D4nte @ 12/04/2011, 10:16
And why do you need a readable number of the person who cut?
If you were cut, and you flew to the bus stop with people .... with fatal outcomes, and at the same time the number of the perpetrator (who cut it) is on BP, then your fault in the court will be (maybe) partial and then only according to item 10.1 Traffic regulations
(If there is a danger to the traffic that the driver is able to detect, he must take possible measures to reduce speed, even to stop the vehicle.)i.e. fine. Here everyone is guided by the fact that in paragraph 10.1 of the traffic rules it is not written that you can or should maneuver ...
In such situations, when it is not possible to identify the person who provoked the accident, all the blame will fall on you ...
Drivers, in such cases they say, for example, "I was cut by a black BMW and left ... or dark blue, or maybe dark green ... it was dusty, I couldn’t see exactly" (look for dark BMW) ...
The same situation with the post, if you are still alive ... You will have to pay for a broken pole, your treatment and restoration of a car, if the “gavnyuk” is not found ...
D4nte @ 12/04/2011, 10:45
In bad conditions (dark, blur due to high speed or shaking), the number will be blurred regardless of resolution. What difference does a blurred number have letters with a height of 20 pixels or 30? Yes, no! Taking into account the fact that the whole matrix is ​​used for recording in 720p, and in 1080 only half is used, respectively, that for 720 there are still not bad conditions, for 1080 it is already bad ..
Here I agree, therefore, I constantly focus the author’s attention on the forum on focusing, although I think it’s still better for examination to be 1080p ... It’s in android, you can disassemble the video stream, only by key frames (I-frame), and experts laid out on the GOP over all (I-frame, P-frame, B-frame), where a large role, of course, is played by the number of frames per second, of which there may be more with 720p and a good bitrate ...
But, all the same, I think many will agree with me that the greater the video resolution (with the same codec and the number of frames per second), the easier it will be for experts to recognize the number ...
D4nte @ 12/04/2011, 10:45
I didn’t understand about the pedestrian: do you think that a record in which you can’t see how the pedestrian was moving proves something? It will not prove anything, but it will be just useless, consider that you shot a raven in the sky. With the same success, you can simply not show the recording from a wide angle if you think that it is disadvantageous to you.
It’s better not to talk about pedestrians, this is my point of view and therefore I wrote,
for thought... There are many all but ... (the specific situation, witnesses, sober / drunk pedestrian, running / not running, what his vision, transition / non-transition, whether the zebra, the location of the investigator is visible, judges, experts and professional lawyer. ..) paint with paper rolling and pedestrian approaching cars with small and large viewing angle ... with a good lawyer, you can retrain hit a pedestrian, the pedestrian the bases in order to get money from you or agoltelogo pedestrian who ran across the road in the wrong place and you noticed it too late ... What, just to confirm the video with a small ugolm review.
Just still believe that the smaller the length of the roll, the better for us (drivers). Time video traffic accident should be to fix, as a rule, no more than 20 seconds, everything else that will be written to an accident, can play against you, and the longer the clip, the worse, because before the accident, you might grossly violate traffic rules repeatedly ... you want it? I do not, therefore, put a minimal video 30 seconds long. In an extreme case, select the 2 clips, moving into an important and Convert, and have a long clip to cut, to hide from the investigation and trial, indecent or erroneous behavior on the road ...
Heremore thoughts ...
Besides, I was also disappointed by the small viewing angle in 1080p and I just began to look for an excuse for this ... But this is not a reason to refuse Full HD, since there is an extensible lens that will make the viewing angle in 1080p the same as in 720p . If anyone needs ...
Post has been editedGrand1 - 29.12.11, 11:59