Fint01 ,

To express your opinion about this BRANCH.
from which there is a negative to PDA from THESE TEROK
On the blue and not restful.

Post has been editedpaviel1806 - 29.12.18, 14:58

The words are correct, but there is always but ... Look, I came for help, they provided me with it, but help was given in the form

Why is this behavior, in its mass, inherent precisely to the administration / moderation? This can be expressed in the form of excessive pathos, self-conceit, arrogance when handling, greasy banter, and dozens of manifestations. I am sure there are altruists, but there are only a few of them. The greater mass, in fact, has more prosaic reasons. Self-affirm. On foot erotic such a helper. And I will certainly display my opinion in the form of reputation / user moderation(PySy: it turns out that this is a public discussion of the administration’s actions, about how ... Why then does the user have the opportunity to “correct” their reputation? In order to be able to conduct a punitive “act of self-affirmation” once again?). The problem is widespread, alas, a good part of the "instructors" are ill with this. Something like that, litter for confusion.

Post has been editedArkhip Sergeich - 30.12.18, 17:05

I do not agree at all. The abscess is so huge that it is impossible to do without "public hearings".

Post has been editedArkhip Sergeich - 29.12.18, 15:21

But after all, can this be closed ???
Or are we now breeding from the new and the rest, rudeness, insults, extortion of turnips, someone owes something to someone ??
But there are such people on the forum.

AND???

Post has been editedpaviel1806 - 29.12.18, 15:34

I don’t think so. This is one of the few things that I agree with in the strategy of the “new administration,” namely publicity, which may provide a solution.


Must respect. Everyone of everyone. This is the cornerstone. This is the “one of” that I am trying to bring.

Post has been editedArkhip Sergeich - 29.12.18, 15:44

it’s very interesting to know the criteria of professionalism in this matter, it seems that they, as they do not exist in principle, and do not have clear concepts, are the very stumbling block - “talk nothing”, “everyone has their own opinion”, “minerality is not that ... "," you do not understand what you are talking about, because I know everything, and - everything is exactly as it seems to me ... ": rolleyes:

In closed mode, only administrators and moderators would discuss. Even without this topic, they can do this in their own channel. So a discussion in the masses is needed.Only YOU are obligated to yourself, to be adequate. And then life itself will put everyone in the right directions.

Post has been editedFint01 - 29.12.18, 16:34

Fint01 , uh, you repomogatel !!! : angry:
[Sarcasm]


Post has been editedDenisGritsunov - 29.12.18, 17:10

anyone in the know will understand without further explanation - just by looking at the screen (assistant moderators, moderators, honorary). It was written for them.
You, as a curator, do not have to put a tag with the text: “I will punish the next person who writes the post”, because there is no power to punish. The point is to argue with you ...
Added by:
I'm sorry, I was wrong.
I thought that you quoted my words about unprofessionalism from another post, which, of course, you deleted, because he clearly proved that he was regarding this tag:


Post has been editedSergey Ivanovich - 29.12.18, 17:44

this is what determines the futility of the discussions raised in this topic ...
especially when you "circle the moon" in front of your opponent, and in the end you give out - "you are not supposed to know by status, but I tell you so, and nothing else, and this is the kitchen where - blah, blah, blah ... and you - in fact, no one, and there’s no way to call you ... but you - write, we will certainly find the time and honor ... ": D

You accidentally did not confuse the forums.
It seems like rudeness is not welcomed here.
I urge you to adhere to the culture of communication and not to go beyond the scope of Clause 1.6.

Was the quote quoted? ..

iNemoS * 45Ru ,
You are the Curator and you know that even the cited mat is a violation. Please refrain.

I understand you, and I’ll try not to do what you give as an example, but in my message it’s nothing more than an “example” that has nothing to do with the opponent or anyone else ...
if you think this is a violation - just delete ...
Thank you for following the topic ...

iNemoS * 45Ru ,
: thank_you: For your understanding.

Apparently, they have not yet analyzed whether it is necessary to do it as it should be (by internal instructions), as it is logical and convenient for users.
P.S. I am writing here because commenting on that topic would be a brazen offtopic. Will be sent back to the premiere :)

Post has been editedSergey Ivanovich - 29.12.18, 19:17

LeoMat
cons moderators demolished him.

Posted 12/29/2018 8:57 PM:


Dear, you are so recently on the forum, but you know everything, you understand everything.
Damn, I would go back to the moderators for half a day, I would find out whose you are a multinic ...: ph34r:

Post has been editedSergey Ivanovich - 29.12.18, 20:58

There is no former and real moderators. Moderator is a state of mind. : smile:

This is more about access to mod. Tools.
And believe me, if there is a cartoon, Sergey would find him. In this he has no equal and was not} -)

I do not doubt his abilities. : smile:

Post has been editedFint01 - 29.12.18, 21:15