eliy @ 28.10.18, 16:38
4 times per second, and this gives 7500 seconds (seconds, Carl!) Of the device, or 125 minutes or 2ch5min. Turn on the backlight and Bluetooth or vayfay and sit near a wall outlet because the battery will sit down very quickly, hour for 1.5 or even faster ... We want to work in the pampas long? We need a power source. The power supply adds weight with 180gr weight to the tablet or laptop.
Yes, folks ... "Not Guru" there can only be dragged.
DEPUTY Encouraged study the fundamental impossibility - and suddenly - ah-ah-ah! - the first clause: "partial shift".
When the cursor is crawling on the line as he moves faster than the eye? And how many percent of the pixels is enough to replace a full format to reproduce the editing? That's right - the minimum. 0.5%. Even if your 4 times per second is - 2% of the pixels in the second. The rest is generated?
eliy @ 28.10.18, 20:22
If there is even a partial change of image, energy costs enormous.
Above, it seems, it was scientifically and categorically that the six inches can work at least 8 hours but with the weight of a single clay brick?
And suddenly, 13.3 inches and weighs 345 grams. (Well, just exactly like a brick) - a-ah! - no waffles - three weeks. Even despised usual cunning producer ( "Using the Digital device under the following conditions: - Viewing 30 pages of text-based PDF documents for 60 minutes / day - Manual input using the stylus for 1 minute / day.")
at
3 times , get
7 o'clock on the charge. 13.3 "-" Carl "A 6"? This, mind you, not two,
5 times fewer pixels at the same density. "Clara" say?
Where are Your science looks? Oh yes...
eliy @ 28.10.18, 19:23
the accuracy of our estimates are much higher.
: rofl:
Does your idol with a sense of humor and reflection was somehow perceptibly richer ...
As it turned out, marketoluhi decent companies for what they do meet more. Is the classic cutting technology market top layers. Removing foams with professional segments. And as soon as the niche will be close to the filling, will the massive drain in yuzersky-luzersky glass. Then and there will be real competition.
And on the subject:
eliy @ 28.10.18, 20:22
energy costs enormous.
From here a number of favorite rhetorical questions. Is it worth it to spend so much of calories a person on the pathos, so boorish aplomb?
As a classic: "To Whom this creation takes in the sea pose high blood pressure?"
Like the above were: sapienti sat. Friendliness and simplicity saves Megawati.
And without them all this pretryas glands loses meaning and interest. :-)
But for the links and specifics - thank you!
Again - the theme has never - not fateful. No gadget - well, to hell with him. But if profrabotu information through it is possible to improve one iota - all discourage quickly and can be useful to many.
Post has been editedtygos - 28.10.18, 17:46