igwill I compare with KiPass only because that is at the moment imho there is nothing more convenient to use on a device (the same two icons in the taskbar which hang login and password of the currently open cards in kipass + organization with dropboksom and the ability to store the key separately, remembering ways to base and key), despite the fact that no additional. fields and the card appears a lot of auxiliary of information, I do not consider the creation of cards on a device, namely, the use of already naked choked on BB information.
You're right about the fact that Kipass more focused on a bunch of username / password (websites, etc.), it is the lack of it.
Well HendiSeyf concerns, then a desktop and android part of her very simple, and loses in terms of settings and in terms of ease of use and in terms of UI design, again this is my IMHO. Under usability, I'm going to all sorts of stuff and options enhance usability.
Pros and cons of HandySafe (hereinafter HS) compared to SafeWallet (hereinafter SW):
-one. in HS, in principle, there is no synchronization over the air with no dropboksom no network, only a phone connection to the flash mode to a computer, can not even be in use through kipass Androidovsky Dropboksa client, because you can not on a device to specify the path to the database.
-2. In the early versions were precedent to bypass the protection on a device.
-3. Not so easy to copy to the clipboard as in SW (to copy data in the field SafeWal just need to tap on the desired field in HandySafe to do long tap and then select the desired item)
-four. in HS only basic field types (text, date, password, phone number) in the SW field is much more and work with them to implement a convenient (those icons at the edge)
-5. in the HS can not maintain multiple databases (though it is quite insignificant flaw)
-6. in HS when entering a password needs to be done to confirm input SW with the right set of password software automatically logs
7. HS in a folder with a basket that is sometimes convenient to SW it is not.
8. the size of the paid version of the HS for android weighs 3.3 MB and client for BB over 8MB have SafeWal 5.6mb and 3.5Mb, while the icons at the base SafeWal order of magnitude greater.
-9. cost HS android / desktop - $ 10 / $ 25 against SW android / desktop - 4 $ / 15 $
10. at HS has a Russian language in SW no, but soon will be.
-eleven. from SW has the ability to import databases HS (HS base SW does not support), and a whole list of more + have the opportunity to download a CSV which can be formed from almost any program.
-12. in the HS do not know why add graphics card, it is not beautiful and uncomfortable, because intermeddle with the minimum of information, the optimal customizable cards were at the time only in the SPB Wallet
That's what I noticed at first view, neither the one nor the other program I have used on a regular basis, just created a couple of cards on the BB zasinhril them on the device and tried to work with them, posozdaval your templates, going configured. While the main program I stands still KeePass but will give up my time to SafeWallet, I am now correspondence with the authors on the subject of aid in the Russification of both versions for Android and BB.
Post has been editedEgOrrr - 28.12.10, 00:45