Comparison of i5 8250u or i7 7500u processors



Rep: (0)
Good evening! help with the choice. I choose between Intel Core i5 8250U 1.6GHz nVidia GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB gddr5 and Intel Core i7 7500U 2.7GHz nVidia GeForce 940MX - 4096 MB ddr3. A laptop is needed for work, photo processing and simple video editing.



Rep: (6)
* finwione
I also offer Asus VivoBook 15 X510UA and BQ438 specifically (different screens and different hardware from the index), I am considering this model, close price, there are 2 RAM slots, but there is no lump.

Post has been editedGio-user - 28.03.18, 23:19



Rep: (1)
Weird question...
Everything is right there ark.intel.com/compare/124967,95451
In short, the fifth of the eighth generation is a year fresh, the UHD video core, the cache is one and a half times larger, 4 cores versus two are useful in ANY activity, even stupid hospitals (VK, OK) will respond faster)))
Well, like a price tag - the five are 25% cheaper !!

Post has been editedsergunok1900 - 01.04.18, 12:06



Rep: (0)
ACER A517-51G-56LL screen: 17.3 "; screen resolution: 1920 Г— 1080; matrix type: IPS; processor: Intel Core i5 8250U; frequency: 1.6 GHz (3.4 GHz, in Turbo mode); memory: 12288 MB, DDR4; HDD: 1000 GB; SSD: 128 GB; nVidia GeForce Mx150 - 2048 MB;
I bought this beech for the needs of video editing and video capture. Pinnacle Studio 15. 32bit As a result, rendering performance is lower than the 6-year-old i7 3610q. I connected the Pinnacle capture board -510usb to capture video. BUT The video stream goes on the screen in jerks with a hang. This was also on the old beech, but only when, in addition to the board, two more external hard drives were connected. What to do now?



Rep: (202)
So it should be lower in tests with a long-term load on the fpu block. Unless the gain from AVX2, which in the old one was not, but perhaps Pinnacle is not optimized for new sets of vector operations. It should also be remembered that the U series has only 12 pci-e 3.0 lines and all of them, including the MX150 graphics card (hanging on x4 pci-e 3.0), use one single 8GB QPI bus. And the HQ series of video hangs on separate 16x pci-e, and the DMI bus is responsible for the peripherals, which is 2 times slower than QPI. What were you thinking when buying a low-voltage device that is only strong in pulsed operation — surfing, office (here it’s almost as smart as the i7 7700HQ). 8250u can be used as a full-fledged 4 core, but then it should be quickly configured for a TDP of 25W, not 15 and the installed CO should be designed for a TDP of 35W +. Nobody puts this, except for a couple of tops at a completely different price ...



Rep: (0)
Thank you for such an exhaustive answer.
but many parameters are not clear to me.
WHICH CONFIGURATION would you recommend?
within 50tys
can take a beech on i5 7300hq. He is at 45 watts.
there is such a config
screen: 15.6 "; screen resolution: 1920 Г— 1080; processor: Intel Core i5 7300HQ; frequency: 2.5 GHz (3.5 GHz, Turbo mode); memory: 8192 MB, DDR4; HDD: 1000 GB, 5400 rpm; nVidia GeForce GTX 1050 - 2048 MB; WiFi; Bluetooth; HDMI; WEB-camera; ...

Post has been editedgvkrylov - 16.04.18, 21:02



Rep: (202)
For your purposes, you must either wait for the release of laptops with i5 8400H (it is faster than 7700HQ) or take a full-fledged i7, the same Dell 7577 with heavy CO, but it will already cost somewhere in the region of 65-68k, with an SSD + 8GB bar, even if you take the cheapest option in red. At least there will be at least a full mincemeat from the ports and complete sharpening for long-term installation loads. Coffee pots will reach Russia at best in July, after the mundial. It may happen that our trade will not be specially ordered until the fall, in order to sell the old, more inhibitory and expensive stuff, and even in the holiday season, when you can’t cut prices anyway, there is no demand. After all, the i5 8400H costs $ 130 cheaper than the i7 7700HQ according to Intel. Almost all new laptops will already be with HDMI 2.0a, minimum with Thunderbolt 3.0, as in Dell 7577. Due to the growth of the exchange rate, there is no certainty that the ruble prices for new laptops with cheaper and more efficient coffiles will be less than current prices at the minimum available options with the i7 7700HQ.



Rep: (0)
I managed to pass the laptop.
Now I stand before assembling the syst block.
which percent is preferable to AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or INTEL Core i5 8400, to fit in 45-50 thousand. It will be used mainly for video editing and file conversion. I don’t play games. If it’s not difficult, collect an example system.
percent, mother, memory, V. card is not a game, ssd for the system and prog, I think 100GB is enough. HDD 1T., Power supply ...
thank.



Rep: (0)
I got myself 5770. There are no flickers, on Linux.
There is a glare on black in the lower left corner.
Everything. I use it.



Rep: (202)
No flicker, on Linux.

Very "useful" infa to the rest, without specifying a matrix meaningless. It has long been known to everyone that 5770 has 3 matrices. Two do not flicker, LG / AU, one flickers - CHI MEI. Obviously you have one of the first two. And non-flare even on matrices with multi-row illumination. This is how the Chinese assembled screens. Linux is not at all here.



Rep: (0)
AU matrix



Rep: (5)
Tell me which one is better than the i5-8250u or i7-7500u with the MX150, for working with Photoshop 3D graphics, etc.

Post has been editedTechmin13 - 12.05.18, 19:50



Rep: (133)
* Techmin13,
8250u should be better.



Rep: (5)
But in general, normally pull such programs?



Rep: (202)
Techmin13 @ 05/12/18, 20:10*
But in general, normally pull such programs?

Pull. During long-term operation, as the i5 8250U has been written more than once, it is about 25% slower than the i7 7700HQ. In a pulsed load (10-20 sec), it is as fast as the 7700.



Rep: (5)
* Sw-777,
and then i7 7700HQ or i7 8550u?



Rep: (202)
About the same thing. 8550U in the presence of the same CO as 8250, sometimes it even merges into a long-term one. On the pulse side, it is a bit faster than 7700. In general, that wasted money, it’s better to invest this difference of $ 100 in either + 8GB of memory or in SSD 250, having bought them separately. Photoshop is very greedy for memory bandwidth. And it directly depends on the correct two-channel - only 4 + 4, 8 + 8, 16 + 16 memory configs are correct. This will give a greater effect than 8250 vs 8550 in Photoshop. And if you need full power, you need to wait for the i5 8400H, it is faster than the 7700 in everything, or take 6 core.



Rep: (5)
* Sw-777,
In short, is it better to take the i5 8250U with MX150 and 8g DDDR4 and buy the same RAM bar?
for example thishttps: //www.dns-shop.r...seryj/characteristics/
or already take Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro 15.6 with i5

Post has been editedTechmin13 - 13.05.18, 13:35



Rep: (56)
Techmin13 @ 05/13/18, 10:19*
In short, is it better to take the i5 8250U with MX150 and 8g DDDR4 and buy the same RAM bar?

Class! The people printed, printed, and then a man comes and says: "In short!" : rofl:
No, in short it will not work here. It may become that you will spit. And above, one of these cases is pretty damn well described when “it’s shorter to take a better i5 8250U” was a solution, to put it mildly, reckless.



Rep: (93)
Hello everyone, I want to buy a box like this:http://s.aliexpress.com/z2Q7VfyA?fromSns=Plusthere are 2 options 8250u and 8550u. It will be used for chrome in 2 monitors with a bunch of tabs basically, well, sometimes 4k video play on telly. I will buy one or two slats for it on 16GB of operative ddr4 2400 and m2 ssd. Will such a device go?
And with a price difference of 50 percent (not critical), what should I take?


Full version    

Help     rules

Now: 08/15/19, 07:43