® XPrivacy | Prevents leakage of personal data
Xposed_fix_4.0_v2.zipPiscander @ 16.04.19, 22:47
Group - privacy; Name - Internet.Offline; Class (or is it all the same "method", I'm not sure) - android.net.NetworkInfo;
Collection - Privacy
Group - Internet.Offline
Name - NetworkInfo.createFromParcel
Class - android.net.NetworkInfo
Method - CREATOR: createFromParcel.
If I understand correctly, then this hook, it makes sense to use together with the restriction of the "Read data network", but this is not accurate.
He works for applications which themselves climb into the network as soon as find a connection. If an application such as the browser to apply force to the network, it will still go to the Internet, although formally hook work. So this hook - more safety net to conserve battery life than a real ban. For a real ban - firewalls (if the hook is just a theme).
yk_grom @ 16.04.2019, 23:37
Method - CREATOR: createFromParcel
It is suspected that the possibility of making connections on the Android much more flexible than just through this challenge.
yk_grom @ 16.04.2019, 23:37
For a real ban - firewalls
Not only...
Question on filling: why XPrivacy ban on access to the internet worked and still work?
Post has been editedokomand - 17.04.19, 15:00
okomand @ 17.04.19, 14:59
why XPrivacy ban on access to the internet worked and still works
This is who he XPrivacy works.
The fact that the hook is discussed in Lua has a different purpose - to hide the presence of an active connection to the network, but by itself does not prevent the exit of applications on the network.
Post has been editedyk_grom - 17.04.19, 17:15
Reason for editing: 1
yk_grom @ 17.04.2019, 14:12
This is who he XPrivacy works.
Well, such is still missing. The main thing - the presence of a fully operational Xposed.
And it does not answer my question)
yk_grom @ 17.04.2019, 14:12
discussed hook in Lua has a different purpose - to hide the presence of an active connection to the network
Even this is debatable: how this hook all hiding something.
okomand @ 17.04.19, 17:52
as the hook at all hiding something
Tested it on all your favorite Google Play - all the while cursing at the lack of connection.
But unfortunately, at the moment I have only empirical observations
Pupiyas @ 04.12.18, 00:28
switching to PREMISSIVE
It is much easier to switch over The selinux switch + without ads
yk_grom @ 17.04.19, 17:37
Tested it on all your favorite Google Play - all the while cursing at the lack of connection.
Here I am saying that I used to have, at least (and this is the exact case) two applications blocked by the Internet. On the other did not check, I thought that there is the same. And now when etkrytii applications marked with this hook, everything goes to the Internet. Perhaps it was written above right about Ineta in the background (when the application is inactive), I do not know. But why it had been the way it was?) In short, and now works as it should, limiting only the background the 'Net, but earlier it was some kind of bug, well, I do not know what to call it. Okay, Boh with him. Just I wanted to ask the other members of this hook as they are things with its use.
Say, subj must request the right su or not?
First, he does not budge, and later did work, but does not ask for rights. It should be?
First, he does not budge, and later did work, but does not ask for rights. It should be?
_THE __ 12.05.19, 17:30
Complaint quote
AICP MM 9 ANDR + MAGISK + XPOSED (module xprivacy activated!) = BOOTLOOP
AICP MM 9 ANDR + MAGISK + XPOSED (module xprivacy activated!) = BOOTLOOP
Search all folders and files named xprivacy via tvrp and delete
_TMA_ @ 12/05/19 at 15:30
9 AICP MM ANDR + MAGISK + XPOSED
and everything worked without Hprivacy? I mean Xposed and other modules?
Minstrel @ 05/09/19, 04:40
I earned, but does not ask for rights. It should be?
Terrionn @ 09.05.19, 04:43
Should not. As XprivacyLua.
Is ???
I do not understand why, but blocking access to the clipboard has stopped working. Before that, I deleted some system applications that were frozen for a long time and then could not access Google Play after clearing the Configupdater and Google Play Services Framework data.
In XPrivacyLua I tried to block the access to the buffer (with clipboard) for all applications (including system). But to no avail, does not operate a ban on access to with clipboard, while blocking (or rather spoofing) other functions work. Even completely reinstalled XPrivacyLua (XprivacyLua Pro did not touch) and even further activated locking the clipboard for all user applications (the system is not touched) in XPrivacy, but still user applications have access to the buffer, the reason may be what?
Post has been editedHeknows - 17.05.19, 12:00
In XPrivacyLua I tried to block the access to the buffer (with clipboard) for all applications (including system). But to no avail, does not operate a ban on access to with clipboard, while blocking (or rather spoofing) other functions work. Even completely reinstalled XPrivacyLua (XprivacyLua Pro did not touch) and even further activated locking the clipboard for all user applications (the system is not touched) in XPrivacy, but still user applications have access to the buffer, the reason may be what?
Post has been editedHeknows - 17.05.19, 12:00
Heknows @ 17.05.2019, 08:59
but stopped working blocking access to the clipboard
Most importantly you have forgotten: how do you check?
Heknows @ 17.05.2019, 08:59
In XPrivacyLua tried to block the access to the buffer (clipboard)
Exactly how?
What happens if you temporarily disable XPrivacyLua, leaving only the XPrivacy lock?
Post has been editedokomand - 17.05.19, 15:07
[email protected], 15:05
How do you check this?
 |
 |
 |
 |
[email protected], 15:05
What happens if you temporarily disable XPrivacyLua, leaving only the XPrivacy lock?
 |
In addition, earlier, if in XPrivacyLua Pro to set up a notification about the fact that access to some information was changed, then in fact there were notifications about the attempt to access the exchange buffer, now there is no notification exchange buffer, there are other hooks
Post has been editedHeknows - 17.05.19, 17:41
Heknows @ 17.05.2019, 14:34
The same, completely turned off XPrivacyLua in Xposed installer and preload, but nothing has changed - the clipboard for "blocked" applications is available
What about this in XPrivacy magazine?
[email protected], 17:41
What about this in XPrivacy magazine?
 |
P.S.
Some miracles are happening: the clipboard lock for the application of our forum has worked as it used to work
 |
 |
But after allowing access to the clipboard, both in Xprivacy and XPrivacyLua for the forum application - this setting has not been applied and blocking continues - links are not copied. (what a strange delay? Even rebooted and does not help)
 |
 |
Post has been editedHeknows - 17.05.19, 19:11
©savagemessiahzine.com2005-2020 All rights reserved.
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement
savagemessiahzine.com®- registered trademark.
Terms of Use | Denial of responsibility | Advertising placement