indigo256 ,
Thanks for the tip. I bank on the anchor with IQ technology. Can it damage the device? I even fast charging is not so important.

LYYNX , It should not be, it is best to bypass the QC side, but I recommend to check the table Nathan K

indigo256 , Thanks again for the Old pro feykovye review.
I did not wait for this miracle of the tread. Looked trades than store - the same glass with 300+ feykovye review.
Turned to Amazon, said that money back without returning the goods

Good morning, comrades.
Ordered a glass that'sPixel 2 Xl Glass. It approached 100%. I used to beGlass Pixel 2 XLBut this glass was then a narrow and immediately gaining the air for themselves.

I decided to measure the data transfer rate for a variety of cable for computer (usb 3.0) on the smartphone and compared with usb 2.0 devices.
Special prog for measuring the speed of the PC connected to the phone is not found, so the use of a timer and a movie file.
1498MB file

Cable ugreen A to C 50cm and Pixel 2 ----->0m21s ~ 71MB / a
Sony microUSB cable through the adapter for type C and Pixel 2 ----->0m44s ~ 34MB / a
Xiaomi microUSB cable from banks through an adapter for type C and Pixel 2 ----->0m46s ~ 32MB / a

Cable and Sony xperia z1c (2014) ----->2m57s ~ 8MB / a
Xiaomi microUSB cable from banks and xperia z1c (2014) ----->2m50s ~ 8MB / a
And Sony xperia x cable (2016) ----->1m16s ~ 19MB / a


c to c from cable set not a test because there is no adapter. It would be interesting if someone froze.

wmcdrugs,
You can link to Ugreen cable?

kosteash , At the office. Online there is no such kind of glass - there is no rounding.
This is the original?
Completely closes the screen with all rounded?

kosteash
And you can count phone with glass?

Also came with this glass. Already less than 3 bucks stoit.Kuda and some cherished words to say that money back?

I just wrote in the Live chat, said a place feykovye reviews. They replied that no problems will return the money and arrange free return shipping.
But I replied that the possibility of no return, they agreed to return the money without the return of the glass.
I come, I certainly see how it's awful. But real reviews scare.

I bought a charger in the German Store. The money came from 4464 rubles intermediary services.
Model TC G1000-EU (3A, 5B, 9B 2A)

The car is used here is a charger from Choetech (Quick Charge 3.0, Output:. 3.6-5.5 The 2.4A (max) 5.6-9 In 2A (max), 9.1-12 In 1.5A (max)..). It charges very quickly. It works fine, despite concerns indigo256 .

In addition, there is a Quick Charge 2.0 on Nexus 5X (5V 3A), also charges, he says "fast charging", but the time has not yet compared.

Ali has many chargers with PD, write out "5V-3A, 9V-2A, 12V-1.5A" (even some still add 20 V / 1.5A). I do not see a fundamental difference from QC3.0, except that the charger is not in the original 12 volts and above. But I think it is 12 volts and should not move until the phone that do not ask.
More herein write that PD technology is also compatible with QC 3.0 (5 / 3A 9 / 2A 12V / 1.5A) (i.e. the device can be recharged by the charger QC 3.0 PD, but on the contrary supposedly impossible)
QC 4.0 is already fully compatible with the PD.

Post has been editeddexxxqqq - 07.12.17, 22:01

hawkat
I have just completed a chat. Also promised to return the money and understand the situation. But in the afternoon for some reason we could not agree.

And from guglstora someone ordered the glass?

dexxxqqq,
Also in doubt with this the PD, revered internet, plusTyk. As a result, in practice, it was tested firstThis chargeBut it is not suitable for charging the phone starts wildly troit, ghosting, etc. It was decided to orderTHIS. When charging shows Fast charge, no glitches are not present, is stable, charges feels as fast as regular adapter. The machine is usedTHISIt charges the same without glitches.
Well, in the load tookfor a computer cable, Potestit from 5x that was either not suitable or broken, because somehow it is not working well.

Post has been editedMrDIMT - 07.12.17, 23:12

Yes, I have there, a pixel is not XL. Compatible ideal, and in general enjoy the pleasant, but such technology itself, I think. Adhesives only the contour, ie, between the display and the glass there is a theoretical air gap, it is not there in principle, but I've heard stories about that in due course there gets fine dust / sand and can get scratched. If you press a finger in the speaker, the audible clicks, which also does not inspire confidence. Likely to vary, as will be plenty to choose from. $ 40 is not worth it, I do not understand how such a price.
UPD:Add a photo.

Post has been editedratatat - 08.12.17, 22:53

MrDIMT,
I am also pleased choetech
Under PD have appearedsuch charge, however there is only a US plug.
Car also lay out his,here

To 5X in due time also scored cables choetech (type A-C and type C-C) of different lengths. The same quality as the original. Checker check for passed (now do not know whether this checker uses all anyone).

And finding someone to Ali normal cable Type-C to Type-C?

007Vendetta007,

The cable is not?

It's here isglassand here is such acase.
On the quality of the glass while I can not say strongly believe the pictures from the site is not necessary, since the indentation from the edge more than in the picture. But the case is very good, the only thing that the buttons felt bad ...

defun, ordered like glass . Did not like, do not completely cover the screen, the edges are not pasted, covers one of the speakers is not displaced. How to paste, sfotkatsya the result.