Discussion camera Samsung Galaxy S10e, S10, S10 + (Exynos)



Rep: (2347)
Camera talkSamsung Galaxy S10e / S10 / S10 + (Exynos)
SM-G970F / SM-G973F / SM-G975F
Discussion camera Samsung Galaxy S10e / S10 / S10 + (Snapdragon) | Discussion пїЅ | Purchase пїЅ | Accessories пїЅ | Marriage пїЅ | Owners Club


Photo examples
useful links

Attention! If you want to share your examples of photos, please do it throughGoogle driveorYandex.Disk.
There the photos are not compressed, they load faster and they are much more convenient to watch, Thank you!


Post has been editedPartizan 777 - 07.07.19, 15:03



Rep: (343)
Lexx. @ 03/06/19, 11:03*
In my opinion, the difference is almost imperceptible, which cannot be conveyed as distressing.

It seems to me or does s7 have better granularity? With noise, Samsung really got it.

Post has been editedhidus - 06.03.19, 11:19



Rep: (59)
LeXX. @ 03/06/19 10:03*
Photo S10 vs old S7

I'm at a loss ......... How so ??????? It’s strange somehow. The last flagship for 1200 cu, and removes at s7 level ............. This can be regarded as "open spit of 2019 in the face of the consumer from Samsung", which buys the phone only from for his fancy camera!



Rep: (12)
Mrrr_Lev @ 03/06/19, 10:08*
On the left is S8, on the right is S10. Machine.

Specifically, in this example, I like S10 more.
Thanks for the pictures!



Rep: (59)
Max-pax @ 03/06/19, 10:13*
Specifically, in this example, I like S10 more.

Similarly! here S10 without crop wins S8 in detail ..... If you sprinkle, the balance of power may change in favor of S8 ......



Rep: (2830)
Lexx. @ 03/06/19, 11:03*
In my opinion, the difference is almost imperceptible, which cannot be conveyed as distressing.

And mine is just awesome!
S7 is noticeably worse. Look at least at the chairs, and at the banner above:
Crops. First s10, second s7
Attached Image

Attached Image

Lowering s10 to s7 is still not worth it. : yes2:

Post has been editedsparta - 06.03.19, 11:18



Rep: (11)
Hidus @ 03/06/19, 11:10*
It seems to me or does s7 have better granularity? With noise, Samsung really got it.

Here I am in shock from the camera! This was the main argument for updating the phone, and here such nonsense. Previously, I always bought smarts half a year after sales, after reading reviews. But then he was seduced by the anniversary version and pre-ordered ...

Sparta @ 03/06/19, 11:16*
Lowering s10 to s7 is still not worth it. : yes2:

Look at raw link here. Maybe also what jambs of the lens you find?

Post has been editedLeXX. - 06.03.19, 11:20
Reason for editing:.



Rep: (15)
* LeXX.,

Opened nearby pictures from the building. If this difference is almost imperceptible, then I do not know. For me, a significant difference in the photo. And granularity at 7 is two levels lower.

Attached images
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedalexb_2000 - 06.03.19, 11:24



Rep: (1140)
I will transfer my post with a comparative photo from the main topic
I compared the cameras s8 and s10, the eight have a little noise, a dozen are watercolor, but a dozen more accurately reproduces color in difficult conditions.
s8
Attached Image

s10
Attached Image

s8
Attached Image

s10
Attached Image


s8
Attached Image

s10
Attached Image




Rep: (4014)
Vintal2002 @ 03/06/19, 14:24*
but a dozen more accurately reproduces color in difficult conditions.

judging by the last photo - I do not see this;)
In general, it was not worth waiting for something new from a 2-3 year old camera, mainly with software alterations. I already said that Samsung has slowed down in the development of the photographic part. If in the video part they are still at the forefront, then in the photo part they have long since lost the status of a photo flag. Fairly all

Post has been editedPako777 - 06.03.19, 11:35



Rep: (343)
Sparta @ 03/06/19, 11:16*
Lowering s10 to s7 is still not worth it.

Same photo. The watercolor on c10 is annoying.
Attached Image

Attached Image



Rep: (2830)
* hidus
Watercolor VS Soap.
The eternal dilemma. : foto:



Rep: (4014)
Hidus @ 03/06/19, 14:38*
The watercolor on c10 is annoying.

it’s a matter for males, the fashion went like that .. on the previous model everyone didn’t get excited about the detail of the picture, but who better to get bokeh: lol: Everything was “excellent” with watercolors on the last device
Sparta @ 03/06/19, 14:41*
Watercolor VS Soap.
The eternal dilemma. : foto:

here rather "watercolor vs detail" battle is appropriate: D

Post has been editedPako777 - 06.03.19, 11:43



Rep: (343)
Sparta @ 03/06/19, 11:41*
Watercolor VS Soap.
Eternal Dilemma

So it is treated easily. The appetites of noise reduction and contour sharpness need to be reduced, there will be more noise but the part will trample up.

Post has been editedhidus - 06.03.19, 11:46



Rep: (4014)
Hidus @ 03/06/19, 14:43*
So it is treated easily. Noise reduction appetites need to be reduced, there will be more noise but the part will trample up.

Well, you can’t make everyone use it .. only the elect, who can be bored too. Yes, and not the fact that the ISP in Rav does not add gag<_<

PS .. I don’t even mention the patches of the stock camera and firewood, this is no longer fashionable

Post has been editedPako777 - 06.03.19, 11:49



Rep: (343)
Pako777 @ 03/06/19, 11:47*
Well, you can’t make everyone use it .. only the elect, who can be bored too. Yes, and not the fact that the ISP did not add a gag to Rav

I'm talking about the work of automation, noise reduction and contour sharpness.
According to the idea, these are software sores, if Samsung wants, it can raise the quality by updating

Post has been editedhidus - 06.03.19, 11:50



Rep: (2830)
* hidus
You can’t get your head in Samsung: he has exclusively “instagram” thinking, which is based on the typical exclamation of a mass of users:
"Look what a sharp photo!".
: D



Rep: (1140)
Pako777 @ 03/06/19, 11:32*
judging by the last photo - I do not see this

But I see that the sunset was exactly the same color as s10 issued, and s8 captured the whole gag.



Rep: (4014)
* hidus
I don’t think males will scratch to such an extent
Sparta @ 03/06/19, 14:48*
You can’t get your head in Samsung: he has exclusively “instagram” thinking, which is based on the typical exclamation of a mass of users:
"Look what a sharp photo!".

and most importantly, the gestures of Huawei, Oppo, etc., in terms of gaining the positions of photographic flags do not disturb them. If "their" iron was combined with the software processing of the Samsung - that would be a bomb. In the meantime, yes .. Tokma for viewing at 6 ", preview icons and in social networks



Rep: (24)
Since such a booze has gone ...
3 pictures S10
all in auto mode with stabilizer
shirik - normal - TV + photo from the old soap dish 2005 (Sony DSC-N1)
Well, a couple of crop s10 vs. Sony
Samsung, how so? : resent:
In terms of color reproduction, I’ll say right away - Sonya is closer
Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image



Rep: (4014)
Vintal2002 @ 03/06/19, 14:56*
But I see that the sunset was exactly the same color as s10 issued, and s8 captured the whole gag.

there is no talk about c8 .. but I judge in the snow and the general blue - failure


Full version    

Help     rules

Now: 08/07/19, 9:58 p.m.