Vorken @ 08/29/06 00:52:19
But in general I read an interesting article on the topic that it is better to use unknown or little-known antivirus. Type on the well-known viri are tested. Statistics was from Eset.
There are a lot of tests. According to one of them, just to heuristics (the bases are old, viruses are set on new ones, and still Trojans and many other things), in the first places there are symanteks and bitdefender. Found the same (about 90%), but the bit cured (without having bases!) Half, and symantec only a third. In third place is macuffy. The rest is far away.