il1dan @ 06/08/2013, 02:21
Is that to make the battery smaller, but then the battery life will suffer. What is absolutely not worth doing.
In general, this is quite a difficult question. On the one hand, yes, the longer the battery life, the better. On the other hand, does it make sense to make this parameter absolute and make it an end in itself?
Here, after all, what kind of logic: the volume of acb in w510 and in w3 is absolutely the same - 3.5k mA / h. In this case, 510ka is able to work up to 8 hours without recharging and without the use of add. Akb Dock. The w3 has absolutely identical filling, therefore, the energy efficiency is the same. But at the same time, the w3 has a smaller display, therefore, less energy will be spent on its work. As a result, the total battery life of w3 is longer than that of 510k. Another conversation that no one knows exactly how much - 2 hours, 3, 4?
However, if this difference in time is calculated and reduced by the volume of acb in w3, just enough to get the same work time without recharging as in 510k, it will be possible to reduce the weight of the device without significant loss of autonomy (after all, 8 hours 510s is enough for most). The only question is how significant weight loss can be achieved in this way.
Well, okay, this is not all that important. In the end, each preference is different - someone needs maximum autonomy from a tablet, someone has extremely low weight and portability, so it’s pointless to argue about it (:
True, there is one nuance. W3 will inevitably be compared with a mini stub, which is almost 200 grams lighter. And it is this detail that will serve as a reason for every "leading analyst" there to declare that another tablet on Windows is not a cake, for it is heavy.