Generally. I rode about 40 minutes in the city (good small: D), I didn’t see one radar for 50-100 meters, but I didn’t see the radar butt by 1-2 stripes: lol:. GPS is working properly, firmware V1.1.43, this is PPC of course. Before flashing (factory, alas, I do not know which one) everything was a bundle. I will roll back, I hope without a problem: - /

Question to the representative, or who knows the answer. There are two files in the folder with the firmware, one is the ".bin Video Production", the other is the "Detection Firmware .rd0". If 43, flashing radar firmware with 41? Is it possible or will there be a brick?

Post has been editedhitruk77 - 09.03.19, 17:55

NEOLINE X-COP 9000 (Post Neoline Rus # 78273174)
factory laid out here
factory 41

X-COP9000c_BB (RevM38) .rar(9.55 MB)

38 beta like

Post has been editedUzer - 09.03.19, 19:06

Uzer ,
Oh. Such confusion with these firmware. As far as I understand
38 factory
41 beta
43 jamb)

Neoline Rus Can you give an exact explanation on the 9000c firmware? And if you can post them in one post.

I will insert my 3 pennies. Regarding the rollbacks of firmware back. 9000 as I wrote above after the rollback began to work as expected. But 9000s does not respond to more than one radar. I drove along the Ufa Chelyabinsk. Radar is full. Reactions zero. Except that in the database. Hike radar, I understood so dead. Even not at all happy.

Hello.
Now we are actively testing firmware for devices, so it is not always possible to respond quickly here.
I will answer the accumulated questions.
For firmware 9000c:
1) From the factory put 41 firmware. This is the usual complex firmware.
2) There are 43 firmware, the filter of Z-signatures appears in it and the possibility of choosing the priority of the alert - GPS priority and priority of the radar part (the function "GPS Priority" - ON or OFF).
The behavior of the function is - if the priority is turned off, then: if there is a signal from the radar part, then regardless of the speed of your movement there will be an alert about it. If there is no signal from the radar part or the priority is on, then after the voice announcement of the GPS point, there will be silence until you reach the "Allowed (by base) + allowable exceed (from settings)" speed. In 41 firmware the priority of GPS alerts was, and it was impossible to choose the priority of the radar part.
3) If for some reason someone does not like either the factory firmware (complex) or signature (perhaps there are any problems with them), it is possible to install the 38th firmware version.
From myself I’ll add - currently there is another firmware under development, several small things will be added there, such as fast mode switching, quick on / off Z-filter, viewing the base version and a couple more cosmetic corrections, this firmware is not there yet, we are waiting.
Also - to whom the behavior of devices seems strange and illogical, write to [email protected] with a detailed description, colleagues will respond more quickly than I am here.
Also, my proposal regarding your signature firmware is still valid. Our tests show an increase in range in the same conditions on the same radars on signature firmware, so from you for our analysis:
1) Video on 41 firmware
2) Video on the same radar on 43 firmware (with filter on)
3) Video on the same radar on 43 firmware (with the filter disabled).
The Z-filter is a buffer in which the signal is placed for preliminary analysis, and for 9000 / 9000c / 9100 devices this may take some time, and therefore the range may drop slightly (the detection will be the same, but the signal will appear on the screen and sound a little bit later than when the filter is off. In Turbo mode, the Z-filter is inactive.
Many vendors have released separate signature devices (signature versions of non-signature devices initially), we took the path of giving the user a choice, adding this option to already existing devices without forcing to buy another device.
So ... what else ... there was a question on the radar part - the devices came out a few years ago, and since then the radar complexes have become quieter, and some manufacturers have taken the path of choosing vertical polarization or have generally followed the path of developing radarless photo-fixation complexes, therefore, we try to be in trend (which is set by SI manufacturers), by upgrading the hardware platform for new devices and modifying what is already programmed. Within our lines, 9000 / 9000s / 9100 have an average level of sensitivity (if you look at today), their sensitivity is about the same with devices 9500 / 9500s / 9700 / 9700s / 7000/7500. There are more budget solutions with a lower level of sensitivity, there are devices with EXD (a higher level of sensitivity).
At the request of the firmware to lay out - no problem.
This is exactly for the version9000c !
1) RevM38X-COP9000c_BB (RevM38) .rar(9.55 MB)

2) RevM41 and RevM43 in one archive9000c.7z(23.72 MB)

Pps. For operational advice, write to the LAN, now a high load, so there is not always a chance to answer here.

And for 9000 you can lay out? The most stable which now

In general, for 9000 lies on the office in the "Updates" section.
1) RevM35 - non-signature (complex).X-COP9000_BB (RevM35) _RD (RevM04) .zip(10.71 MB)

2) RevM41 - signature.Signature firmware.zip(29.81 MB)

Ps. Thanks for the great feedback on Yandex.Market. We will answer later.

x-cop 9000
Neoline9000.zip(99.31 MB)

all that dug) firmware from version 24 to 41
mnu has 24, 26, 27 bricks, the machine’s revision is not the same, the rest work (it did not help me)
I solved my problems (too far warning of RPS and bad radar part) differently)

Post has been editedUzer - 10.03.19, 18:17

I put today revm35 revm04 which, it seems a little better, but still not. Too close to the radar he makes the sound. At the turbo a lot of noise on the road too close to the radar gives the sound. How stable to work to set up something

P.S. For feedback - please! I will wait for an answer: rolleyes:;)

Generally. Made a test test of 3 firmware laid out above, for 9000c. While stopped at 41 factory firmware. More travel possible. For me, the most normal, but in turbo mode. XCOP mode on all firmware (for me) lives, alas, not understandable life. With the increase in the firmware, in my opinion, there is a "thoughtfulness" of the radar and GPS (auto speed) parts of the device. 38 and 41 cold start GPS up to 10 seconds. Naughty instantly. at 43 a little thoughtfully clings to the satellites.
The video is excellent everywhere (for me, after Sho-Me Combo 1). But here's the radar part ... of course somewhere less, somewhere it catches more interference (XCOP), but again with the Turbo mode, there is more confidence that it will not miss the cameras, but it beeps like Sho-Me. It has been 3 days since the purchase, there is still time, but the thought of return does not leave me, and dreary, in proving that the hybrid does not work (does not suit me).
Believe it or not, but Sho-Me reacted to approach cameras that shoot in the back. I understand that the structure of horn radar detectors contradicts this, but still.

Do not try to prove that does not work. On the contrary, say that everything works fine, but for example there is not enough convenient mounting on the panel, etc.
Do not complain about the operation of the device !!! Will be sent for warranty repair, well, all the consequences

Uzer, But how can I explain that there is no power cable?) I have a hidden wiring, and the output at 12 volts is right next to the rear-view mirror. I did not think that everything would be so sad, and immediately set everything up as normal = (

And what's interesting there.?

There are no problems with the device

Uzer ,
No there is simply no one, everything is here.

Good day. And tell me, please, does he see a memory card with a volume of more than 32 GB? Judging by the year of development of the model, I must see, but there is no confidence in this and it will be difficult to check in the store - the power supply is from 12 volts, not 5.

serulya,

Drozd-Cannibal , I already read the manual. However, almost all devices that see cards with a capacity of 32 GB are able to see SDXC cards, i.e. 128 GB in my case. Therefore, we need feedback from real owners.

serulya, then focus on the answer picachu007 from the thematic forum.
True, I still haven’t found a “search by topic”, so finding real reviews on one hundred and seventy pages will be difficult.

I would, but there are no maps of more than 32 GB.

Post has been editedDrozd-Cannibal - 13.03.19, 14:23