[X]Assistant

[werwolf696]

Google is developing a new operating system.

According to the information from the official page on GitHub, Google is developing a completely new operating system for all devices. As the project description says, “Pink + Purple = Fuchsia” (a new operating system).

What is it?End of Android? If the system is unified and compatible (like the same Windows PC), then perhaps Andrew is really kirdyk. What do you think? Does Fuchsia eat a robot or choke?

Yes, Google’s new OS is codenamed Fuchsia (Fuchsia), a perennial plant with pink-purple buds. The new system is developed on the basis of the new Magenta core, which, in turn, is a modified version of LittleKernel. The kernel is mainly designed to work on embedded electronics, such as Raspberry Pi boards or gadgets from the Internet of Things category. Already, the Fuchsia operating system supports processors with architectures 32 and 64 bit ARM, as well as x86-64. A new operating system from Google, you can try to run in a virtual machine, and soon there will be an assembly for Raspberry Pi 3.

Fuchsia is created as an operating system that can work on all devices - from smartphones and tablets to embedded electronics and the Internet of things. For the GUI, Fuchsia uses the Flutter language, and the main programming language is Dart. The system already supports some graphical effects using the OpenGL and Vulkan API. The main interface is made in the "material" style.

Post has been editedwerwolf696 - 14.08.16, 13:37

[werwolf696]

More here
https://trashbox.ru/to...-operacionnuyu-sistemu

If they really make a system that does not have such differences as an android on different devices, it is very likely to be in demand. And then Andrew is already someone who just does not cut in his own way.

Post has been editedwerwolf696 - 14.08.16, 13:39

[rori]

If this is not a fake, then Google probably felt that it was impossible to cook porridge with android, considering its reputation as a funky toy for half-figures, and not waiting for a total drain on competitors, decided to build something more human-oriented and stable: D

[werwolf696]

[email protected], 18:56

If this is not a fake, then Google probably felt that the porridge could not be cooked with the android, given its reputation as a funky toy for the half-boys.

Polugiki .. Keek .. Tasty wrote :) ..

Posted on 08/14/2016, 2:02 PM:

[email protected], 18:56

If this is not a fake

On pda, too, infa about it lies. Maybe a fake but (IMHO) on the other hand, the Googlers are not fools and they understand that the android is not a cake. And not even a cupcake :)
http: //savagemessiahzine.com/ tag / google-fuchsia /

[lexusv]

Soon, bare smartphones will be sold, and the system will be purchased separately.

[werwolf696]

[email protected], 21:03

Soon, bare smartphones will be sold, and the system will be purchased separately.

I am for. But at the present time it is unrealistic.

[mkudritsky]

I have always not understood this - Vendors are producing and actually producing new lightweight Linux distributions.
And they give it as much for developing their own operating system !! :)

To develop your OS, you have to plow for 25 years!
Well, as Microsoft and Apple did. And even then they did not start from a complete zero, but were repelled from Unix systems.
Yes, and in the development of mobile systems, they have rich experience (from MS Win Mobile 1.0 and Newton Pad and above).
And Linux already has a 22-year history of development and is repelled by Unix.

And then the campaign, which never wrote its own operating system, suddenly decided to pursue supposedly its full development! :)

I think they will not sculpt another Linux distribution, but continue the Android line.

[werwolf696]

Mkudritsky @ 08/15/2016, 00:55

Vendors produce and actually produce lightweight Linux distributions.

Well so if I am not mistaken for Linux no one needs to pay. And its create-laziness and expensive.

[mkudritsky]

[email protected], 19:57

Well so if I am not mistaken for Linux no one needs to pay. And its create-laziness and expensive.

Well, I'm talking about!
Of course, they took free Linux, invested once, modified Linux to a standard tablet and smartphone, called it Android and enjoy life - then develop it, refine it, keep up with the new Linux kernels.

And they are still going to develop some kind of fuchsia! Surely take care of the incompatibility with Android. There will be effort to spray!
Although a no-brainer is clear, this will be another Linux distribution.

[lexusv]

Yes, they do not catch up with Windows, all the forces throw and screwed up.
They realized late, in principle, next year there will be two platforms, Windows and iOS.

[werwolf696]

[email protected], 01:19

Yes, they do not catch up with Windows,

Catch up? Do not tell the audience :) .. The percentage of smart under Windows is void. This Windows is now catching up with Android and iOS. And there is a suspicion that Mikey generally abandon venture with vinfony. : rofl:

Post has been editedwerwolf696 - 14.08.16, 20:24

[lexusv]

Hardly throw, so much money spent, at least leave afloat, as a maximum,
It will be as with desktop PCs, to prevail over all.

Posted 08/14/2016 20:38:

What androyd catch up? Google put a cross on it.
Now manufacturers will understand what is what, a year or two about androyd already do not remember

[werwolf696]

[email protected], 01:36

What androyd catch up? Google put a cross on it.

While it is not known exactly, but the facts as BE hint.

[email protected], 01:36

Hardly throw, so much money spent, at least leave afloat, as a maximum,

Well nokiyu they were thrown without any problems. Vryatli will leave the market painfully tidbit. Let's see what kind of surfon will be.

Microsoft loses profits from the sale of smartphones
For the fourth fiscal quarter of last year, which ended in June, Microsoft's revenues from the mobile unit fell by 70% compared with the same period a year earlier.

Post has been editedwerwolf696 - 14.08.16, 22:32

[werwolf696]

[email protected], 01:36

Now manufacturers will understand what is what, a year or two about androyd already do not remember

The robot has a good base-fat market, millen devices. Yes, and to make an android without google IMHO is not a great problem, and so already who are fond of what is in that much. But if this Google "ficus" really will be better then yes. Slam the robot.

[mkudritsky]

[email protected], 22:34

The robot has a good base-fat market, millen devices. Yes, and to make an android without google IMHO is not a great problem, and so already who are fond of what is in that much.

I think so too.
If Google abandons Android, then continue, for example, to some kind of consortium like Samsung + LG. Or open source.
There is here, however, subtlety - this is if Google sells Android to them at a reasonable price for the consortium.

[email protected], 22:34

But if this Google "ficus" really will be better then yes. Slam the robot.

The problem here is the same as Linux.
Yes, Linux is absolutely better than Windows desktop. Butuntiloccupies 1% of the market only because there are no applications for it. But Linux has nowhere to rush - for it, OpenSource, fast commercial success is unimportant, but sooner or later (better early), it will still sweep Take out.

So Fuchsia will be a success if at least the basic Android applications are launched under it.
Otherwise, it will be a great OS, but without software - i.e. no one wants. And the people will remain seated on Android.
(It’s like Win XP on desktops. Windows 10 is better than Win XP. But 20% of users in the software world have established systems on XP, they don’t play games - so they are bastards, on Win XP, despite all Microsoft attempts Transplant them on Win 10!).

Post has been editedmkudritsky - 15.08.16, 05:59

[rori]

[email protected], 06:59

Yes, Linux is absolutely better than Windows desktop

What is better? Lack of software, or champion fragmentation? Or something else? : D

[mkudritsky]

rori @ 08/15/2016 06:21

What is better? Lack of software, or champion fragmentation? Or something else?

Linux is better because it was created without haste, without rushing, thinking through the details.
The core of it turned out, as the Baalbek Triliton - reliable, bug-free, without fundamental errors. But unlike Triliton is also fast!
The Linux kernel has been created for 20 years. And now it is up to add-ons such as graphical shells, etc.

For Windows developers, current commercial success has always been important.
Therefore, software was thrown onto the market often insufficiently thought out and insufficiently tested. Yes, then the patches arrived (by the way, often the size of the system itself!), But errors accumulated, including fundamental errors.
And how now to Microsoft to correct fundamental errors? To do this, at the very base of the pyramid it is necessary to change the giant granite blocks covered with cracks! And for this you need to disassemble the pyramid itself - long and expensive.

And all this - I repeat - arose from the fact that they threw raw software onto the market, trying to outperform the competitors.
Part of the blunts arising from this, it must be admitted, have been corrected, and some of the blunders turned out to be fundamental (they cannot be fixed with just a patch).
With principled blunders, they did this — they simply cornered the disease and did not treat it. But sooner or later, a non-cured disease will still show itself!

Post has been editedmkudritsky - 15.08.16, 06:41

[rori]

Mkudritsky @ 08/15/2016, 07:36

The Linux kernel has been created for 20 years. And now it is up to add-ons such as graphical shells, etc.

At least 100 years old, it doesn't change the essence: D

[werwolf696]

Mkudritsky @ 08/15/2016, 11:36

And all this - I repeat - arose from the fact that they threw raw software onto the market, trying to outperform the competitors.

And what are the competitors of Windows? Linux? So under it neither games nor normal software. Makos is a makos and there is software and games, but poppies are not cheap, for 6000 p. do not build .. Yes, and games and prog needed under Windows sharply better. Windows does not have a competitor in terms of desktop OS.

Post has been editedwerwolf696 - 15.08.16, 09:30

[werwolf696]

Mkudritsky @ 08/15/2016, 11:36

For Windows developers, current commercial success has always been important.

Well, yes, they are not altruistic. And yes they do normal good OS every other time, but they acknowledge and correct their mistakes. After the dull Mr. Vin Vista released just excellent Win 7.