I was wrong. For some reason, I decided that the pixel attenuation time was the same as the time of his ignition. In fact, the attenuation time of the pixel is negligible. I'm fixed.
LG OLED C9 (Consider all OLED TVs from LG at least the last two generations, eighth and ninth, because Matrixes are the same) The transition time of the switch from 0 to 100% brightness takes 8.6 ms, from 100% to zero - 0.3 ms. Total time sling for gray 8.9 ms. LG itself declares the response time for gray 1 ms. Please note that in both cases the unreal time is measured (for black), i.e. Real response time is unknown and more. The numbers are different, because neither LG nor rtings.com defines what is "gray" color. Those. You can take any color to get a comfortable digit.
LCD TV SAMSUNG Q70 The crystal transition time from 0 to 100% brightness of 12.7 ms, from 100% to zero - 6 ms. Total time sling for gray 18.7 ms. Again, real time is non-color, for black, actually more.

New, what are these?

Those. OLED with HDR has 10 bit matrices, and without HDR 8-bit?

If you feed on a TV picture from a computer with HDMI 2.1 support exceptionally resolution 4K and 120 frames / s, then the processor will not affect the quality. If the quality is worse, the TV processor automatically tries to inform the picture to the quality of the TV and there the power of iron and software algorithms are very strongly affected by the quality of the dynamic picture.

Post has been editedSemyon - 12.01.20, 17:29

All the glands have a full-fledged 10bit, in the LCD all the TVs that are in the voting in the lower list (initial premium, premium, glade) are also all with a full-fledged 10bit matrix.

Today, once again went shopping electronics in order to compare pictures live. SAMSUNG Q70R once again killed dull. The colors are not so rich and bright as on the analogues. But I saw just incredibly bright, juicy and beautiful picture on Sony KD-55XG9505. Against the background of his analogues, he looked just perfect. Everywhere the same media files were spinning and it turned out almost all models. But unfortunately on Q80 and Q90, they circled their hellish nuclear acid advertising, which even was unpleasant from poisonousness. But the XG9505 showed even better than his neighboring ace from the same Sony. White is perfectly white, black - there was a little worse than the deeds (with bright lighting is not noticeable at all). I didn't find such a rtering for such a rut, maybe it is x950g? From Old B9, it will still have to abandon a number of reasons - the main thing is that the TV is included almost 16 hours a day (as a background) - and this is practically murder for the Old. As a result, the question is - XG9505 or Q80 - who could compare on them in living the same content? I have already had several people to say that the ChP9505 is the "murderer of Olownov." In part, it is true, but I want alive comparison with Q80. Who saw Schypal, compared?

Good day. For a long time I use an ancient viewsonic monitor with a non-standard resolution of 1680x1050 for Xiaomi Mi Box S, which is not supported by the HDMI-D-Sub adapter, and I want to change on TV 32 "(more accurately do not need to be a close distance and limited space at the location site).
SMART TV, support for different digital broadcasting standards, satellite TV, etc. Absolutely uninteresting, will be used exclusively Xiaomi Mi Box S. Sound - output via cable on columns 2.1, or the sound of the TV itself, or the Soundbar. Basic requirements - the best price-quality ratio when resolving Full HD, the minimum framework and the possibility of mounting on the wall (best of all VESA 100x100) Since it seems such already there, and the holes are not necessary to drill. The price limit is $ 250, I do not see the point of paying more for such a diagonal. In any other case, I would be leaning towards Xiaomi, but in 32 "I don't see anything suitable, and I don't need ART. While I stayed at Philips 32PFS5803, but I'm not sure. With caution I look at different MANTA, at least we have and we have Produce and reviews are not bad, and the price is commensurate with an average account in a restaurant for two pairs. Advise something. I will buy in Poland, maybe there is a difference in the availability of models, but nevertheless

Good day.

Curved feedback about TV and completely confused:

We need a TV strictly 49-50 inches.
Price: in the area 85 K + -.

Task for TV:
FIFA on PS4 - 30% time;
Cinema in OKKO, Apple TV - 50% of the time;
View football on IPTV - 20% of time.

Desire: so that the picture in football and cinema was smooth and juicy.
It is desirable that the TV was relevant for 3-4 years.

Stopped on LG 49SM9000, Samsung 49Q70R, Sony 9005.

Looked in M-video. Just stood 3 nearby. In the store, the brightness of Samsung really liked, and LH seemed dimly.
I understand that this can be a trick of a store and different modes, so I ask for help knowing.

Question:
1. If you get distracted from the price, what will you advise? Perhaps there are other models of these brands at this price, but such as these latest models.
2. How many are 60 hertz in 49 inches in Samsung?

I want the TV to not lose relevance in 3 years.

how I wrote nonsense is all dynamic, static HDR, only on paper is beautifully all from Dolby Vision, well, of course, you need all the manufacturers how to encourage you to pay for the same thing that was in HDR10 and for free, and you need to pay from each TV So that only beautiful bugging on the box from TV is drawn in the form of Dolby Vision and Khomethoy Seeing this without thinking did it buy such, even the most budget TV.
The most important thing in HDR is a good implementation and so that the TV in its parameters could display this beauty, for example, the Christopher Nolana (InterStellar, Dunkirk and his other films) look great in the usual HDR, not even HDR10 and better actually any movie in Dolby Vision or HDR10 +, I still specifically downloaded Godzilla separately in the usual HDR10 and HDR10 + and decided to check whether experts really are right that the difference is not to see between HDR10, HDR10 + and Dolby Vision and really compared in different scenes, the difference is not visible, for the people we have a budget A TV on a 8bit (FRC) matrix, with a contrast of 1000 and a brightness of 350kdm, but necessarily from Dolby Vivito and at the same time they see what this dolby is awesome, funny of course.
In general, Samsung can be right that they did not peck on an afild with Dobby Vivita and did not give 3 bucks from the Dolby TV, but they were told if you need HDR10 +, use for free if necessary, the only advantage of Dobby Vibissa, as I wrote on The future is 12bit color and support for brightness peaks up to 10,000 cdm.

Post has been editedOrbitex - 12.01.20, 22:35

take a 32 "monitor, it will be the best option

From reviews on Yandex Market:
Those. The matrix can have a TV and good. But it is made only for a high-quality source. For example, in Russia 720p and above is no more than 20% of the total broadcasting.
Plus, from the same reviews, the obvious thing for the modern LCD of the TV with the function of automatic local illumination adjustment is the neon effect. So the "OLED killer" is too strongly said, especially with regard to prices. If only it is not fundamentally to have exactly Sony.

Post has been editedSemyon - 12.01.20, 19:06

Eh, we would have been hanging at least 2% at 720 ..... Cable domroom declares dozens of channels in ND and in fact, only channels about nature and musical, although this is completely enough, Zombolypt has long stopped cling, Only in the internet and read about nightingale litter and jelly in the head. Sorry for the flood ....

I can't make myself at a 55 inch TV watch the essential soap (I'm about the signal quality). All-all channels are available via IPTV in better quality. You can also watch for free.
Grandma can and watch and then I almost convinced her always through MTS TV watch))

This applies to all TV, the apscale in all modern TVs in the same class works at about the same level, as confirmation - assessments by apskail on Rating.
Shit 480r Picture or Ether will remain a shit at least on a deed, even at ZG9, there are only any processors of the future with a hardware neural network will be able to pull the bad picture to acceptable.
A high-quality source, as it is implied initially from manufacturers, no one else thinks about lovers of DVDRip. For me, it was a very big unpleasant revelation, as my deed showed me a series of the game of the thrones of the last season, when the walkers took the castle at night, I didn't go from the eye - I didn't go wrong - the color banding was so terrible, it seemed that the box had moved to 256 Flowers, in dark places, pixel porridge lived his life, with any settings, it was impossible to see anything on the screen. Then it turned out that this problem was touched by many viewers, the campaign of the Stringing services cut off the bitrate of the series expecting a record load of their channels due to the insane stir around the Sagi final, even the director or operator was given their comments after that, why in this series was so bad with a picture . Fortunately, the content of such terrible quality no longer came across (simple ether at once looks better in comparison with the misunderstanding), with high-quality content all the fire.

I do not think. In this price range I find only a couple of models, and extra opportunities in the form of tuners, the speakers will not interfere. Given that this monitor has worked with breaks for years so 12-13, then the TV will not be purchased for one year. You never know why it is necessary, but the monitor has limited functionality, and even for a possible subsequent sale will not be so attractive as the TV. And yes, I would be glad to get rid of Logitech acoustics, which in the activity of the console does not publish any sounds, and if the latter sleeps, then the "click", especially at night, periodically hear. Even the smart Xiaomi outlet was hanging there to disconnect the nafig speakers. Therefore, TV with built-in speakers is more attractive than the current solution.

Of these three in 49, Sony 9005 is preferred diagonally.

Maybe there is such a TVHisense H43B7300.How can he take?

That trash that is now collecting in 32 "nafig will not need will be needed in a couple of years. And, given the price, it will be possible to sell it for a maximum of 20-30 $.
If you need a straight 32 ", then you need to search for avito and other flea markets. For example, Sony 32Ex402.
There are speakers and in monitors.
Your business, I just expressed my opinion.

Post has been editedjimm_xattab - 12.01.20, 20:04

Prompt, plizstrategy TV selection with such data:

1) I'm just going to use a TV console on Android (I look at NVIDIA SHIELD PRO 2019),
2) a TV cell is 49-55 inches, but there are practically no smart functions without smart functions,
3) be sure to 4k,
4) TV is not for games, but for movies + to view content from the computer and from the card / disk.

Questions: Because you have to choose from TV with smart, then:
1) How do I understand, take a TV on android optional?
2) What functions can you donate to minimize the price, given the availability of the prefix?
: thank_you:

Post has been editedSova_007 - 12.01.20, 20:14

Therefore, in tests at LG OLED C9https://i.rtings.com/i...ponse-time-2-large.jpgResponse time 8.6 ms, and already in the review of the TV itself:
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c9-otal
in which referenced to the tests, indicated 2.4 ms.
Authority also does not add to the fact that they do not explain what is "gray" and do not test real-time response BTB.
And then the manufacturers completely relaxed. At first, it began to count the time slightly on the wrong method (convenient), and now it does not indicate it at all. Apparently, that people do not ohrenel from what crap they sell for 100 thousand.

Let's talk more specifically. Do you refute the following phrase?

What is the best? 4K 120 frames / s? It is clear that there is no speech on the analog broadcasting on such TVs. Only available in Russia DVB-T2, DVB-C and IPTV. So, just in them 80% of the channels, though as 3 times better than analog broadcasting, but still resolution less than 1280x720 (HD). Those., If you consider feedback on the Yandex Marktheet authoritative, all these 80% of the channels are impossible to look at Sony XG9505.
Let's not confuse all IPTV (digital television) with high definition television (HD and higher). Here Sony decided that below the HD does not even need to support, and at the same time, we do not have more than 20%. And the forum users write that even worse (apparently in other countries):
I have MTS TV. If you drop advertising and duplicate channels, there will be about 110 channels. Well, somewhere 20 of them in HD and FULL HD, the rest is lower.

jimm_xattab Yes, I am absolutely indifferent to me, for how much it will be possible to sell it in a couple of years. Show me a used Full HD TV with a two-year old ago for $ 20-30, I'm ready to buy. Any better temporary option with an old monitor
Here you propose to take a monitor, and at least some kind of diagonal model tell me?

Well, I will not fit into the appendix walls of something more, even 40 "I suppose will be over the edge, and the viewer's eyes are just two meters, so" direct 32 "". In addition, I pointed out that I would buy in Poland. Depending on the prices and / or availability of a particular model, I will buy either in the offline store or in the online store. This is also a temporary option may be half a year or a year, so I do not plan to spend a decent amount sufficiently indicated above

Yes, definitely. The operating system only affects smart functions, they are in separate piece

All, besides quality picture. For you the main thing so that there is a normal HDMI. 4K, HDR and full-path with a local darkening - are probably now key functions.