What is the best Windows in your opinion? | statistics collection and selection assistance
New survey, Windows 10 almost nine months with us
survey start March 25, 2016
Windows 10 [ 666 ] ** [39,04%]
Windows 8-8.1 [ 133 ] ** [7,8%]
Windows 7-Vista [ 749 ] ** [43,9%]
Windows XP and earlier [ 128 ] ** [7,5%]
I do not use Windows [ 30 ] ** [1,76%]
Total votes: 1706
 



Rep: (96)
We vote for the best version of Windows - we share our impressions and experience
Windows 10 | Windows 8.1 and 8 | Windows 7 | Windows vista | Windows xp | Windows server | Install Windows


Attached Image


When answering the topic, be sure to argue your opinion! ;) Otherwise, the message can be regarded as offtopic and deleted!

Survey results
Attached Image
Attached Image


Post has been editedAndrewP_1 - 30.08.18, 11:52



Rep: (410)
* titimo11,
titimo11 @ 15.06.17, 11:54*
does it make sense to put more than 7 something?

Not.
It makes sense to put XP only.
If you do not need MS Office, I would generally recommend to put Lubuntu. I'm on her old laptop with a Celeron 4 and 512 RAM less work. True browser I use Chromium there - an exact copy of chromium with all Google services



Rep: (410)
Andrew Bedov @ 06/15/17, 12:29*
A little quite on the contrary: it is made of Chrome-based Chromium. As well as several other browsers, including Yandex Browser, Opera, noChromo, etc.

Yes, but not a big deal for the average user. About Chrome know everything, and there is about Chromium.
Andrew Bedov @ 06/15/17, 12:29*
he had the laptop is not older than five to seven years.

He outlined percent T9300 - 478 socket ... not older than 7 years? :)
It's in my media PC (signature) for 7-10 year old Intel core 2 Duo E8600 - here it works fine all

Post has been editedpaxan281281 - 15.06.17, 11:40



Rep: (410)
Andrew Bedov @ 06/15/17, 12:54*
Well then, he supposed, and 4 GB of nowhere, with a configuration of iron.

In general, there is nothing.
Andrew Bedov @ 06/15/17, 12:54*
I'm standing on Seven Athlon-64 3000+ (Socket-754), 2 Gb RAM. It seems nothing is working. Once the processor much more likely to ship 100% than XP.

Of course you can try. And it may at first even less zafurychit, but with the growth of programs and cache deflate.
Andrew Bedov @ 06/15/17, 12:54*
I had to go with XP, because the Chrome refused to use hardware acceleration with 50 versions and my plate she could not see through the USB-cable, and could not even take him online.

Yes, with firewood in XP hard, and support is gone, but technically still works & Office there.



Rep: (405)
Put 7 32-bit, put ramdis primo, it Activate invisible memory, and invisible from the memory system will make ramdisk. Put your browser palemoon, and mount it in the location of the cache on the ramdisk. Just disconnect palemune in html5. Put adobflesh for Mozilla. All will play, and YouTube as well. All of this works fine on a stump with a single-core 4 gipertreyding with 1 gig operatives. (Without ramdisk only).



Rep: (1)
Thank you all for the answers!
I forgot important - 7 and XP the driver is, and no higher.
In fact the increase is felt now poyuzat laptop. Just probably had high expectations)
Now 10 Tabs Mozilla (with the addition of a heavy and a couple of lighter) and all work well. Too weird - even cooler processor silent, as if there is no load)



Rep: (79)
Decided to stay in the seven, though. There is a little performance gain, dx12 is not needed (for me personally). And if you look at the appearance and convenience, then three (!) Control panels are a bit too much)) and the new launch, in my opinion, is a crash. Different icons hurt the eyes. The calendar, yes, is beautiful, but to the point) again A.R.S spoke about supporting the newsoftwareiron is only 10th, but what about the old? Yuzayu fl8, on another forum wrote that it does not start. I do not want anything else: unsure:

Post has been editedFoxFox4444 - 16.06.17, 12:58
Reason for editing: was wrong



Rep: (41)
_YC_ @ 06/10/2017, 15:44*
I do not argue, the way it is, it's just that Linux and Windows have a different target group. Windows - for "just users", Linux - for those who, figuratively speaking, are ready to "finish the file"

If everything was so simple.
Generally, topic 7 is Sun 10, but the red-eyed cannot pass by and climb with their linups.
By topic: 10 faster and works better on the same gland as compared to 7. This is enough to switch to it and leave 7 in the past.



Rep: (1763)
* titimo11,
it's about what you wrote above?
PS: as a general operating system which is the windsurfing less demanding of 7, 8, 10?
I tench standing next to it just flies by srovneniyu with Vida. both (Lin \ wines) 64 bit.



Rep: (1)
shuchvadim @ 16.06.17, 16:53*
it's about what you wrote above?
PS: as a general operating system which is the windsurfing less demanding of 7, 8, 10?
I tench standing next to it just flies by srovneniyu with Vida. both (Lin \ wines) 64 bit.

about what he wrote and even higher - about installed on laptop Windows7 64)
the rest I did not put, people said it makes no sense ...


FOUND culprit of my resentment!))) In general, when the load tyazhelenky sitehttps://www.sports.ru/tribuna/the cooling roars like a plane and page hangs, but after loading the content settling down.

Attached images
Attached Image



Rep: (2)
I tried to put both 7 and 10, I stopped at 7. Although it works slower than 10 and more difficult, but 7 in my opinion is more convenient and more beautiful and seems to be more practical (for I remember not all 10 programs and firewood plowed)



Rep: (313)
Both versions, Van Lav: heart:
P.s Worth and 7-ka and 10-ka



Rep: (33)
7 Kaef, 8, 8.1 buggy and unstable. 10 tolerated
Linux is even better

Post has been editedreliable1 - 22.06.17, 09:03



Rep: (41)
reliable1 @ 06/22/2017, 08:02*
Linux
reliable1 @ 06/22/2017, 08:02*
buggy and unstable



Rep: (5)
for the feeble computers Seven



Rep: (1763)
* chervachok, and say that 8 and 10 are less demanding. 8 the more that was originally designed for plates



Rep: (7)
Generally, topic 7 is Sun 10, but the red-eyed cannot pass by and climb with their linups.
By topic: 10 faster and works better on the same gland as compared to 7. This is enough to switch to it and leave 7 in the past.
Unfortunately, or fortunately, did not work on 7k.
Windows 8.1 compared to the 10th works on the eye the same.

I would prefer this:
- radical cleaning 10ki from all the layers of previous versions,
- uniform design of all windows of system programs.
- more programs in the Windows Store, today there is no and 30% of what I have on the Android-smart.

Without fail I support Windows 10s and in general movement in this direction.



Rep: (247)
* Goplex , your life
Goplex @ 06/22/17, 9:40 *
buggy and unstable
: D
Do not use, do not say.


Personally, I'm for the seven, I do not like the interface 10-ki: D

Post has been editedsteftim - 27.06.17, 23:12



Rep: (41)
Do not use, do not say.
Well, yes, after all linups can put only favorites.
I do not like the interface 10-ki: D
This is, of course, the most important thing in the OS.



Rep: (79)
Goplex @ 06/28/17, 11:28*
This is, of course, the most important thing in the OS.

The system should be a pleasure to work with. And 10ka is some kind of Frankenstein: D



Rep: (41)
FoxFox4444 @ 06.28.2017, 11:33*
And 10ka is some kind of Frankenstein: D
same eggs, only in profile.
Metro is practically not involved.


Full version    

Help     rules

Time is now: 19/08/20, 00:49