With all due respect to
nik-0 I can not agree with him (the machine is the same). And with the textures is normal, and what the background affects the speed, I do not understand.
And you wonder about the futility of textural background. I am not an ophthalmologist and clear arguments can not lead, but then I read an article on the criteria for the selection of foreground and background colors (though the monitor rather than on the PDA) for an optimal view. Unfortunately I find an article or how I can not, but in general the recommendations there were: at very low and bright ambient light to use "vyvorotki" (dark background, light symbols) at normal soft light background and contrasting to the background characters with different widths between them . Background in both cases be inhomogeneous, with small repetitive structure. For each optimum ratio individually, but it is nice, that is, comfortable to the eye and will cause the least fatigue for prolonged reading.
By the way, it was for this reason that I switched from iSilo to uBook. But since got used to a smooth autoscroll, I had to go back. And now, about happiness, thanks to the author of the subject, I have both a textural background and a smooth human scroll, not to mention other goodies. : yahoo:
And further. When playing with the backgrounds, I realized that the visual effect of the textures is completely different with the usual paging with the joystick and with the auto-scroll (namely smooth). Those. only with autoscrolling is the effect achieved that the text is actually printed on paper, wood, fabric, etc. In statics, this is not achieved IMHO. However, this does not change the usefulness of the texture background for the eyes. But apparently, due to the unpopularity of a smooth autoscroll, not everyone can appreciate the full charm of a heterogeneous background. : cry:
For connoisseurs I offer more than 100 blanks.
Attached files
textures_Al.rar(4.27 MB)