really nobody uses camera raw?


Post has been editedMiocker - 28.04.10, 14:37

Please help me understand, here we have a snapshot in raw. I don’t like the exposure, noises, red eyes, etc. There is a photoshop and a raw converter. ? Already in the converter itself, and then in the FS with dzhipegom work? Or Photoshop raw process, and then convert?

so more correct

The RAW format contains much more color information than jpeg, so all color manipulations, exposure should be carried out only in RAW (if available). I can advise Adobe Lightroom - it is much more convenient for Photoshop to handle a large amount of photos. There it’s somewhat difficult for a beginner to figure it out, but if you really understand it, then for most of the tasks it is more than enough.

I usually process raw, then save to tiff

Yodo,
There is always a chance that the native RAW converter understands more information from a RAW file than Photoshop. For example, in Nikon there is such a feature as D-Lighting, and I have not seen something not one program, except for my own Nikon, which would be able to use the data of D-Lighting.
Another thing is that for processing most of the photos, a direct opening of the RAW-file in the FSH or Lightroom is enough.

Except for such rare cases (when you need to pull out parts from the shadow or use other specific features), it does not matter which software to use. Photoshop in the same way allows you first, using a variety of parameters, to convert the photo into RGB space, and then edit it with standard tools. What, in fact, does not differ from the chain of RAW ->converter ->jpeg ->Photoshop.

So use what is more convenient for you to use, and start experimenting with different combinations of software in the event of non-standard situations.

Post has been editedShedal - 08.02.11, 12:18

and no one will tell a quick way to edit the exposure? But then something I have, for example, in one photo, when I try, the background is normal, and the window is overexposed and vice versa. how to get rid of it? And another question about actions, is it possible to record an action for editing the exposure? how then will the computer determine how and where to rule?

and another question, for some reason, when I use pipettes in my curves, dots do not appear on the curve, but some three colored lines appear (like red, blue and green). I thought to edit the exposure by pressing the pipettes on the darkest and lightest areas, then look where the point appeared and pull it.

Yodo from what literature is such knowledge about working with curves? : happy:

and what is wrong? Why do not dots appear?

Well, for example an articlehttp://www.compartstudio.com/school/book/3-01/3-01.htm

Is there a converter for android?

Snapseed, Lightroom, Photo mate, Photoshop.


In the process of discussing the processing of RAW c Lenovo P2 made some explanatory vidyushki for dummies, I think will fit for this topic.

1. RAW processing in ACDSee
2. Addition to 1 video, batch processing and BB questions.
3. RAW processing in RawTherapee
4. Multi-frame noise reduction and superresolution.
5. Creating panoramic images of high resolution.
6. Portrait.
7. A short look at Spapseed for the very beginners.

https: //www.youtube.co...--BFlpUJXDhUDWWeMsP7PT

Generally speaking, Active D-Lighting does not just put labels in NEF files, it affects the data itself. So they see, and show as a result, these are all programs, but only Nikon programs can make changes to their algorithms to exactly match Nikon's ideas. A couple of years ago I switched to DXO Optics Pro, which is now called DXO PhotoLab. It is most correct, from third-party programs, NEF understands. By the way, there are now some chips from the programs from Nikon appeared (U-point).



More precisely, there are more digits per color saved than jpeg. All the same information directly from the matrix in fact. For example, in Nikon (D7000, for example), you can choose a bit width of 12 or 14, which is much more than 8 bits in jpeg.



If it's in jpeg, then it's not always possible to fix it. Just the information in the highlights and shadows may already be lost. If raw, then twist the curves. But even here the result is not always guaranteed.

ektsysto
Wow, what an ancient topic has risen :)) my comment was 7 years ago ...

Thank you for the detailed instructions now I will try to take pictures of Babe mode

How to align the building? In the wide-angle building inundated frame at the edges.