[X]Assistant

[Solar_x]

The streets of old Europe
P.S. To moderators. There is a proposal to create a branch called "Travel" or "Travel Notes" - the name is not important, but I think the topic is understandable.

Post has been editedSolar_x - 08.02.09, 19:24

[elite]

Lantern male monastery


Post has been editedelite - 08.02.09, 20:28

[plab]

m1kle @ 5.2.2009, 21:25

As the moderator advised me, I open a separate topic. Very interesting your opinion about my work. Relatively recently opened a new exhibition "Lanterns" (http://m1kle.ru/gallery/album.php?al=1).Thank you in advance.

I didn’t like it, in my opinion I should have paid more attention to cropping, and it would not hurt in some cases, for example, to use an 8-ray star filter

[kochrob]

elite @ 8.2.2009, 20:25

Lantern male monastery

Where is the monastery?

[elite]

Kochrob @ 8.2.2009, 16:07

Where is the monastery?

Monastery in Bakhchisarai. In the background is the cattle yard of the monastery. The monastery itself lay in another branch.

[Milka]

Moscow lights

Attached images

Post has been editedMilka - 15.02.09, 23:20

[dama]

Milka @ 9.2.2009, 15:21

Moscow lights

I like. Did the color turn out this way, or did you put your hand on it? :-)

[Milka]

dama @ 9.2.2009, 17:17

I like. Did the color turn out this way, or did you put your hand on it? :-)

thank! a little bit in Photoshop I corrected the light and shadow when I converted it from the RAW, the color was: yes2:: rolleyes:

[dama]

Milka @ 9.2.2009, 16:25

the light and shadow corrected

Better late than never, learn how to handle ... (-;

[Solar_x]

Milka @ 9.2.2009, 16:21

Moscow lights

from the side grows a pole, cut off by the left edge. Why is he - it is not clear.

Post has been editedSolar_x - 10.02.09, 06:41

[kochrob]

Solar_x @ 10.2.2009, 6:41

Why is he - it is not clear.

He stands there, really, he is out of place. But the photo is good. I liked it very much.
m1kle
The fact that your lights are not all liked, is not a reason to organize offtopic and holivar about creativity in photoshop. You can consider this as an ORAL WARNING!

m1kle @ 10.2.2009, 18:16

inconvenient to place 3 photos at once

A good photographer, among other things, knows how to choose the most valuable of the pile of photos that he has filmed. Sheets of prints leave a sense of photobliss, but not the skill. There is such a concept photo series, in which the pictures illustrate a certain idea. creating a series is sometimes more difficult than choosing a single photo.

[elite]

Milka @ 9.2.2009, 7:21

Moscow lights

Interesting work (especially in such weather conditions).
Processing in the subject.

[Milka]

dama @ 9.2.2009, 17:41

Better late than never, learn how to handle ... (-;

taa, if you don’t call me)): blush:

Solar_x @ 10.2.2009, 6:41

from the side grows a pole, cut off by the left edge. Why is he - it is not clear.

Thanks, really, I didn’t even see it. corrected

Kochrob @ 10.2.2009, 19:32

He stands there, really, he is out of place. But the photo is good. I liked it very much.
m1kle

corrected. thank!

elite @ 10.2.2009, 23:02

Interesting work (especially in such weather conditions).
Processing in the subject.

it froze and froze, my fingers froze.), but in such conditions a frame is more interesting. thank you

Post has been editedMilka - 11.02.09, 01:32

[kochrob]

Milka
Ha, and the post was needed, it turns out. Without it, the symmetry immediately came out and the background became unbalanced. With the advice turned out as in the cartoon: "The landscape is good, but I can not see the Nile." If not difficult, put both versions side by side.

[Solar_x]

the taste and color ... for me - so even with a pillar, even without - not hooked. it seems like everything is in place and in accordance with the theme, but ... a lantern and everything "IMHO" I will not write - this is my and only my opinion.

[kochrob]

elite,
I want to remind that photos are discussed here, but opinions about them.

[Milka]

Solar_x @ 14.2.2009, 16:44

the taste and color ... for me - so even with a pillar, even without - not hooked.

Yes, you are right, maybe it will be more interesting

Attached images

[Solar_x]

Yes, this shot is really better! There is a perspective: the diagonals of the lights successfully lead the eye deep into the scene. I am not familiar with the place, but I think there was an opportunity to take a step to the right, having slightly changed the shooting point - this would have more strongly emphasized the left row-diagonal of the lanterns. There is a small block of horizon to the left (vertical lampposts). And, probably, it was worth making the frame differently: either the blur bar is thinner, or without it at all - just a thin, several pixels, frame-rectangle without shadows and extrusions. In general - a good frame, would put 4 + on a five-point scale :-)

Post has been editedSolar_x - 16.02.09, 06:36

[Milka]

Solar_x @ 16.2.2009, 6:33

I would put 4+ on a five-point scale :-)

Thank you very much for the rating! and for parsing! as if looking at your picture with completely different eyes and you see it in a completely different way. I agree in everything, I will take into account in the future: thank_you:

Post has been editedMilka - 17.02.09, 01:42

[Prototip]

Lantern with playpens.



Post has been editedPrototip - 23.02.09, 12:41