For 120 no, but for 250 in the pro version, why not
Oh, dreams, dreams ...

$ 250 smart entirely different, entirely different audience.

Let's dream a little about pH 5 in a small package: yes2:

Karramiz
Here's a phone would be ideally-5.7 "and reduce the scope of the top and bottom at least one-third, or even half, and any bangs and drops ... eh

Post has been editedDimarikmavr - 02.02.19, 09:34

Dimarikmavr
Bangs and I do not like, but the drop is nothing so;)

Karramiz I probably zamorochenny perfectionist, but for my taste, when the upper frame is more than 2 times lower than the lower-like something is not right. Here take the example MUSIC 7, if they reduced slightly the chin, or increased by a few millimeters of the top frame would be the same, then we would drop so did not stand out. And the upper frame is 3mm and almost merges with the side and the bottom as much as 7 mm, such as it was too on MI MIX 2 looks like that to me in terms of design, even worse phone with a bang)))

Post has been editedDimarikmavr - 02.02.19, 10:15

There is likely to be a drop. And a great chin.

Post has been editedxdimquax - 02.02.19, 16:42

Once I released Johans MX with great chin and completely without top ... almost looked unusual and I liked: yes2:

xdimquax , I am not so much afraid of the big chin, how much is too little top frame, which merges with the lateral dimensions. If a couple of millimeters to increase it, it would be ideal.

Running Redmi 7 approaching, so he got IMDA certification in Singapore
http://xchip.ru/2019/0...aciyu-imda-v-singapure

Post has been editedxdimquax - 09.02.19, 20:57

Provided Vivo U1 - a rival for Redmi 7, from $ 118

So, as I understand it, it did not really say anything about the appearance? I would like a fresh look for relatively inexpensive, even if feeble iron ... Does not matter bodies. only as a dialer, and pisalka modem needed, and the camera just to take pictures of a cat ... For 100 USD with a small screen with a drop from the brand would be quite nice ...

Boris_2016
The chamber would like to level pH 5;)
Well, most importantly the size, the smaller the better.

Boris_2016 drop is better than an eyebrow or is likely vkusovschina?

Appearance and so it is clear what will be, like Redmi Note 7, but with a few changes, depending on whether the dual camera is, for example. Another difference is in the materials can be. So size is going to be less.

If the design and proportions are by HOT-7 is ready to put up with 636 dragon and even with 6 "display and is not particularly feature-rich camera, and housing materials are not particularly important to me, but it would be a display of 5.8".

Dimarikmavr
What is the point of the display 5.8? If I would like a shovel, I would buy a pH5 or 7. A 5.45 screen is no more, and preferably less.

And I'm willing to put up with the design, if it is though to be 636. :-D

Karramiz Redmi 6 Pro shovel? And there 5.84.

Post has been editedxdimquax - 20.02.19, 00:27

xdimquax
I did not hold it in your hands. It would be desirable size of not more 6a and better 4a / 5a

Speak golden words!

Too large screens are molded into the Redmi folk line, if only because there is a line for "bigger" lovers - Redmi Note ...

Redmi 6 was good in size, but the battery and percent predetermined his fate ...

Karramiz I agree, 6A and 6 will be smaller.

luke88, because mold and that most do not care, look a hype surrounding Note 7.

Post has been editedxdimquax - 20.02.19, 07:31