Antony_droid @ 03/01/19, 21:58
Wedding planners are tricking the technique, do you want to say that?
Swafoto, on
beggarpost-Soviet space, this
only photo genre in which
1. extremely low entry threshold
2. there is the possibility of emotional speculation
3. (Corollary to Clause 2) receive money more often than on the neck
All this leads to the fact that here almost every owner of the camera dreams of driving into weddings. Omit the issue of profitability. But since with training, taste and talents, everything is very bad, they’ll take not a decrease, but a number. That is, 4-6k pictures in less than a day how to do nefig. Just because if you shoot non-stop in series, then even a monkey will get a hundred or two frames, for which it is not very embarrassing.
Now the market is actively blown away, due to the same reasons (it was swollen, by the way, thanks to them), but earlier, when there weren’t so many weddings, even shutters of professional reporting carcasses relatively easily shook off. For example, the D3 has a shutter resource of 300,000 operations. And this is approximately 50-70 weddings performed by local pros. It is clear that the gates often go and more. But the calculated figure from the manufacturer is just that. And those 50-70 weddings, in the days of D3, this is not a very good season. This is today a dozen paid (that is, not DFT and non-dressed models) weddings in a season the limit of dreams for those who have long been cooked in this. 7-10 years ago, even beginners, with inexpensive cameras, received so many orders.
The D90, "inexpensive" (relatively) but the main camera of many wedding planners in those days, had a shutter resource of less than three times. Takes off, respectively, three times faster.
Moreover, the camera is not only a shutter. It is also a bunch of moving parts. Which are also subject to wear. The same buttons, the most commonplace.
Simply put, you are more likely to buy a camera in good condition after a sports photographer than after a post-Soviet wedding photographer.
TheMaXiMkA @ 03/01/19, 10:45 PM
At the expense of the BZK Sony / Panasonic / Olympus, can you give some not bad models for example?
Based on the fact that your Helios "cool" lens is considered - mirrorless. Due to the short working lengths, you can set and more or less successfully use relatively cheap lenses from film systems. The same Helios, yes. Screen magnifier and focus picking (accessories for manual focus) are included.
The cheapest thing is to take a mirrorless camera from Samsung, simply because the production is minimized and the carcasses are thrown off by the owners. The system is dead. But this does not affect the performance of carcasses. But it seems that Samsung has no focus picking in the carcasses.
Sony and Fuji are also a good option.
Olympus and Panasonic are excellent cameras but more for their optics. Which is more expensive (but also more advanced) for lenses 30-50 years ago. The local frame size already greatly affects the base angle of view of the lens (which is designed for a specific frame size, yes) and it becomes too narrow. With the same "Helios" in the apartment is no longer turn around especially. Is that a little cat to shoot.