d_7 @ 08.06.19, 13:17
I see no reason to overpay for a laptop with i7.
But for real comparison it’s still worth having a device with i7. Otherwise, your comparison does not make sense in the statement above. For example (even in theory): 4 boilers in 8 streams (i5) will always have a capacity of one and a half less than 6/12 (i7), respectively, on a test with the same frequency in the load on all cores under equal conditions.
This is the only way to experience the real power of i7-8750H)d_7 @ 08.06.19, 13:17
I turn off the turbo-booster and the frequencies fall to a permanent 2100, and the FPS in games has not dropped at all ...
On 8th generation processors with power / current throttling, the frequency always drops to the stated operating frequency (in this case, 2.3 GHz-i5 and 2.2 GHz-i7). And in good toys (and in stress tests) throttling will always be. Therefore, FPS in games with / without turbobust is negligible. Although even at frequencies already 2.8-3.0 GHz, this throttling is not observed, but we do not see this, since the frequency immediately drops from the maximum to the operating frequency. I consider disabling the turbo-busts in your version is not advisable, but done differently. Very simple and without installing additional software. Limit the maximum frequency of the processor in games. Read
here. It works on i7. Start with a frequency of 2.6 and slowly raise until you see a drop in performance in games.
It was about processors i5-8300H and i7-8750HPost has been editedelektrikons - 08.06.19, 14:17