[X]Assistant

[fuel]

Deepoon E3 (DPVR E3)

• In the subject are allForum Rules | Section Rules;
  
• Useful topics to note:Forum FAQ | How to clean the image under the spoiler;
  
• Instead of saying “Thank you!” Use. If you have less than 15 posts - click on the button.under the message where you were helped, and write thanks;
  
• In the absence of the curator, the moderator fills the topic header. Use the buttonon the message, which, in your opinion, you need to add to the header to contact the moderator.
  

Device photos

Device description

Deepoon E3 (DPVR E3) - VR helmet for PC from China, competitor HTC Vive and Oculus Rift. Second after HTC Vive helmet with SteamVR tracking support. The very initial version of Deepoon E3 Basic (Deepoon E3B) includes only a helmet without base stations and controllers. The full version of Deepoon E3 with controllers and base stations is only available in China. Currently, only a helmet without controllers and position tracking is available for ordering in Russia. Deepoon E3-B version with AMOLED 2.5K sensor and Deepoon E3-C with fast-switch LCD 2.5K sensor

Device characteristics

Purpose: VR helmet for PC
Screen Type: Samsung AMOLED (for Deepoon E3-B) or Fast-switch LCD (for Deepoon E3-C)
Screen resolution: 2560x1440
Screen frequency: 70 Hz
Gaming platform support: SteamVR, Oculus Rift, VR Online
Own video player: Yes (2D, 3D, 360, 3D 360)
Positioning and controllers support: only in the full version, not available for ordering to Russia. In the base models E3-B and E3-C, retrofitting controllers is not possible.
Diameter of lenses: 43 mm
Lens Type: Fresnel Lens
Distance between lenses: 65 mm
Equivalent focusing distance: 0.8 m (suitable for light myopia)
Adaptation for using points: Yes
Brightness adjustment: Yes
IPD adjustment: No
Minimum requirements for games: GTX970 graphics card
Minimum requirements for video: GT730 video card

Customization

- Download Deepoon Assistant from:
http://deepoon.com/dapengzhushou.htmland install the program
- connect the helmet
- run Deepoon Assistant as administrator
- the helmet must decide
- run Steam and SteamVR, the helmet should see SteamVR and suggest setting up the room
- Set up a SteamVR room
- in the Deepoon Assistant to update the firmware of the helmet (the Zip file comes with Deepoon Assistant). This will remove drift.

Comparing images through lenses (zoom 8x): Deepoon E3 + Pimax 4k + HTC Vive + Oculus CV1
https://youtu.be/0JqEXBkwZK8

ATTENTION! In the Deepoon E3-B and E3-C models are incompatible with the base stations and controllers of the full version of the Deepoon E3.

Post has been editedfuel - 03.01.18, 23:05

[Century1402]

Well, I've been waiting for someone to do it for a long time: rolleyes:

fuel @ 06/21/17, 01:34

the helmet is already in testing.

What are the first impressions? I want the details already, at least a little: yes2:

By the way, as I understand it, he does not have headphones in the kit. And is it possible to put on a full large headphones with a helmet, does the design allow?

Post has been editedCentury1402 - 21.06.17, 00:02

[tusen]

What are your first impressions?

[fuel]

Century1402 @ 06.21.17, 01:54

What are the first impressions? I want details already, at least a little

By the way, as I understand it, he does not have headphones in the kit. And is it possible to put on a full large headphones with a helmet, does the design allow?

In short, this is a good clone of the Oculus CV1. The Samsung Amoled matrix, the pentile is visible, it is rather small. Fresnel lenses are the usual as in the HTC Vive, the effects of glare in the form of concentric circles, does not interfere.
Contrast and colors are excellent. The viewing angle is small, at CV1.
Pixelate is a bit better than the Oculus CV1, and much better than the HTC Vive. It was the helmet that left a favorable impression - colors, contrast, absolutely direct IPD (by the way, there are no IPD settings in the program).

There is a claim to ergonomics for my big head, presses the back of my head. The design has no rear tensioner adjustment.
In addition, the native gasket with the slits for the glasses transmits the light, which glares, so I immediately took it off and replaced it with the Kozhzamovskaya one for the viva (the angle had grown a bit).

70Hz is not felt at all in comparison with 90 Hz for CV1, everything is fine and smooth, real Oculus tracking is instantaneous.
The cable counted 4.7 meters, it is more than 3.8 meters in the oculus cv1, i.e. the helmet is ready for a larger rumscale zone.

In general, the first impression so far is a good competitor for HTC Vive if everything is fine with tracking and controllers. Compared with wive, it is much better with pixelation, considering that the controllers will also be with normal sticks instead of stupid touch panels.

With native firmware there was a nuance with drift, I upgraded to Deepoon Assistant and I don’t notice like a drift.

[Century1402]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 02:43

The viewing angle is small, at CV1

Yes, that is what interested in the first place. It is a pity that it is not wider, of course, but if at the level of CV1, it means that it goes wider than the pimaks, in any case.
Again, the CV1 seems to be a physical adjustment of IPD, that is, the screens themselves are moved apart, due to which, I think you can get a larger angle.

fuel @ 06/21/17, 02:43

so I immediately took it off and replaced it with kozhzamovskaya for viva (the angle grew a bit at the same time).

And when approaching the eyes to the lenses, does the same problem occur as with Pimaks - the appearance of edges [curtains] on the sides?

In general, if the choice will stand between CV1 and E3, the advantage is still beyond E3 due to the smaller SDE, as I understand it. This is if you compare bare helmets.

It will be interesting in the future to check out the positioning and E3 controllers. It seems that as with CV1, no one can compete on controllers yet, they are his best,
judging by the reviews.

Posted 06/21/2017 01:01 AM:

fuel @ 06/21/17, 02:43

absolutely direct IPD (by the way, there are no IPD settings in the program).

I wonder what kind of IPD is there by default. I read somewhere long ago that at the level of 63 mm, if I am not mistaken. Bad that there is no setting. Although she and I did not work for some reason.

Post has been editedCentury1402 - 21.06.17, 01:01

[fuel]

Century1402 @ 06.21.17, 02:57

And when approaching the eyes to the lenses, does the same problem occur as with Pimaks - the appearance of edges [curtains] on the sides?

No, the edges are not visible even without the lining, it pleased, in the oculus CV1 with the replacement of the lining worse than all - there the entire cord is only torn off, and not like the others with velcro.

Posted 06/21/2017 01:13:

Century1402 @ 06.21.17, 02:57

In general, if the choice will stand between CV1 and E3, the advantage is still beyond E3 due to the smaller SDE, as I understand it. This is if you compare bare helmets.

I didn’t see a strong advantage, I liked E3 more with contrast in vive. In CV1, the contrast is lower and the rays of God are quite strong. E3 in the picture closer to the vive (brighter juicier). E3 also has nuances with lenses, aberration is much more noticeable at the edges of the lenses (color decomposition). In addition, there is little non-uniformity of sharpness, but in general I liked the lenses, they almost do not wash around the edges (this parameter looks more like in CV1, but better than in a wive).

Post has been editedfuel - 21.06.17, 01:18

[Century1402]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 03:09

No, the edges are not visible even without lining

Well, this is already good, almost the determining factor for me: yes2:
While I see the only negative - not very ergonomic, and some nuances on the lenses [but minor]
Of the benefits: higher resolution than CV1 and the lack of edges with a minimum focal length.

At least it is already better to take it than a pimaks, because They are not far from the prices of each other.
It would be nice to add E3video, for completeness, well, or replace DK 2 with E3 at least: rolleyes:
Here it is already interesting how in comparison with a pimaks it will look like on SDE.

Post has been editedCentury1402 - 21.06.17, 01:27

[tusen]

Now we are waiting for a comparative video of all previous helmets.

[webmaster.1804]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 00:43

In addition, the native gasket with the slits for the glasses transmits the light, which glares, so I immediately took it off and replaced it with the Kozhzamovskaya one for the viva (the angle had grown a bit).

Hello, please tell me where did you get the gasket? link if you can))

[DTD-TOSH]

fuel,
how does it keep up with sharp turns in dynamic movement in "roomscale" games?

[fuel]

webmaster.1804 @ 06.21.2017, 04:09

...
Hello, please tell me where did you get the gasket? link if you can))

Where he took there already is not there in another place but more expensive
https: //m.ru.aliexpres…/item/32809128929.html

Post has been editedfuel - 21.06.17, 06:51

[fuel]

DTD-TOSH @ 06/21/2017 05:49

fuel,
how does it keep up with sharp turns in dynamic movement in "roomscale" games?

In principle, you can normally fix, but the problem with the occipital latch. If you can change the angle of inclination of the helmet in the oculus, then there are no adjustments at all. Just spring-loaded runners.
Also in the forehead area, the radius of the helmet is such that it is pressed at one point of the forehead because of this, festivities are possible. In the oculus, the radius under narrow faces is therefore not forehead centered in the center.
To make the mount clearer, you have to raise the rear fastener closer to the crown so that there is also a clamp in the lower part of the face. Cut for the nose like the norm and does not press.

Unlike wive, the lenses are not so critical to the displacement of the axis of the eyes from the center, there it freezes out the first time until it is clearly configured ipd lenses.

Post has been editedfuel - 21.06.17, 06:56

[Century1402]

I wonder what is the size of the lenses? : scratch_one-s_head:
By the way, about IPD: IPD adjustment is indicated in the characteristics everywhere, apparently it will be programmed when programmed in software like a pimaks.

But I do not see the size of the lenses anywhere.

[fuel]

Century1402 @ 06/21/2017, 14:23

I wonder what is the size of the lenses? : scratch_one-s_head:

43 mm, at the oculus cv1 47 mm, pimaks 45 mm

[Century1402]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 15:21

43 mm

Almost like bobo z4, even a millimeter more :)
In short, the difference is small between all of them, +/- 3-4mm will not play a big role.

[tusen]

fuel @ 06.21.17, 13:21

43 mm

Probably this edge is not visible.

[Century1402]

Tusen @ 06/21/17, 16:53

Probably this edge is not visible.

Probably also because the screen is 5.7 ", and not 5.5".

[tusen]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 06:13

Where he took there already is not there in another place but more expensive

But there and the delivery is much cheaper.

[tusen]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 00:43

Samsung Amoled matrix, pentail is visible, it is quite small

I want to ask about when will the comparison video?
And then on the Pimaks forum, the people are waiting and in the process of waiting for one pepper (liar) with giblets they managed to devour 8)

Post has been editedtusen - 21.06.17, 22:04

[fuel]

Added SDE video comparison:
Deepoon E3 vs Pimax 4k vs HTC Vive vs Oculus CV1
https://youtu.be/0JqEXBkwZK8

[webmaster.1804]

fuel @ 06/21/17, 23:01

Added SDE video comparison:
Deepoon E3 vs Pimax 4k vs HTC Vive vs Oculus CV1
https://youtu.be/0JqEXBkwZK8

Super, I was waiting for this))