I can finally lay not idle talk, and additional tests AMOLED
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Review-Samsun...ID.68814.0.htmlLook. Contrast is really very high, because Black 0.01 cd / mВі. As a result, 32,800: 1 - very good. Brightness on the average of 344.3 cd / m - less than good IPS, but also good. Note In all better than the vaunted SGS2 with Super AMOLED +. In SGS2 pixel density of 217, and in Note 285 pixels per inch. Good display. But the brightness does not reach the IPS. Not bad, not much inferior IPS, and transmits color.
Part colors. Well do not want to believe the tests for 2 p., Where clearly visible in the pictures color distortion that any software or settings are not correct. Take SGS2, as already advised in the store, and take a picture of an object near the bright blue, green or red. Bring to SGS2 subject to the photo on the screen. Color is so obviously at odds with the original, you have to be color-blind to not notice. In the Note, by the way, a little bit better with flowers than SGS2. Samsung can realize the mistake and did not "lift up" on it so the colors?
NIF-NIF, your knowledge of technology wants to be better ... Scan is on all LCD. On my home 3D LED TV - 200Hz. A Note on she 58Hz. Even a little lower than in the conventional IPS.
Sumashedshii, You are confusing dynamic contrast with the usual. Dynamic, as already stated above, is easily measured by the millions. For example, my LCD TV produces 8 million: 1. And it's not much. When I am buying, compared with models with 10,000,000: 1. This gives now the LCD TV without any organic crystals. But these millions - dynamic contrast.
Post has been editedVitFom - 22.01.12, 20:20