Received the other day the original glass and is ready to describe your impressions in comparison with Nillkin XD CP + MAX. And the impressions were left very strange. From the point of view of the production technology, the original is specified by the original: the frame, the rubber band on the edge, oleopob, is all the same. The only visible difference is the frame under the cut, on the original, it is much already overlapped in this place not a single pixel (see the photo comparison). Overlapping of the working area by
Method with stripesAlmost significantly less, about 0.1-0.2 mm on each side. Visually - in general, no difference, as the scrollbar overlap in the chrome and overlaps. The size of the glass itself is the same, the covers sits as tightly as Nilkin. In the first opinion about Nilkin (Jakpoter, Jakpoter, I made a wonderful selection above, my reviews, too, wrote that it did not stick it on a silicone case - it was not true, it was necessary to press it a little more, with the original everything is identical. I also think that the original forms a slightly smaller slot along the edges, a slightly hardened is somewhat more complicated. But this is already a terrible subject, in fact: there is a gap for dust and there.
Total: a carnate frame under the cut at a price of 2-2.5 times more. If it does not scare a slight drinking glass from under the bar status - take Nilkin and do not bother. The original in the dry residue, cherry, better, but all his differences are a slight change in the template in production, there is nothing that the principle can increase the price.
P.S. With a glass of Nilkin, everything is in perfect order, I rejuvenated and removed back to the box, it is still useful.
Post has been editedKronus64 - 09.02.19, 21:46