Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51
better allocate places by distance
Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51
Because in distance it’s just the same it will be more accurate
What will be more accurate?
Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51
can be divided by small steps of 10 km and the same distance, but by a quick step (the step will be longer) - the total number of steps is less - at the same distance. Here I am talking about.
Since the bracelet does not have gps, it seems that he can determine the distance by the product of the number of steps by the average length of the user's step (depending on the height, frequency of steps, etc.)
So, we can assume that small steps increasing the number of steps also increase the distance traveled, because the bracelet does not see how much distance we go.
Assassin225 @ 10.16.17, 23:51
And physical activity in the second case is greater.
Objectively, the unit load per user should be considered a step, since users of different growths (and, most likely, different step lengths) will walk the same distance with a different number of steps, respectively, getting a different load.
Example:
A participant 2 meters tall (step = 1 meter) will walk 10 km., Completing 10’000 steps.
A participant 1.6 meters tall (step = 0.7 meters) will go the same 10 km, having already completed 14’285 steps.
Or a Participant 1.6 meters tall, having completed 10’000 steps, will pass only 7 km.
In our opinion, both participants will get a more equal load after completing 10’000 steps (albeit a different distance) than by going the same distance but making a significantly different number of steps.
Therefore, we attach ourselves to the step, as a more basic unit of load, and apply the distance for more advanced statistics of each participant.
Everything is quite relative - both steps and kilometers in general show human activity., With an approximate comparison of activity with other participants.
Therefore, we recommend comparing your performance with the best performance of other participants in order to focus on them, improving your achievements.
And also every week try to improve their performance.
For example, because of my high growth and wide step, according to accurate gps data (the quotient of the distance to the number of steps), I have a step of more than 1 meter.
.
For 41 weeks, according to the bracelet, I did:
- 112 thousand steps, but only 88 km passed.
But in fact, 112 thousand steps need to be multiplied by the step length, i.e. in fact, the distance should have been at least 112 km.
In any case, you should not be upset about steps or kilometers - take these indicators as an average indicator of activity - and the more active we are, the better! Posted on 10/17/2017, 11:53: Assassin225 @ 10.17.17, 11:24
distance traveled more. And this is more important
A child 1 meter tall and an uncle 2 meters tall will have different distances to get the same load, taking the same number of steps.