The G7 in the foreground has a transport with good illumination, hence the low visibility of the background and the glare of white stripes on the zebra. In all the pictures, why should people allow dust in their eyes?
Vredny86 What Leshem "foreground"? Do you even know what the FRONT PLAN is, eh?
In the foreground here is ZEBRA, and the device takes an exposure on it. The exposition is taken by the CENTRO-EXTENDED. You know what that means? - I guess that there isn’t (otherwise they wouldn't have performed so perpendicularly). I explain:
The exposition is set on the center of the frame with a small weight of the periphery of the frame. And the farther from the center point is the same bus, the less weight it brings to the result. And in the center there is ZEBRA and it is really on the FRONT plan of the frame, unlike the bus, which is on the REVERSE plan. As for the bus, it is a gastolko far from the center, that its contribution to the exposition is minimal! The exposition of the device EXPOSED ON ZEBRA.
See:
Red here highlighted the area that with Centro-Weighted metering affects the exposure, and all that is in favor - can be neglected.
---
Well, well, since you thought I’ve let people get their eyes on the dust, we open our eyes wider and we’re looking at these two frames from the drain (first g7 +, second s10 +) taken at the same time without fear of “dust” :
And that HERE now prevented g7 from being outsiders ?? BUT?
Also “dust” in the form of red stacks lit in the distance ?, - so this is no longer on the ski frame, but on the Samsung frame)).
---
Are you even in the subject with such strange statements ...? : shok:
Post has been editedsparta - 18.07.19, 18:59