Gardener @ 09.02.19, 08:44
And maybe then it itself? After all, given the free will, and the end point is only defined?
Who knows. It is not excluded. These are already categories of things that are strongly subjunctive, mostly based on sensory experience or from logical calculations going on (and there and there are whole mountains of errors of various kinds) and the main thing is not to go into metaphysics at all .. God, I'm afraid, with a high probability so only part of the game of our mind. The usefulness or uselessness of such games, and whether itвЂ™s not a mistake to perceive it as a game at all, should be left, for the known root of evil. I do not have a specific opinion on this.
Gardener @ 09.02.19, 08:44
Who is this?
Best seen as a special case of complex self-hypnosis.
However, for the creator, this can cease to exist as a self-suggestion, and fun can happen. Mind games, they are. You can finish the game ..
Conventionally,embodiment of the principle of god
in man. You can give freedom, albeit in a limited way. And drink tea and engage in lewdness,if not created at all then why would
. Although "why" is the question here in principle ... strange.
If we talk about a rational being (even of this kind), and even in the context of discussing the meaning of life, the question вЂњwhyвЂќ automatically implies a specific reason for the existence of a rational being, which in itself puts the rationality of such a thing in question, because without freedom of will, itвЂ™s difficult to become .. Although there is also a moment of essentially limiting the will, but this is already thanks, without me.
Even the hammer has more meanings than the "nailing tool". They can play the cello, although it will require some unique skills: lol: I think the hammer would have been glad if I could.
And returning to the conversation about a person, say that he has a "meaning of life" .. ohhh. Better not worth it.
In general, the deeper into the forest, the better the fly agarics: guess:
Bonus, finally on the topic: in my opinion, the вЂњmeaning of lifeвЂќ, if you like, to call it that, to comprehend (to make a good, comprehensive and useful idea for yourself or not just yourself) at least some part of the world in order, in accordance with their capabilities, to find "their place" in it and to do things that they like, if possible without causing harm to other seekers and the world around them ... because, otherwise, you can get rid of them. After all, they are also reasonable and they also want to comprehend the world and find their place / happiness in it .. Oh, this game theory .. And I will add that reasoning of this kind, like mine, is a priori untenable, since I can only reason from the point view of the cultural heritage about which I have an idea - and I have a rather insignificant amount of knowledge .. and in general, everything is human, too human .. and if even human, but everything is much less - just the fruit of some one, most ordinary life .. :) on the "human" so much to claim there .. no, this is without me.
But I have already written enough, kmk. I like this whole topic because of my uncertainty and the fact that you want to go there and more.
But in fact .. happiness is sometimes already to discuss it, or simply share it.