PHPoeniX @ 04/21/2019 08:27
I propose to remove proprietary software from the header, if it has open analogues
Of course, this will not be done.
Just because it is necessary to give users the opportunity and freedom of choice within reason.
What can be useful is detailed comparative reviews of the "correct" and "incorrect" software, which will clearly show the corresponding point of view. Of course, for this it is necessary to make more efforts, unlike deletions: to build - not to break ...
Of course, some believe that they are the smartest and correct, and may try to impose the opinion of others with the help of various techniques, but periodic voting in the topic, and the very development of the topic since its inception, show that the more freedom in the topic the size of the caps and the breadth of the discussions are all the better for everyone, and everyone finds something of their own in it.
Drakonknayt @ 04/21/2019 08:54
Further in the main topic in red to write what not to discuss and the curator will follow this
If we are talking about the fact that there is no mention of this topic and some accompanying nuances in the main topic header, it is simply because I would like to combine this with the next general update of the header.
Inside the main topic, this topic was mentioned when the results of the voting were summarized.
Post has been editedokomand - 27.04.19, 02:35