DVR Dome D201 | Ambarella A12A55 + 5Mp sensor OV4689 + 2560x1440 / 30 HDR + GPS
20151210a_A12a55_G_DAB201_ZhongXing_v2135.rarAll with the come year !!! If anyone saw the photo / video guts of the device post a link. Or if someone conceives disassemble zafotkayte insides!
I took off a little todayDen.Solntse.
And yet, yes! finally got his hands once again check out our viewing angle ..
Information for consideration:
1st frame Dome D201 with the stated angle of 170 degrees (more than 4Mp he can not 16: 9, in other modes, it removes the 4: 3 and even smaller angle)
2nd Xiaomi YI frame angle 155 (this image, and in video mode the top and bottom cuts, making of 4: 3 - 16: 9, the angle / scale does not change)
Someone is clearly deceiving us))
Post has been editedch3zzz - 02.01.16, 19:22
And yet, yes! finally got his hands once again check out our viewing angle ..
Information for consideration:
1st frame Dome D201 with the stated angle of 170 degrees (more than 4Mp he can not 16: 9, in other modes, it removes the 4: 3 and even smaller angle)
2nd Xiaomi YI frame angle 155 (this image, and in video mode the top and bottom cuts, making of 4: 3 - 16: 9, the angle / scale does not change)
 |
 |
Someone is clearly deceiving us))
Post has been editedch3zzz - 02.01.16, 19:22
Angle of view I think that something does not quite live up to the stated 170 degrees, and more than 120 looks like
Someone is clearly deceiving us))
Good evening!
Basically all the information about the angle given by diogonali, and which corresponds to 170gradusov.
On the horizon at this BP how to properly noticed about 120 degrees *.
Dome D201 with the stated angle of 170 degrees (more than 4Mp he can not 16: 9, in other modes, it removes the 4: 3 and even smaller angle)
Same.
Post has been editedgse1 - 03.01.16, 20:45
gse1 @ 03.01.2016, 20:38
Basically all the information about the angle given by diogonali, and which corresponds to 170gradusov.
Well, I do not know ... I've never heard about the vertical! It is more logical somehow horizontal yet ...
gse1 @ 03.01.2016, 20:38
Same.
Expressed doubts))
 |
 |
Post has been editedch3zzz - 03.01.16, 20:59
gse1 @ 03.01.2016, 21:03
Not worth it.
Why am I so different then the visible area taken from one point to different modes?
ch3zzz @ 03.01.2016, 21:12
Why am I so different then the visible area taken from one point to different modes?
I can not know.
gse1, And yes! in the foregoing test, so some pictures show the viewing angle in the video mode (fullHD and QHD), rather than photo
In the video that I myself can confirm that it is the same all the way!
ch3zzz @ 03.01.2016, 21:19
rather than photo
From the perspective of the photographer will not be able to explain it better to them.
Just do not see the point BP to do a photo (it is called DVR), a telephone, at the very least make some screenshots from the video.
Post has been editedgse1 - 03.01.16, 22:32
So I figured, * 155 degrees is also diogonal and meaningful to compare BP with different optics.
And yet we're shooting in video mode, and photo mode if it is in Parliament, it is bun, but have never used in its Q2, although it is 5 years on the guard.
Post has been editedgse1 - 03.01.16, 23:03
And yet we're shooting in video mode, and photo mode if it is in Parliament, it is bun, but have never used in its Q2, although it is 5 years on the guard.
Post has been editedgse1 - 03.01.16, 23:03
gse1, what You'll excuse me of course, but you finally can see the picture?
Even if it is 155 * diagonal *, with your words,
That is why 155 * degrees diagonal * * Xiaomei more than 170 degrees diagonal * BP?
Even if it is 155 * diagonal *, with your words,
It's not from my words and tricks in marketing, otherwise who was carried at an angle of 74 degrees on the horizon * on older models, please check on the table and see everything.
It is strange that you are doing a review and mention the corners did not bother to make the measurements on the table that would have a complete understanding about the angle of the horizon.
That is why 155 * degrees diagonal * * Xiaomei more than 170 degrees diagonal * BP?
It depends on the optics with its focal length and the matrix.
As an example, optics with different focal lengths, the matrix alone, XB is the same, the angle of the horizon 86 * and 74 * in stock (commercially claimed * 120)
Post has been editedgse1 - 04.01.16, 11:08
gse1 @ 04.01.2016, 10:56
It depends on the optics with its focal length and the matrix.
I would like to know. It optics + matrix size (crop) and determines the final angle. On the type of lens and give the stated angle VR review at this particular peephole * *.
gse1 @ 04.01.2016, 10:56
It is strange that you are doing a review and mention the corners did not bother to make the measurements on the table that would have a complete understanding about the angle of the horizon.
Location infa that I did not do? )) Is not a simple I started talking about these 120 degrees, for ...
 |
 |
And here comes the most embarrassing moment, when the 170-degree marketing become smaller as 155 marketing))
Location infa that I did not do? ))
Since then, and we have to start, and that was primordial:
Angle of view I think that something does not quite live up to the stated 170 degrees, and more than 120 looks like.
And here comes the most embarrassing moment
And what is awkward, now all in their places, and where is declared 170 and 155 on the horizon as has been suggested to mean. ;)
Post has been editedgse1 - 04.01.16, 12:24
gse1, The first photo - Dome with 201 c declared 170 degrees
The second - with Xiaomi YI with the declared 155
Nothing confuses?
gse1, I do not understand - it's a subtle trolling?
If you do not see that Xiaomi frame more and climbed vertically and horizontally, as it hints at a larger angle, although claimed less ....
PS ... stop all this talk.
©savagemessiahzine.com2005-2019. All rights reserved.
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement