[X]Assistant

[ARKAN P]

пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ Huawei Mate 10 / 10pro download

Huawei Mate 10, BLA-L09, BLA-L29, BLA-AL00, ALP-L09, ALP-L29, ALP-AL00
Description | Pro Description |Discussion пїЅ | Firmware пїЅ | Purchase пїЅ | Accessories пїЅ | Camera talk

• In the subject are allForum RulesandSub rules;
  
• Useful topics to note:Forum FAQ | How to clean the image under the spoiler | List of topics in the "Photo" section
  
• The main rule of the section: issues not related to the camera are discussed in the relevant topics on the device;
  
• Instead of saying “Thank you!” Use. If you have less than 15 posts - click on the button.under the message where they helped you, and write thanks.
  

Camera specifications

Main camera:
Camera type: Double with Leica Summilux-H f / 1.6 optics
Resolution: 12Mp Color (Imx 386) + 20Mp Monochrome (presumably Imx 350)
Optical Stabilization: There is
Flash: Dual LED
Autofocus: Hybrid (Combines 4 types of focus)
Video recording: 1080p @ 30fps, 1080p @ 60fps, 2160p @ 30fps
Features: Dual hybrid zoom, AI scene recognition system
Front-camera:
Resolution: 8mp
Optical stabilization: Not
Flash: Yes (screen backlight)
Autofocus: No (fixed focus)
Video recording: 1080p @ 30fps

Camera reviews

• First photos on cameraMate 10
  
• Comparison withGalaxy Note 8 пїЅ WITHLG V30 пїЅ WITHPixel 2XL пїЅ CMate 9
  
• Iphone x, Mate 10, S8
  
• IP 8+, Mate 10pro, Note 8, Pixel 2XL
  
• OpinionDXOmarkabout camera
  
  

Examples of photos from members of the forum

FromLerian

• Comparison withS8 +
  
• Mate 10,S8 +, G4, Note 4
  
• Mate 10, Mate 8, S8 +
  
• HDR example
  
• A couple of nightly examples пїЅ Still
  
• Macro
  
• Mate 10vsS8 +at night
  

Fromse555es

• Mate 9 pro, Mate 10, Sony XZ premium
  
• Comparison withIphone 7 plus
  

FromGrigorij

• Just a photo
  

Fromsnogtikov

• A couple of pictures in Raw пїЅ Still
  

Fromdimulique

• Photo examples
  

FromARKAN P

• Night examples пїЅ Still
  
• From the plane
  
• Macro
  

FromDobrodukh

• IP7, Mate 10, S8
  
• Some more examples
  

Fromzhivoder

• Mate 10vsNote 8
  

FromRusya

• LG G4, Iphone, Mate 9, Mate 10 пїЅ Still
  

Fromjekairk

• Photo examples
  

Fromblacky_rabbit

• A couple of nightly examples
  

FromRoma_of_6_wagon

• Couple shots + selfie пїЅ Still пїЅ Additive
  

FromAlexander 1st

• Photo review from Rome

Video examples

• FromRusya пїЅ Still
  
• Fromnotatempnick
  

miscellanea

• Screenshots of manual settings
  
• Great comparison fromandreym999 пїЅ Originals
  

Attention! If you want to share your examples of photos, please do it throughGoogle driveorYandex.Disk.
There the photos are not compressed, they load faster and they are much more convenient to watch, Thank you!

Post has been editedAndrewP_1 - 11.04.19, 21:44

Reason for editing: Photo review from Alexander 1st

[Rusya]

Lerian @ 11/19/17 17:49

The picture that the old LG G4 gives me is much more pleasant to my eye personally, without going into details of the manual settings.

Yes, for God's sake, who argues, firstly, there are two G4s at hand (red and burgundy), secondly, then it is necessary to lay out pairs from a ski and from a huavey, and even for myself, to see what settings one and the other - if this is not interesting, then it may be possible to get rid of an apparatus that does not suit something. Only the same G4, which everyone still loves, only for a photo, isn’t there anymore))) how many updates have there been since the launch? Although, if the manufacturer gave the opportunity to photograph with manual settings and do not want to use them? - This is for fans of stub. And in such conditions, shooting "generous" to get will not work with a magnificent 1.4 hole and inch matrix! - We can meet, I will give a click on such a soap box =) And up to such characteristics phones will grow another five years, probably)))

[Lerian]

Rusya,
I use my hands and feet for the manual settings))) Only with the help of them you can get acceptable photos, especially on mobile phones. I express my opinion about the photos taken with the Mate 10 camera, which gained 97 points in DXOMark. Judging by this, the quality should be good enough, but in fact there is nothing outstanding, just like everyone else. . And if the phone comes out with a camera that I especially like, I will definitely consider it for purchase. I have no complaints about Mate 10, I have a very good attitude towards Huawei, but if such a good camera was declared, then it should correspond to these statements - I saw the photo and immediately felt the difference compared to other competitors.

[Roma_of_6_wagon]

SyncMaster931 @ 11/19/17, 9:39 PM

I, by the way, also, in the review on YouTube, the photos on the mat of 10/10 pro and on Note 8 did not seem to be in favor of Huawei ..

I do not understand - why did everyone decide that Mate10 should tear up the Note8 or the Bite on the “English flag” ?!
What he shoots at their level is a little better somewhere, a little worse somewhere - this is an achievement.
DXomark is not the last resort either.

I personally don’t especially believe in updates for the camera.
For p9, all updates did not fundamentally change anything.

[Rusya]

Lerian @ 11/19/17, 18:24

I express my opinion about the photos taken with the Mate 10 camera, which gained 97 points in DXOMark. Judging by this, the quality should be good enough, but in fact there is nothing outstanding, just like everyone else. .

Ah ha! Trust in the DRL, and do not believe their hands! You (now) hoped to ski recently, so as not to be unfounded, I’ll give you a simple example of how she took pictures and still does it when there is a lack of light (otherwise few people know what a low-light is, it’s more important to buy which case)
in the machine (approximate settings, the huavei put as many as 1200 iso on your pictures, 800 here) and with manual settings (iso 100), a ski in which, you kind of mentioned it with details, and everything else is just fine:

LG G4

therefore, he proposed to compare pairs, not to paid sources and other “objective” reviewers, to refer when you have the opportunity to take pictures yourself, and not just remember how good it was in the ski!)))
I am writing, for the sake of objectivity, for those who are at a crossroads and very much now depend on the opinions of real owners when choosing a new gadget for themselves!)))
_{.. open photos in a separate window and watch, certainly not from the smart screen - this is for inexperienced forum users)))}

Post has been editedRusya - 20.11.17, 01:17

[VIPerMic]

Regarding the shooting, it is more annoying to the fact that with the 9th model the 4: 3 format used for the 20Mp shooting became the priority, and the secondary (12Mp) format, 16: 9, became secondary.
Huawei does not comment on this "chip". What for? Who is looking at 4: 3 images at all, what kind of monitors, what these screens are, all the more, they themselves pulled Pro in a ratio of 18: 9.

[A4j]

VIPerMic @ 11/20/17

There are hundreds of such phones,

You chose the screen resolution, not the sensor. All phones have a full-resolution camera sensor with a 4: 3 ratio, I don’t know phones with a 16: 9 sensor.

VIPerMic @ 11/20/17

Is it convenient for you to view photos of maximum resolution (20MP), cropped on the screen of your smartphone or computer monitor?

The ratio of photos from the monitor does not depend. As an example in instragram 1: 1 ratio, who saw such monitors?
I believe that the photos should be on the entire sensor, and themselves cut as it should. And then they shoot 16: 9, then they ask to print some photos, and cut to the ratio of paper 1: в€љ2. Do you know how much information is lost from the original frame? Here are so many:

At the same time, if they were shooting at 4: 3, they would have lost quite a bit:

Photo used from dimulique.
The truth is, I'm about sore, now few people print photos. If this is not necessary, perhaps the solution is simply not to think about a lower resolution with a different aspect ratio, since manufacturers do not make 16: 9 matrices, only 4: 3, for budget cameras, though there are not budget ones with such a ratio, and 3: 2 for cameras priced above average, it just so happened in the photo.

wolfhound88 @ 11/20/17,

So look for devices with 16 MP camera

Not right, I have Alcatel Idol 4S, a 16 MP camera, in full resolution shoots 4: 3.

Post has been editedA4j - 20.11.17, 17:37

[ARKAN P]

wolfhound88, wolfhound88,
So be it, I will be the first, as long as no one wants)) Chur, do not kick much for everything is purely my personal opinion, ess-nno.
So, rushed ...

Above I wrote that the camera, in my amateurish look, is just super! During the day, it removes so little that a smartphone can do better (in general, at the moment all flagships do not fake during the day), so I mostly posted nightly shots / commented.

[ARKAN P]

I use the device only the 5th day, so there are not very many pictures. Almost everything laid out here was filmed on the first day of purchase in the evening. On the machine without any preparation and often on the go.

Night, street, lantern, pharmacy ... and everything is clear;)

Pay attention to the windows in the buildings across the street, where the interior is viewed! And this at night, in the presence of a sickly backlight ...

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 21:59

Reason for editing: Error

[ARKAN P]

A few more shots on the go, from discharge - hands are freezing, give it tosavagemessiahzine.comtake a picture of a couple of shots))

On the move clack clack

In the last two shots, there is no street lighting at all! Pay attention to these pictures in detail - everything is visible inside the cabin.

Posted on 11/25/2017 12:29 PM:

Also on the go, but from the car

Shot through the glass with one hand. In another wheel)

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 22:00

[ARKAN P]

From the plane night city

From the plane

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 22:01

Reason for editing: not under spoiler

[ARKAN P]

Here is a characteristic (for a well-removing apparatus) snapshot.

Backlight from the window directly into the camera

All details and color on the spot: hairs on the dog, etc. Even in the house opposite you can look in the windows.

Posted on 11/25/2017 12:56 PM:

Well, for a close up macro

Macro

Here, as well as in the afternoon without comments ...

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 22:01

[saneklad]

wolfhound88 @ 11/23/17 10:49

Let the owners try to remove the info through the adb here and search in the received IMX file

IMX386DUALHYBIRD_LG

[Lerian]

Macro shoots the body quite well, small details are clearly visible - readable letters on the lines of the bill, on sample numbers.

Post has been editedLerian - 25.11.17, 15:43

[Roma_of_6_wagon]

Camera 360. Stuck cool. KMK its main use is some amazing views of nature. Because At close range, the details are clearly not enough. But the beauty is to shoot the very thing - if I had such a device somewhere in the Verdon canyon, where eagles fly in flocks underfoot or in the same area of ​​the casino in Monte Carlo with its vanity fair, great shots could be made there.

For good photos from this camera you need a selfie stick or remote control, so that the face of the photographer and his hands do not occupy the first place.

Awesome panorama mode + gyroscope. When a photo is scrolled not by a finger, but by moving the phone, i.e. To see a circular panorama through the frame of the phone, you need to turn around your axis, in order to see the sky - you need to pick up the phone ... You need to turn it up))))

If you go further in this direction, you need a more powerful camera, but this one justifies your 100 Euros completely, especially 100 euros as a bonus to the phone.

P.S. Moderator moved my post here. It would be more correct to have accessories, but too lazy to develop activity in this direction))))

Post has been editedRoma_of_6_wagon - 25.11.17, 19:29

[Roma_of_6_wagon]

ARKAN P @ 11.25.17, 15:43

Afiget, just AFI.G.E.T.b! Sorry, emotions O_o But to go nuts, zhezh?
Already love Maytushka 10th))

My humble IMHO.
The experience is only one day, but nonetheless ..
You can praise the device as you like, but the traditional chip of the Hughes - with the darkening of the frames remains. Also in auto-mode, the focus is worse than when tapping the screen. This is in low light. To be honest, I don’t see any difference with p9 at all. Well, that is without enthusiasm.
This does not mean that any other phone will do much better - I just personally, waited for more)))
In a darkened room, the clearest photos are obtained at the lowest resolution of 6 megapixels and forced tapes in the area, the detail of which is needed.

[ARKAN P]

Roma_f_6_wagon @ 11/25/17, 11:30 pm

This does not mean that any other phone will do much better - I just personally, waited for more)))

I agree 100%
When expectations are high, the object of expectations is usually more difficult to meet. Perhaps (even most likely) I am not so picky about the possibilities of shooting on smartphones in general, therefore we have different emotions;)
About tap on the screen, thanks! Indeed, it is better to remove the blackout.

[Roma_of_6_wagon]

ARKAN P @ 11.25.17, 20:30

When expectations are high, the object of expectations is usually more difficult to meet. Perhaps (even most likely) I am not so picky about the possibilities of shooting on smartphones in general, therefore we have different emotions

Offtop

I specifically opened the pictures 7 years ago with a fairly cheap "soap box". Shooting indoors, with a complex light and with a picture size of 1 MB, what a chic clarity and color reproduction is. This is of course 200% off-top, but click on the increase and see the difference ...

On the first photo of Bugatti from PORCESA, there are 1 pc. True. From porcelain. Of course, only external panels.
on the second, the Wiessman brand who died in the Bose, alive is just a “sekas”, or ratherSEKAS ))))

I thought about the need for a small soap box with fast and basic loading of photos into the phone.
I looked at the Yandex market ... what I like - it costs 40 ty. Gone to think further)))))))
P.S. There was a Sonkovsky device QX100 in the form of an overhead lens on a smart, but it is no longer sold ...

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 22:02

Reason for editing: Spoiler

[skusha]

Yes, Huawei "huaveit" pictures, i.e. "watercolor" by own recipe. Is that good? ... Oh no. Is that bad? ... Yes, it seems, too, no. Since this approach is designed for the fact that no one will look at full resolution, and compressed for social networks and other mobile Internet - they look just great ... IMHO, of course ...

Post has been editedskusha - 26.11.17, 04:45

[Grigorij]

iPhone X vs Mate 10 vs S8 video and photo sample 4K UHD (Low light)

Post has been editedwolfhound88 - 02.12.17, 22:05

[MD-Garry]

Found such a bug, for me it is. When shooting video, if you click on the screen, you get static focusing, well, but if you change the subject of the shooting, it lags behind, the AI ​​somehow does not understand this: D