Deonys @ 09/13/19, 2:45
3D seems to be called nonsense by people who did not try these "oysters" or had the misfortune to "poison" them with a not very good technique.
This phrase was especially liked (no jokes). : rofl: Trying to watch 3D on what the devilвЂ™s technique, some in general in anaglyph, and then shout at the whole Internet that 3D crap .. Up to 90 percent of such вЂњreviewsвЂќ including special ones. 3D viewing and customization forums. On the same trunk of such nonsense you read that all desire to get involved with 3D will disappear. Plus the zombies of manufacturers stopping the production of TV, and it is not surprising that now the majority has such an opinion. All in all, you need to understand the principle of action a little bit, to buy not just any equipment, but the "right" one - and a cool effect is ensured. But our people are "dark", laziness is sorted out, itвЂ™s easier to say that this is shit and thatвЂ™s all .. Well, the dog is with them, with the wretched .. As for TVs: Yes, of course, I would be crushed by a toad to pay almost a million for a TV with a large diagonal. And the projector is in the area of вЂ‹вЂ‹fifty dollars. The main disadvantage of TV is the large inertia of liquid crystals, as a result of which the matrix performance is low, the response time reaches 50-60 ms, which is very critical for 3D. Also, screen illumination in different places and low frame rate. From here comes ghosting and other artifacts. Correct projector with real 144 Hz. not subject to this. That is why the projector is better and more suitable for 3D! I donвЂ™t know how on TV for a lemon (it seems that the laws of physics are the same), but I watched several TVs, a 3D comp.monitor with a matrix of 120 Hz and a response time of 2 ms, and now the projector. TV is in last place, on it really eyes get tired. You look at the projector for hours and there is no fatigue. If there is a difference with TV, then it is almost imperceptible. Here play a role glasses taking about 30 percent of the brightness. And as a result, the picture between the projector and the TV is equalized (specifically for 3D). That is why the room can not be prepared, glasses cutting brightness eliminate all reflections, the black level becomes very deep, the picture is just class! In general, you need a balanced system with a good margin of brightness, with a high frame rate, DLP, etc. Only then will there be a вЂњWowвЂќ effect, several times superior to 4K. This is the opinion of my acquaintances who watched my 3D, and said, вЂњThis is cool, they didnвЂ™t even expect it!вЂќ Price tag: Projector 45p, screen 120 "with electric drive 13p, HDMI 2.0 cable. 10 meters 2350r, glasses 1200r. Just about 60 p. Is inexpensive! And all the" arguments "against in the posts above are nothing more than speculation , based on the opinion of not very smart people from the Internet. (We heard a jingle, but I donвЂ™t know where it is!): DPost has been editedswxswl - 13.09.19, 10:42