Vorken @ 08.24.06 18:01:33
and it’s better to take at least 520 watts
It’s not easy to find them. Yes and no need.
PEKTIN @ 08.24.06 18:04:42
I most likely will not overclock ... And how much do expensive Asus motherboards cost?
Stupidity. If you can get 150% stable performance without adding anything, then why not? And the mother is from 150 to 250. The one I indicated is oriented towards overclocking. There, even in the BIOS, there are settings for lamers - 5%, 10% and so on. Itself knows how to accelerate it to the limit during peak loads, the rest of the time to reduce the frequency and multiplier. On the remote control, there seems to be a button for it, when pressed, the system unit will quiet down - the speed of the screw will decrease, and so on, you can raise the volume, pause. Very comfortable and unique thing. In addition, mom supports future 4-core. In general, not for a year or two.
IMHO, Conroy without acceleration - money down the drain.
I completely agree. Without overclocking, cheaper stumps and athletes can beat him.
Not really. Depends on the mother. P5W DH deluxe will not become obsolete for a couple of years at least. Until a new socket is invented.
Vorken @ 08.24.06 18:01:33
my choice is e6600. and cache more. and the multiplier is higher. and the price is not so off scale.
It is much more expensive. And cache has little effect on performance - a fact. At least, konroev. My choice is E6400. Perhaps I will take it if it appears in the coming days. If not, it doesn't matter.