[X]Assistant

[gabby]

Communicator talkRoverPC X7
Description RoverPC X7 | Discussion пїЅ | Firmware пїЅ | Accessories пїЅlFAQ

Useful topics:

______________Registry tweaks______________Windows Mobile FAQ______________BB Codes Forum______________

пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ! пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ "пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ" пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ. пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ 15 пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ, пїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ "пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ" пїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ, пїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅ пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ. download

Post has been editedKUKUndrik - 29.08.16, 14:30

[Ded mazday]

On the officialthe siteRover announced the new communicator RoverPC X7



The prototype for the OEM development of the X7 served"Wacke" by SIM
Judging by the preliminary characteristics, this is an advanced heir to the Rover N6:
operating systemWindows Mobile 6.1 Professional
CPUMarvell PXA310, 624 MHz
ROM256MB
Ram128MB
Screen3.2 ”QVGA TFT, resolution 240x320, 65 thousand colors
SlotsMicro SD (SDHC)
Interfacesmini USB 2.0 Full Speed, 2.5mm headset jack
Connection:

• GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
  
• GPRS
  
• Edge
  
• Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR
  
• Wi-Fi 802.11 b / g
  
• FM receiver
  

BatteryLi-Ion, 1500mAh
waiting time:150 hours
talk time:4 hours
Dimensions121 * 65.5 * 17 mm
Weight132g.
Camera2.0 MP, macro
GPSbuilt

Post has been editedpaladin7 - 08.10.08, 23:51

[Tigertwins]

The main question for me is that the display is as blind in the sun as in the Rover n6

[Ded mazday]

The screen is made "flush", a la HTC Touch
On some resources it is claimed that the camera has a flash, but this is not visible in the photos ...

Post has been editedDed mazday - 11.07.08, 20:39

[Sh.Kutusha]

If the screen is the same as that of the N6, neither the reinforced percents nor the memory capacity of the device will save them.

[1Deskjet1]

Come on guys! A footnote in favor of the screen can be made exactly on the power !! I think the device is just perfect in the confrontation of price-quality-characteristics !!! I already plan to take !!! Just wait too long !!! A device with such a proc and operative for such money is no where to find except Rover !! So draw your own conclusions !!))))))))

[Ded mazday]

VGA is not needed if it is stupid, as in the X650
And all the delights of VGA are revealed, for good, on a diagonal of 3.5-3.7
And energy communicator with VGA maybe more spending

Another thing, what is the quality of X7 QVGA ...

Added @ 12.07.2008, 08:18

According toRover forumrecommended price at the start of sales - 13990r.

Post has been editedDed mazday - 12.07.08, 08:14

[Tigertwins]

The difference in price between the Rover n6 and x7 does not allow to hope for improvement
readability in the sun. What value
has a display size if not possible
see the info on it. Or it is a communicator for indoor use only. I cannot accept
exclamations about performance only because the processor is 624 MHz, the n6 processor has 416 MHz, but it is much less productive than the same Asus525
with the same process.

[Fendy]

Tigertwins, you're talking about Formula 1 or about kmk.
: lol: Or do stream computations flow through? H6 has another chipset -SIM548. And it is quite enough for the immediate needs, even an unconverted video to watch with comfort. I agree with the display, because it is rather weak in n6, or rather, the substrate brings it. Let us hope that in X7 this deficiency will be corrected.

[nekras5]

http://m.youtube.com/details?desktop_uri=%..le.loc&locale=en_UShere's a rover control shell video

[sinigam]

Damn, I want a patch on my n6 :) made b share we change n6 to x7 with a surcharge :)

[Wunschkind]

sinigam,

Damn, I want a patch on my n6 :) made b share we change n6 to x7 with an additional charge

Rover support sends to***even when requesting battery. Like, buy a new phone, or live with a dead battery. And you want this exchange. Throw that you ...
Fendy,

Stream computing produce sploshnyakom? H6 has another chipset -SIM548. And it is quite enough for the immediate needs, even an unconverted video to watch with comfort.

Psx! On my rover 520 MHz - even enough for simultaneous playback of sound through A2DP and the installation of a heavy program WITHOUT THE SMALLEST BRAKES! And these are two extremely resource-intensive applications! (Which, by the way, the average 400 MHz percents do not pull. I checked. Either the sound is choked or the installation is dull.)
IMHO, increasing the frequency above 500 (and often 400, an ordinary user, and this is enough) megahertz -marketing ploy!Above is already the beginning of the frequency of the probe, and hence the precious battery charge is empty! Do not get fooled by the blunt extensive frequency increase, do not be children!

!

4.9. It is forbidden to use obscene language, both explicit and hidden, including special characters.
RO two days

Post has been editedgabby - 09.10.08, 11:29

[Krab1]

Well, probably there they will do it like for example on gigabytes or somewhere else that the frequency automatically rises under load and it will be possible to select modes like economical turbo or automatic .... then by the way 400 MHz 400 MHz disagreement such as TI OMAP At least 600 MHz pack compared to the 400 MHz of MArvell, for example, the same Diamond, like 528 MHz, and evaluate the video playback test:

http://mobile-review.com/pda/review/image/...re-player-2.png

on this not in megahertz happiness but in the brand of protsa I think so)))

[AnuB1s]

1. A gigabyte of mw998 from the test, there is an intel2700g so that the cp when playing a video practically does not involve the entire load on the accelerator.
2. I rover percent pxa310 which is better with power consumption compared to pxa270 and at the same time, the performance is higher at the same frequencies.

[sinigam]

Rover's support sends to x # nd even when the battery is requested. Like, buy a new phone, or live with a dead battery. And you want this exchange. Throw that you ...

Already dream will not give :)

IMHO, increasing the frequency above 500 (and often 400, an ordinary user and this is enough) megahertz - a marketing ploy! Above is already the beginning of the frequency of the probe, and hence the precious battery charge is empty! Do not get fooled by the blunt extensive frequency increase, do not be children!

Well, yes, the percentages are essentially the same, and I used to 624 to overclock it - the battery only gets that way, and the difference is not that special. But here's a 3d axel they could shove there, that would be the theme :)

[kerby]

I already want this device! It has long been waiting for someone with such parameters to release something. AUSUS released and that the memory is a little screen is drowned, I got used to control with my fingers, and the price is not adequate.
And the rover did the job. I am the first in line: lol: Who will tell how rovers often break? How are they with the service?
Thank!

Post has been editedkerby - 19.07.08, 21:50

[sinigam]

Judging by n6, there will be glitches in the first versions of the firmware. And some copies will be with a marriage, for example, the gps module will fall off in a week. But you can change it back, and the firmware will be released later.
No service, Akum or stylus to get is false, and in general there are almost no goods for this model.
This is so disappointing, but it is in spite of everything :)

[Igor96]

Finally, the communicator for a real man! Exceeding in power my HP4700!
Highest power, full stuffing with brutal male design.
In September, I will again switch to a VM communicator from Nokia N95.

[Ded mazday]

Sinigam 07/19/08 1:46:15 PM

Judging by n6, there will be glitches in the first versions of the firmware. And some copies will be with a marriage, for example, the gps module will fall off in a week.

The rover itself produces nothing.
SIM, whose OEM development is X7, showed itself from a good side.

[Ronax]

on the same rover forum they say that at their meeting, which will take place on July 26th, the device will be shown alive.

[Igor96]

I do not understand what is the actual problem? Of the 624 MHz of the first processor to make 400 MHz, there are no difficulties, at least 104 MHz, and the supply has never been superfluous ...