Week 1: Day 0 - Day 7: 100% (-0)
Week 2: Day 8 - Day 14: 100% (-0)
Week 3: Day 15 - Day 21: 100% (-0)
Week 4: Day 22 - Day 28: 100% -80% (
-20)
Day 22: 100% (-0)
Day 23: missed
Day 24: 93% (-7/2)
Day 25: 90% (-3)
Day 26: 87% (-3)
Day 27: 83% (-4)
Day 28: 80% (-3)
Week 5: Day 29 - Day 35: 80% -56% (
-24)
Day 29: 76% (-4)
Day 30: 73% (-3)
Day 31: 70% (-3)
Day 32: 66% (-4)
Day 33: 63% (-3)
Day 34: 59% (-4)
Day 35: 56% (-3)
Week 6: Day 36 - Day 42: 56% -32% (-
24)
Day 36: 52% (-4)
Day 37: 49% (-3)
Day 38: 45% (-4)
Day 39: 42% (-3)
Day 40: 38% (-4)
Day 41: 35% (-3)
Day 42: 32% (-3)
Week 7: Day 43 - Day 49: 32% -8% (-
24)
Day 43: 28% (-4)
Day 44: 25% (-3)
Day 45: 22% (-3)
Day 46: 18% (-4)
Day 47: 15% (-3)
Day 48: 11% (-4) low charge warning
Day 49: 8% (-3)
Week 8: Day 50 - Day 56: 8% -5% (-
3)
Day 50: 5% (-3)
Day 51: 5% (-0)
Day 52: 5% (-0)
Day 53: 5% (-0)
Day 54: 5% (-0)
Day 55: 5% (-0)
Day 56: 5% (-0)
Week 9:
Day 57: 5% (-0)
Day 58: 5% (-0)
Day 59: 5% (-0)
Day 60: 5% (-0)
Day 61: 0% (-5)
Seriously?! 0.o
himself in shock
The first week was a horizontal flow schedule.
In the second week, the android stopped understanding what was happening. Writes "battery consumption unknown"
In the third week it became annoying
Fourth week made a surprise
The fifth week is a steady decline of nominally about 3.5% per day. If, as surveyors write, this trend continues to zero, then we can expect a total duration of such a life of 1 second of wakefulness per day — about 50 days. And this coincidentally returns to my original estimate: for a day of sleep, the reader should actually eat no more than 2% of the charge (regardless of what the indicator shows)
Eighth week: unexpected. Apparently, the story is similar to the previous generation of Monte Cristo, who lived on the last 1% for almost longer than the other 99%. Although I hope that the situation is not quite the same and my experiment will end soon. Still, a month in sleep mode already have exactly