Rep: (2244)
* Sha.man , I just read your posts in the subject, no more. 1. You supposedly searched somewhere there, asked a question, a week later informed us that you found the answer in the official resources of the program. 2. You asked a question in the topic, they answered you, you continued to ask. After these two cases, you can assure us of anything, your posts speak for themselves.
Something like this.



Rep: (2244)
* Insanecat , clean if necessary. And here, such a variety of proposals are meaningless.



Rep: (2244)
* newAid I do not see any "battery set mode" in automagic. Neither among actions, nor among triggers / conditions.
* B-roman , action Init Variable Package Info.
* Sha.man , I summarize your ordeals: if you do not read the written, the decision of even the simplest Wishlist will take at least a week. For planner programs, reading official resources is a must; it is almost always the key to success.



Rep: (2244)
* xX_NICK_Xx , 1. Ek, where you suffered. But was the plugin or input insufficient? I will not believe. 2. In stdout, stderr see. You do not have a root, most likely.
* xX_NICK_Xx , 3. Not all output from getevent should be reproduced via sendevent. For example, there are sync codes. Take off through getevent the sequence that you are now generating through sendevent. Do both sequences match? That's it. Therefore, the problem with "conversion" is not at all the differences in the presentation of codes. Those who master code generation are able to convert from one number system to another. And whoever does not master, automate the transformation, do not automate ...
* Huly gan , MSC 3.
* d_dred , topic rules, p. 7, remove Run Log and logcat.
* som_bbs , not, "forgotten" in this case one thing: Section 7 of the rules of the topic. Rather, they did not forget, but deliberately and defiantly ignored. As a result, they got nonsense instead of advice. Well, that was what was intended.



Rep: (2244)
* androtester , 1. "when thousands of iterations in the end", change the algorithm, less often - a programming language. Each tool is good in its place. 2. No need to fantasize, measure the execution time. There should not be such significant losses.



Rep: (2244)
* Insanecat If the programs differ essentially only in names and nonsense wallpapers, it is unlikely that one of them can be called exotic, even if it has not been updated for a long time. No need to follow the path of the Adepts Sect SuperSU Almighty, this will only harm. Ruth is either there or not; there is no third. The specific implementation of the root rights management program is not important.



Rep: (2244)
* EMcyxapu , 1. I explain: once upon a time the topic was occupied by supersu fanboys. No magic then existed, by the way. 2. There has never been any sense in the fragment you quoted, and there is no now, therefore, there are no explanations in the FAQ. In general, there is nonsense in the cap of any long-lived topic, this is not normal, but this is life. Therefore, any information must be checked by internal filters for meaningfulness.

Posted on 08/16/2019, 12:26:

* Insanecat what superuser is exotic? Given that the main code is magisk, it is inherited from superuser. For nowhere else is there.



Rep: (2244)
* androtester , 1. "Strongly" is unlikely, but it will be a little faster. 2. The first fragment - 1 system call "wait for the descendant return code", which is executed in any case. The second is the formation and writing to the standard output of the lines, their reading from the standard input, calling the function by the interpreter, comparing the lines. In principle, there is overhead, but they are almost always neglected.



Rep: (2244)
* Aleksandr27 , "shortcuts / badges" - part of the launcher, learn how and where your launcher stores information about them.
* xynta123 , 1. "in his spirit" to simplify the life of himself and ordinary users, and not everyone curious there. For it is fair. 2. shared_prefs - persistent store, cache; real data is inside the application (i.e., it is located in the virtual memory of the process in which the java-machine that runs the application functions). Like any persistent store in Android, this is taken into account only when the application is launched, it is updated on major holidays. Changing shared_prefs with a live application java machine is pointless.

Post has been editedusername11 - 14.08.19, 11:11



Rep: (2244)
* 1ncogn1too , for Android 2.3 - IWifiManager.setWifiApEnabled (). Call rules see in the source application settings. You will not pass any objects through a service call, but you don’t need to, pass null.
* Morpheus68 , the error speaks for itself, not? Look at the file permissions.

Post has been editedusername11 - 14.08.19, 11:05



Rep: (2244)
* Slevest , 1. And what has already happened? Lay out the developments, look in the subject, how others who receive help do it. 2. Network interface management - ifconfig, ip, ndc utilities.
* fedor5800 , the Show Custom Widget Overlay action, there is an option for an arbitrary location.
* newAid , nothing is clear, reformulate with detailed details.



Rep: (2244)
* davdima , 1. Prices - FAQ 7. 2. Help - topic rules, p. 7. 3. Understanding - the rules of the topic, paragraph 4.
* xX_NICK_Xx Ministry of Agriculture 2.



Rep: (2244)
* 1ncogn1too , well, yes, Android 2.3 is a 32-bit system, you can transfer a pointer in the form of i32. Yes, there, and service did not yet have a type of "pointer".



Rep: (2244)
Uh, how much have been flooded. And the question is not worth a damn, just ask a little about how Android works.
About Android ID on Android 8+
Android ID - an entry in the Android settings provider’s database, the storage method is no different from other settings provider’s records, for example, from the entries “debugging by adb is enabled”, “bluetooth is enabled”, “allow installing applications from untrusted sources”, etc., thousands their.
The formal description of this entry in the source code of Android:
A 64-bit number (as a hex string) that is randomly generated when the user first sets up the device and should remain constant for the lifetime of the user's device. The value may change if a factory reset is performed on the device.
When a device has multiple users (available on certain devices running Android 4.2 or higher), each user appears as a completely separate device, so the ANDROID_ID value is unique to each user.
I don’t think that this requires translation, the text is simple, the Google translator will master it for those who do not speak the language of the technological leader. I will explain only the last paragraph.
Starting with Android 4.2, the system has become multi-user, and Android ID has become a unique identifier for each user in the system. Nevertheless, since each user has their own settings provider database (strictly speaking, only part of this database, but this is not essential), the Android ID can be saved and restored for each user individually (the last operation, as you understand, is simply changing the corresponding record in base).
However, starting with Android 8, Android ID is unique not only for each user, but also for each application. Details are in the blog of Android developers,https: //android-develo...ce-identifiers-in.html
Therefore, the concept of Android ID as a unique identifier has lost its meaning. A set of unique identifiers (one for each application) is still stored with the settings provider, however, the global system Android ID is also. Those who are dear to him can be saved / restored (in addition to pleasant memories, there is no other meaning in this operation).

Post has been editedusername11 - 12.08.19, 17:03



Rep: (2244)
* Sluap , 1. Dig in the direction of FAQ 15. You have a Tasker being nailed, moreover, in an unnatural way. And in your Android there is a bug whose symptoms you have described quite accurately.
* Sluap , 2. You are trying to reduce the consequences, and you need to correct the cause. You can try to make Tasker supposedly systemic, you can fuss differently, it's all a waste of time. Until Tasker stops killing, happiness will not come.



Rep: (2244)
* serafim22 , 1. Well, yes, somehow it should be done. While your train of thought is correct. 2. You have no errors in the log, the thread has successfully completed. 2. "Nothing happens" does not tell us anything.



Rep: (2244)
* Freeunion , search the topic for the keyword inotificationmanager. Yes, we don’t need to tell us whether you will "bother", it doesn’t interest anyone here, offtopic.
* Elkaydar , can. If you want to talk about this, read paragraph 7 of the rules of the topic.
* Anakgh Ministry of Agriculture 12.

Post has been editedusername11 - 11.08.19, 17:23



Rep: (2244)
* serafim22 , and something happened? Lay out your achievements (see how others who receive help in the topic do this), help to complete it.



Rep: (2244)
* Raveh To completely close this question for yourself, go to the topic "The Linux Kernel from the Inside", there read the article on root from the header.



Rep: (2244)
* 1@1 , 1. Real help will come after completing paragraph 7 of the rules of the topic. 2. Science - The course of a young fighter (paragraph 4. of the rules of the topic). 3. The phrase
1@1 @ 09.08.19, 15:11 *
Search in the topic, unfortunately, did not help
regulated by paragraph 2 of the rules of the topic.

Full version

Help     rules

Now: 08/17/19, 00:21