Messagessavagemessiahzine.com
Reputation exhibited user
cool.dolphin1It abolished moderated as a violation of paragraph 5 of the resource rules.
I think this action is wrong moderator. Motivation invoice minus in reputation was not based on personal animosity to the author of this message here:
cool.dolphin1 @ 01.10.19, 20:16
Owners can Hlaomi budget, the smart is not available
Yes, and why not
Sony Xperia 5 (Post cool.dolphin1 # 89414970)My comment to change the reputation of the character:
Thank. It is better to be silent than to say irrelevant, even in such a boorish manner.
Lowering reputation was made on the basis of the evaluation of several messages from the topic to which reference is given above. In particular the user flood offends an indefinite number of users, while its messages are not carried absolutely no payload.
I understand that the reputation of the forum does not set up to determine the personal relations, and to ensure that users have the activity was estimated at its true worth, whatever people can understand whose opinions they read and how much it believes to be trusted. It is because of these reasons I act when raises or lowers the reputation.
I ask the administration to understand the data the improper actions of a moderator.
PS: If the user unnecessarily rude to other users, flood, otherwise clog the resources and violate the rules, as well as introducing other people are misleading, the reflection of the behavior of his reputation is as important as the work of the moderators and facilitators in order to curb the activities infringing rules of the resource.
Addition: This theme is for what? To create the illusion?
TOTAL, the results of the writing of this post: rolleyes::
In addition I returned minus a turnip from a man who, as far as I remember, I put him back with another account. When this message (or rather their series) the above character that offends a large part of members of the forum is still in place. Less because he does not put that I was offended, but because of his behavior degrades the resourcesavagemessiahzine.comIt lowers its quality and shows that the administration turned a blind eye to the behavior of members of the forum with the ugly bloated "reputation."
What can I say, moderation simply fabulous. Fabulous fabulous approval from a moderator.
Maybe things are not important, not only in the mobile industry as a whole (
technology run into the ceiling, to lure buyers increasingly difficult), But alsosavagemessiahzine.com? I hope I'm wrong and the incident only exception to the rule, you never know what life at the moderator happens ..
Everything would be fine if the investigation had been carried out not only in relation to me personally, but also in relation to the person responsible for this "celebration". So far it seems that there is
work in the style of the "siloviki" our immense. Mole just try to take the initiative with regard tolawlessness, arbitrarinesssome "big and special" person, the investigation will hold very quickly, but only in relation to you, and the "big" bespredelschik may even be rewarded, or will improve . Bravosavagemessiahzine.com: clap:
M
Your negative user was deleted by mistake. Reputation restored. You have been removed several alternatives advantages exhibited in the profile and do not contain justification. Type "+", etc. Thank.
Post has been editedqq1978 - 24.10.19, 12:05