[X]Assistant

[Azzurro sky]

Our achievements in Mi Fit

Mi Band talk пїЅ | Purchase Mi Band пїЅ | Mi Band 2 talk пїЅ | Purchase Mi Band 2 пїЅ | Mi Band 2 firmware пїЅ | Android app пїЅ | IOS application пїЅ | Xiaomi Mi Smart Scale пїЅ | Huami Amazfit Bip пїЅ | Xiaomi

пїЅпїЅпїЅпїЅ download

пїЅ | Exchange of QR codes by Xiaomi Mi Band owners пїЅ


I think it will be interesting to find out from whom what achievements,)

Post has been editedAzzurro sky - 24.02.19, 02:53

Reason for editing: Topic name

[Azzurro sky]

MSK197, my statistics can be ignored. Rather, I no longer participate in competitions,)

[theAvalanche]

I'm in the top ten, although at the weekend the bracelet quietly and peacefully rested from me: rolleyes :: girl_crazy:

[Maksim fruit]

Azzurro Sky @ 11.10.17, 20:26

my statistics can be ignored

You can not take into account.
However, it is worth noting that the results are very decent (this week so far the first place is 65,882 steps in three days), both for yourself and for motivation
participants.

Post has been editedMSK197 - 12.10.17, 12:15

[Azzurro sky]

MSK197,
the problem with the leg so far makes itself felt .. need to fully recover)

[Maksim fruit]

Week 41 Results 2017

41st week of 2017

[theAvalanche]

MSK197,good result :)

[Dimsonspb]

MSK197, why do I have 0 steps for Saturday and Sunday? I don’t understand

[theAvalanche]

[email protected], 23:26

MSK197, why do I have 0 steps for Saturday and Sunday? I don’t understand

even without these steps (I haven’t been wearing a bracelet for the last time) on the 11th place with 39.6km, and at 10m - a person with 35.9 o.O: rtfm:
although this is quite easily explained by the fact that the distance the bracelet shows is inaccurate (especially if someone with a height of 160cm sets a step length of 90cm).

Post has been editedtheAvalanche - 16.10.17, 23:38

[Assassin225]

TheAvalanche @ 10.16.17, 23:36

will set a stride length of 90cm

Is it possible to set the stride length? I don’t have such a function.

[Assassin225]

I believe that it is better to allocate places by distance, rather than the number of steps. Because in distance it will be exactly the same.
Because it is possible to divide 10 km and the same distance with small steps, but with a quick step (the step will be longer) - the total number of steps is less - at the same distance. Here I am talking about.
And physical activity in the second case is greater. Not to mention running - there the difference will be enormous ... And the person who runs these 10 km will be lower than the one who walks the same distance on foot.
This is obvious, agree? Really no one wondered how and what the bracelet thinks?
Therefore, I ask for an amendment to our weekly achievements, namely, to take into account not by the number of steps, but by mileage. Who agrees? And what does the creator of this group himself think?

Posted on 10/16/2017, 23:52:

MSK197,
Do you agree?

Post has been editedAssassin225 - 17.10.17, 00:21

[Azzurro sky]

Assassin225, then it will be much more accurate and reliable to estimate by gps)

[Assassin225]

Azzurro Sky @ 10.17.17, 00:17

gps

Mi 2 because there is no gps, and the phone is not always with you. Are you in favor of tracking progress by mileage, not by steps?

[Azzurro sky]

Assassin225, I'm basically talking about gps,) I used to use Runkeeper. and probably kilometers are closer to me.)

[Maksim fruit]

[email protected], 23:26

Why do I have 0 steps for Saturday and Sunday? I don’t understand

Apparently, the program provided data late.
Corrected.

[Assassin225]

MSK197,
Skyshould be in 2nd place, because distance traveled more. And this is more important, and besidesmore preciselythan the number of steps! In this situation, it will be possible to specifically “wind up” glasses (steps) - to take small steps ...

Post has been editedAssassin225 - 17.10.17, 11:26

[Assassin225]

• If you walk ~ 7.5 km in the usual step, then there will be ~ 10,000 steps.
  
• If you run ~ 7.5 km, then there will be ~ 7500 steps.

The distance covered is the same, but the person who ran did more physical work - therefore, should be higher in the ranking.
So much fairer. Am I wrong? :)

Posted on 10/17/2017, 11:41:

MSK197,
Do you support this point of view?

Post has been editedAssassin225 - 17.10.17, 11:46

[Maksim fruit]

Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51

better allocate places by distance

Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51

Because in distance it’s just the same it will be more accurate

What will be more accurate?

Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51

can be divided by small steps of 10 km and the same distance, but by a quick step (the step will be longer) - the total number of steps is less - at the same distance. Here I am talking about.

Since the bracelet does not have gps, it seems that he can determine the distance by the product of the number of steps by the average length of the user's step (depending on the height, frequency of steps, etc.)
So, we can assume that small steps increasing the number of steps also increase the distance traveled, because the bracelet does not see how much distance we go.

Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51

And physical activity in the second case is greater.

Objectively, the unit load per user should be considered a step, since users of different growths (and, most likely, different step lengths) will walk the same distance with a different number of steps, respectively, getting a different load.
Example:
A participant 2 meters tall (step = 1 meter) will walk 10 km., Completing 10’000 steps.
A participant 1.6 meters tall (step = 0.7 meters) will go the same 10 km, having already completed 14’285 steps.
Or a Participant 1.6 meters tall, having completed 10’000 steps, will pass only 7 km.
In our opinion, both participants will get a more equal load after completing 10’000 steps (albeit a different distance) than by going the same distance but making a significantly different number of steps.
Therefore, we attach ourselves to the step, as a more basic unit of load, and apply the distance for more advanced statistics of each participant.

Everything is quite relative - both steps and kilometers in general show human activity., With an approximate comparison of activity with other participants.

Therefore, we recommend comparing your performance with the best performance of other participants in order to focus on them, improving your achievements.
And also every week try to improve their performance.

For example, because of my high growth and wide step, according to accurate gps data (the quotient of the distance to the number of steps), I have a step of more than 1 meter.

step length 110 cm.

.
For 41 weeks, according to the bracelet, I did:
- 112 thousand steps, but only 88 km passed.
But in fact, 112 thousand steps need to be multiplied by the step length, i.e. in fact, the distance should have been at least 112 km.

In any case, you should not be upset about steps or kilometers - take these indicators as an average indicator of activity - and the more active we are, the better!

Posted on 10/17/2017, 11:53:

Assassin225 @ 10.17.17, 11:24

distance traveled more. And this is more important

A child 1 meter tall and an uncle 2 meters tall will have different distances to get the same load, taking the same number of steps.

[Assassin225]

MSK197 @ 10.17.17, 11:50

So, it can be assumed that small steps increasing the number of steps also increase the distance traveled

Of course not. It’s not your first day to wear a bracelet?
That's why he and a smart bracelet - determines everything accurately, with a small error (like any device).

[Maksim fruit]

Assassin225 @ 10.17.17, 11:40

If you walk ~ 7.5 km in the usual step, then there will be ~ 10,000 steps.
If you run ~ 7.5 km, then there will be ~ 7500 steps.
The distance covered is the same, but the person who ran did more physical work - therefore, should be higher in the ranking.
So much fairer. Am I wrong?

The primary function of the bracelet is to take into account the number of steps (and only then, multiplying by the step length, approximately give out the distance).

Therefore, here you need to build on the steps:

If you take 10,000 steps, it will be 7.5 km. (10000 x 0.75)
And if you run 10,000 steps, then most likely there will be 7.5 km (10000 x 0.75)
And if you go in small steps of 10,000 steps - then, most likely, there will again be 7.5 km (10000 x 0.75)

Posted on 10/17/2017, 12:00:

Assassin225 @ 10.17.17, 11:56

That's why he and a smart bracelet - determines everything accurately, with a small error (like any device).

Surprisingly, yes!

[Assassin225]

MSK197 @ 10.17.17, 11:59

If you take 10,000 steps, it will be 7.5 km. (10000 x 0.75)
And if you run 10,000 steps, then most likely there will be 7.5 km (10000 x 0.75)
And if you go in small steps of 10,000 steps - then, most likely, there will again be 7.5 km (10000 x 0.75)

Rave. Everything will be different, but not 7.5 km everywhere.
I’m wondering. Didn’t you notice how the bracelet works?

MSK197 @ 10.17.17, 11:50

Objectively, the unit load per user should be considered a step, since users of different growths (and, most likely, different step lengths) will walk the same distance with a different number of steps, respectively, getting a different load.

And what, that they have different stride lengths? After all, they have a different growth then.
And if the growth is the same, then this is already there, then what I spoke about as an example of running, i.e. some of them will go more steps for the same distance. Please understand :)

Post has been editedAssassin225 - 17.10.17, 12:05