G + G (glass on glass) I wonder what this means?
I have to ICOO D70W such a matrix was. Trying to find online what these things mean. As I understand it, this means only that the matrix is ​​enclosed in a "sandwich" of two glass plates. Instead of plastic. In theory, this means a little better picture quality, due to the fact that there will be less distortion - Glass transmits light better. On the other hand, the matrix will be more brittle. The matrix is ​​usually ICOO TN - not bad, but the stars from the sky is not enough. I would say 8 "Teclast matrix better, better viewing angles, better contrast, brightness slightly higher.
As for the "IPS" screen, the online-store online stores, as always, were "slightly exaggerated" ... As for the battery with an allegedly 5000mAh. Apparently some technical difficulties.
No technical problems with the release of 8 "IPS does not have screens. If desired, manufacturers can easily produce 8" IPS screens. The only thing the majority of 8 "screens" unconventional "today the aspect ratio of 4: 3 and not 16: 9. Or 16:10 The fact that the liquid crystal matrix is ​​not produced individually, and the" cut "of a large workpiece, conventionally, it is possible . make four matrix 8 "1024 * 768, but you can - one 16" 2048 * 1536 screen with an aspect ratio of 16: 9 and 16:10 from a single blank is greater than 4: 3 screen, so the cost of the last above this,. rather than the mythical "great convenience" is primarily due to the dominance of today's widescreen LCD matrices. in the days CRT monitors, remember, this was not here, is more profitable to do IPS matrix 7 "16: 9 rather than 8" 4:. 3 - the first to be significantly cheaper IPad If not, now would not be such a dominance of matrices 9.7. "1024 * 768 4: 3. Just iPads produced a huge amount, and requirements for the screens Apple has the highest - dead pixels, for example, should not be at all. Apple requires a standard matrix A +. But the percentage of defects still exist - and these matrices are for inexpensive Chinese tablets. If you are lucky, the screen can not really be worse than the IPad. Now that the IPad 2 is gradually disappearing, the number of Chinese tablets 9.7 "1024 * 768 will also reduce (but over time there will be 9.7" 2048 * 1536 - but they are expensive and require a very powerful GPU).
it would be better if the front 2Mp
I agree. Among other things, this camera also needs a special case that would not close it. In general, the back camera in the tablet is not needed. But better frontal - welcome. Here I am impressed by the Ainol approach, but only in top tablets, Elf and above - one front camera of 2 MP. Compare front-facing cameras ICOO D70W (1.3 MP) and Teclast P85 (0.3 MP, VGA). The first clearly won.
NicolasG, I wrote in a hat that its price in China was $ 143, for 2 days on taobao the number of sellers increased 10-fold times (from -1 to 10), one already sold 4 pieces, several more by 1st ...
Strange that Ali is still calm - not a single proposal, even pre-sell. At Pande only recently appeared original Ramos W13 - not too tasty for the price of 160 dollars. For comparison, the 16 GB 1 GB RAM Teclast P85 with the same screen (as a minimum) cost me Ali delivery Singapore post a little less than 150 dollars. And then 8 GB 512 MB RAM. However, a processor Cortex A9, the same Mali-400 (it is possible that running at a lower frequency), there are touch-sensitive buttons (not the fact that they need to Teclast key individuals), two speakers located sloppy (at Teclast, like it turned out, the speaker also 2, they are located more clumsy) has an IR port (I think) and a separate connector for charging (this is useful in Teclast I miss him). But in the Teclast aluminum body that is very positive effect on the thermal regime. In general, the price is clearly inadequate. Again, especially in the light fantastically low real prices for Ramos W17Pro, actual delivery of $ 120, and even slightly lower, proving itself in SoC device is inexpensive.
Ramos W13Pro, of course, is much better than Ramos W17Pro:
Screen 8 "1024 * 768 vs. 7" 1024 * 600
The battery is 4000 mAh vs. 3200 mAh (but, it seems, not promised 5000 mAh, unfortunately. 4000 mAh is also stated in Teclast, really - 3900 mAh, judging by the photo disassembly, it is possible that there will be the same thing).
2 cameras against one, but the front is the same - dubious
There is an infrared port - this is to control the device as a multimedia player. In principle, it is useful if the console will be bundled, otherwise, again - a dubious advantage
There is HDMI - this is a clear plus, but the cable in the kit will still be forgotten.
A more pleasant design (subjectively), there are touch buttons (so-so advantage, I had the ICOO - they only interfered, the hardware buttons on Teclast - it's more convenient for me, and I won't accidentally click)
It seems I have not forgotten anything. It seems to me that these advantages do not pull on the price difference of a good $ 50.
Slowly starting to dream about
MOMO8 Speedalthough I like the W13Pro. But at a price of up to 170 dollars with delivery, no more.
Post has been editedNicolasG - 25.05.12, 09:15