Goplex @ 20.07.17, 15:47
XP enough 256 MB RAM, 1 GB and older
For Windows XP, 256MB is enough RAM ?!
I agree! But only for Windows XP
SP2 and no one upgrade more.
Win XP SP3 + all other updates, which is not really one SP accumulated until 2013, already more monstrous than the Win 7.
She needs to 1024MB of memory, so she just breathed on its own, without attachments.
Goplex @ 20.07.17, 15:47
the only thing necessary is its absence.
You learn in the Theater School. BV Shchukin?
Class EV Petrosyan? Excellence in training, probably!
Only under vynyu I saw completely zavirusovannye PC completely deleted information!
more than 1 million. Virus was written under it glyukalovo! No other operating system can boast such "achievement"!
Well, what is now the MS-glyukodrom became less infected - the merit of routers, switches, ONTov on Linux.
For now, there is virtually no PC to Win, with a solid IP-Aders and walking directly to the Internet.
Take out all PC cowardly squatting on a non-routed the IP-Aders behind the Linux-routers.
Goplex @ 20.07.17, 15:47
it has passed since the release of service pack 3 on XP
This applies only conditionally Win 7. And now its speed can not be compared with thereof, for example, in 2009.
But the vaunted Win Prof 10 on my laptop, after 2 years of upgrades, not already loaded so quickly, as in the beginning of the epic called "Win 10 and 1 billion. PC under its control."
MS will soon release a new update and Win 10 will again become as heavy as the weight, all MS OS.
I think that this will happen more and deliberately, with malice - WIntel clan decided to throw the old PC to the new build of Win 10 to force users to upgrade the iron! Exactly processors from Intel for $ 2000 / piece ripe! It's time to get users to upgrade Your ... kick in the butt!
Post has been editedmkudritsky - 21.07.17, 03:11