of this genre.
Depending on the nature, landscape motive, you can distinguish rural, urban (including urban architectural - veduta), industrial landscape, marina (from Italian. Tappa - sea). The landscape can be historical, heroic, fantastic, lyrical, epic.
The landscape includes some basic elements:
- Ground surface
- Vegetation
- Human buildings
- Perspective view
reservoirs (lakes, seas, rivers)
fauna
people
shine
meteorological formations (clouds, rain).
[a source:http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Landscape]
Wonderful theme description from Bombil Calabasov
BombilCalabasov @ 07/11/07 08:34:55
I think everyone will be very interested to see a selection of landscapes of Kamchatka, which today laid out on Chips
http://www.fishki.net/comment.php?id=23245
Looked with great pleasure! And I advise you.
http://www.fishki.net/comment.php?id=23245
Looked with great pleasure! And I advise you.
BombilCalabasov @ 07.20.07 17:36:56
More to our discussion:http://nikolkaya.livejournal.com/166821.html
I'm not quite sure that this is a landscape, but it seems like there is a “direction”, so to speak, a “urban landscape”. In general, I hope for a moderator who, in case of my mistake, will erase everything =)
 |
Evening.
:
Clouds
:
Wave.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:46
:  |
[email protected] 9:10:40
QUOTE ([email protected] 16:36:41)
Evening.
Shooting the movement of water is a difficult task that requires experience from a photographer (and what does not require experience?). A short shutter speed in this image froze the waves. If my memory serves me, the combination of shutter speeds of 1/10 second and f / 8-11 aperture is considered optimal. That, in other matters, should not be a dogma. In such situations, it is interesting to experiment, and then choose the best. On the skewed horizon - it was said repeatedly. If this is not an artistic intent, it is considered a novice’s mistake.
Evening.
Shooting the movement of water is a difficult task that requires experience from a photographer (and what does not require experience?). A short shutter speed in this image froze the waves. If my memory serves me, the combination of shutter speeds of 1/10 second and f / 8-11 aperture is considered optimal. That, in other matters, should not be a dogma. In such situations, it is interesting to experiment, and then choose the best. On the skewed horizon - it was said repeatedly. If this is not an artistic intent, it is considered a novice’s mistake.
Clouds
:  |
[email protected] 9:10:40
QUOTE ([email protected] 16:36:41)
Clouds
... I also repeatedly mentioned the inadmissibility of simply placing the horizon line in the middle of the frame, thereby killing the perspective and perception of both the upper part and the lower part of the picture, which is divided, as it were, into two different halves. I want to show the sky - lower the horizon, I want to emphasize the endlessness - lift it up.
Flesh [zlo],
Clouds
... I also repeatedly mentioned the inadmissibility of simply placing the horizon line in the middle of the frame, thereby killing the perspective and perception of both the upper part and the lower part of the picture, which is divided, as it were, into two different halves. I want to show the sky - lower the horizon, I want to emphasize the endlessness - lift it up.
Flesh [zlo],
Wave.
 |
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:46
kochrob ,
Thank you very much for the feedback and criticism. I use the camera for a couple of months. I study, I try to master and experiment, I really like it.
Time, just as usual, is not enough, unfortunately.
Here are some corrected:
I wanted to remove the "track", so these are the focus and the rest. Zadran the horizon, of course not noticed.
:
Of course, I heard about the "golden section", but at the moment of the frame I was not sure that the wave or the clouds was more important.
:
Now 2 options, and both seem to be good.
Thanks again for the advice and comments, I take them with great pleasure 8)
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:52
Thank you very much for the feedback and criticism. I use the camera for a couple of months. I study, I try to master and experiment, I really like it.
Time, just as usual, is not enough, unfortunately.
Here are some corrected:
I wanted to remove the "track", so these are the focus and the rest. Zadran the horizon, of course not noticed.
:  |
Of course, I heard about the "golden section", but at the moment of the frame I was not sure that the wave or the clouds was more important.
:  |
 |
Now 2 options, and both seem to be good.
Thanks again for the advice and comments, I take them with great pleasure 8)
Flesh [ZLO] 06/26/07 5:31:37 PM
In my opinion, the second option is better ... =)
Kochrob @ 06.26.07 17:31:37
On mine too. in the first version, it was necessary to raise the horizon line.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:52
The clouds on Saturday were very beautiful ... but somehow, in my opinion, after reducing the size, everything became more boring ... I didn’t cut off anything ...
Original. More accurate, weight ~ 2mb:
I understand that the picture is more perceived by you in that contest, in which you saw this landscape live. But the snapshot lives in its laws. Almost 20% of the snapshot from below is a completely unreadable blotted color. What is it in the picture? The right corner is completely empty from above. The whole point and plot snapshot is built on a series of bright clouds, which are diagonally. It is they who set a snapshot of the rhythm and give the dynamics. Therefore, it is still worth removing unnecessary from the snapshot and concentrate the attention of the viewer precisely on these clouds.
I have a very similar frame on this subject. Unfortunately, this is not a very good scan from the film (I still can’t get to the normal laboratory to make a normal version). With this picture I tried to convey the volume and scope. It seems to have happened, it seems to me. Specially caught in the frame small uncle, to better convey the space of the image and the scale of what is happening in the sky.
The picture was taken on the OLYMUS iS-3000 with a wide-angle nozzle up to 28mm.
Post has been editedkochrob - 30.09.07, 01:53
 |
Original. More accurate, weight ~ 2mb:
 |
[email protected] 23:05:25
and I would put this picture somehow like this ...
From the bottom all the same nonsense is not readable, so I want to focus more on the clouds themselves ...
From the bottom all the same nonsense is not readable, so I want to focus more on the clouds themselves ...
 |
Flesh [ZLO] 07/05/07 1:40:00
not worse, but in my opinion, not better ...
Flesh [ZLO] 07/05/07 11:31:58
Regarding my "Niza" well, I certainly fully understand you, yes, not the most pleasant color, empty, but I don't like the naked sky, there must be an earth =) Perhaps the truth went over a bit, right here you can wash it only cut, because the angle to change so that less than the earth was, not exactly in my opinion correctly, if only because there will be a lot of excess sky ... But the clouds on that day were just irresistible, sorry I could not completely pass my feelings in the photo =) Thank you I look forward to comments and answers, as well as your photos.
[email protected] 11:37:44
I agree. I think BombilCalabasov, overdoing with cutting off the bottom. Somewhere in the middle could be done. And it is not a fact that it would be better.
[email protected] 12:31:42
I also think that the truth is in the middle. If the bottom would be brighter, more chtoli, then it would be possible not to cut it.
I understand that the picture is more perceived by you in that contest, in which you saw this landscape live. But the snapshot lives in its laws. Almost 20% of the snapshot from below is a completely unreadable blotted color. What is it in the picture? The right corner is completely empty from above. The whole point and plot snapshot is built on a series of bright clouds, which are diagonally. It is they who set a snapshot of the rhythm and give the dynamics. Therefore, it is still worth removing unnecessary from the snapshot and concentrate the attention of the viewer precisely on these clouds.
I have a very similar frame on this subject. Unfortunately, this is not a very good scan from the film (I still can’t get to the normal laboratory to make a normal version). With this picture I tried to convey the volume and scope. It seems to have happened, it seems to me. Specially caught in the frame small uncle, to better convey the space of the image and the scale of what is happening in the sky.
The picture was taken on the OLYMUS iS-3000 with a wide-angle nozzle up to 28mm.
 |
Post has been editedkochrob - 30.09.07, 01:53
I started to get involved in photography about a month ago. Here are a couple of landscape shots. I would be happy for criticism.
in the park
:
pond
bench
:
painter
:
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:58
in the park
:  |
pond
 |
bench
:  |
painter
:  |
Flesh [ZLO] 07/07/07 08:51:52
MR_NUKE, on the first horizon peashed in the eyes very rushes ... "The artist" I really like ... In my opinion, a delightful photo ... In the photo "Pond" something is wrong ... =) And what I can not say, I do not know ... =) But something definitely not that ... and the photo would be much nicer, if the water was without vegetation ... and the black spot is somehow in the middle of the frame, the plant is still Something clearly does not paint a photo, but it is no longer your wine ... And I will not comment on the shop, I do not like the shops =) But the sparrows on the urn is pleasant =)
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 23:58
The mountains.
Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi.
:
:
:
Post has been editedkochrob - 22.07.07, 00:02
Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi.
 |
:  |
:  |
:  |
SD Alone @ 07/07/07 10:12:12
The sky is beautiful, but everything else is somehow dark.
Flesh [ZLO] 07.07.07 11:16:24
SD Alone, so the metering in the sky went, so everything is dark, if the metering is done on the landscape, the sky will be overexposed, and the sky will not remain beautiful ...
[email protected] 17:00:45
He just everything is evenly lit. Therefore, the work ugly. No light-shadow pattern.
Post has been editedkochrob - 22.07.07, 00:02
By the way. Loved it. Do tyts here.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:47
[email protected] 10:12:22
Beautiful thing. Only visible is the processing in Photoshop (unnatural, in general). Yes, and shoots this scene he has drafted his entire adult life.
He studied it all up and down. And that, without processing does not do
This landscape was filmed by me, for all my life, starting from 7 years, with six cameras. Glad to have the opportunity to try again.
He studied it all up and down. And that, without processing does not do
SD Alone @ 07.07.07 22:48:17
However, it turned out exactly
DVAD @ 07/09/07 11:05:03
the person correctly picked up the angle and time of shooting. in a few years you can learn. but beautiful, albeit processed in Photoshop. I then laid out the raw photos - I do not know how to handle and even from the cable car is difficult to choose the angle of shooting. how not to fall down
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:47
Several landscapes shot by KonicaMinolta Z3
Post has been editedkochrob - 09.07.07, 09:55
 |
M
And I more like the third.
Post has been editedkochrob - 09.07.07, 09:55
Kuskovo
Weak on the execution of the photo. Horizon zakoshen. "Empty" nondescript sky. The lack of a light-shadow pattern made the image flat. If it was not possible to choose another shooting time, one could frame the frame differently: change the horizon line, use nozzles or fish-eye filters, gradient filters, just crop, finally.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:48
 |
!
Stuck remind about the size of photos !!!
M
I've already fixed everything
-CkaM- @ 07/08/07 7:07:00 PM
Kuskovo
Weak on the execution of the photo. Horizon zakoshen. "Empty" nondescript sky. The lack of a light-shadow pattern made the image flat. If it was not possible to choose another shooting time, one could frame the frame differently: change the horizon line, use nozzles or fish-eye filters, gradient filters, just crop, finally.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:48
Demonstration of a 12-fold zoom in Minolta
We look at the sheep.
And now we look at what real distance they were:
:
Post has been editedkochrob - 30.09.07, 02:01
We look at the sheep.
 |
And now we look at what real distance they were:
:  |
Post has been editedkochrob - 30.09.07, 02:01
And from me the sunk :) Also Minolta.
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:53
 |
SD Alone @ 07/09/07 4:52:04 PM
catch myoriginal:
 |
Post has been editedkochrob - 21.07.07, 22:53
Village Selishchi, Tver region, Volnushka river =)
Canon PowerShot S3, without processing
I give links, so as not to stretch the page =)
Post has been editeddidex - 07.04.09, 20:05
Canon PowerShot S3, without processing
I give links, so as not to stretch the page =)
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Seklth @ 07/09/07 5:45:43 PM
everything is here =) 34 meters
_ftp://80.92.105.79/pub/seklth/Foto/
_ftp://80.92.105.79/pub/seklth/Foto/
Attached images
Post has been editeddidex - 07.04.09, 20:05
Reason for editing: Placed pictures
NikDV , SD Alone , Seclth , Beauty is terrible! guys, super, I love it! Can I ask the originals to hang on the wall?
Added @ 09.07.2007, 15:42
Since I’m talking about sunsets ... two years ago, I took a picture of the minolta ... of course with yours no comparison, but nevertheless let it be ... Please do not criticize, I see all the mistakes, there are only mistakes, but the color is beautiful = )
Added @ 09.07.2007, 15:42
Since I’m talking about sunsets ... two years ago, I took a picture of the minolta ... of course with yours no comparison, but nevertheless let it be ... Please do not criticize, I see all the mistakes, there are only mistakes, but the color is beautiful = )
 |
©savagemessiahzine.com2005-2021 All rights reserved.
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement