If you compare the Redmi 4 Pro with the performance of the Galaxy C7, which are built on identical processors, and with FullHD screens, then in AnTuTu Redmi 4 Pro will have to gain the same 60,000 points, despite the fact that it will have 3 GB of RAM, and not 4 GB, like the Galaxy C7.
As for the cameras, much depends on the QUALITY of the optics, and the matrix. One value of aperture ratio (f 2.2) is not an indicator here. Yes, I would like to have 1.7-2.0 high-aperture glass, but then what will manufacturers put in their flagships, than to prove the advantages, than to explain the overpayment for XXX bucks for their top solutions? But as for the quality of the photos, I’ll say that in my budget Xiaomi Redmi 1, as well as Redmi 1s for $ 120 cameras stand with 2.2 aperture from Omnyvision (far from Sony), but their quality is LARGE (as when shooting at night, in motion) than the $ 235 Xiaomi Mi4i with a 5-element camera and f / 2.0 aperture (from Sony / Samsung). How can this be explained that a camera with darker glasses takes better pictures than a camera with lighter glass? Therefore, not everything depends on luminosity. And there is only one step (level) from 2.0 to 2.2 - here the matrix sensitivity and the chances of the cameras will be equal for the step, and if the matrix itself is not slag, then the noise at such a step will not be noticeable.
I took it here, and just compared the TTX displays on the Xiaomi Mi4c and Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro. There is a difference, in the same color gamut coverage. In Mi4c, it is
95% NTSC , and Redmi 4 Pro has only
72% NTSC which does not add to her a plus, given the fact that their prices are almost identical, but rather, Mi4c is sold cheaper, and gains the same 55,000 points in AnTuTu. Therefore, those who already have Mi4c, I would not advise them to change their smartphone to Redmi 4 Pro.
Post has been editedlawyerhome - 05.11.16, 16:10