Frost_Imp @ 10.24.2014, 15:19
Untilboth of us we can only theorize on the legal literacy of the YOTA treaty ..
No, we are not both, I do not need to build theories, I just do a certified lawyer.
On the topic of access to torrents, as I understand, Yota will not be able to not be able, the restrictions go, just just because they want so much, but since they are only a service provider, their actions can be viewed as a violation of the constitutional right to receive information Art. 29, parts 4 and 5. What is already a violation not just consumer rights. Although of course access to torrents, it is strongly said, but on the torrents of various kinds of information is, literature on legislation, educational films, etc.
On the topic of mandatory compliance with the terms of the contract / agreement / transaction, I recommend to familiarize yourself with:
st. 168 parts 1 and 2 of the civil code code
http://www.zakonrf.info/gk/168/about the deal!
st. 422 parts 1 and 2 of the civil code code
http://www.gk-rf.ru/statia422about the contract!
In turn, you can refer to 421 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, on the free conclusion of a contract, but in part 4 of the same article, it is impossible to violate the rights defined by the legislation of one of the parties.
Now, seriously, the rights of citizens in Russia are often violated, it’s not only Yota who’s trying to limit access to torrents without explanation. Large state corporations violate the rights of citizens and not anywhere else, but in employment contracts. Most recently, I helped a comrade to sue Russian Railways under an employment contract, they won, but this giant does not rush all the other railway workers to change contracts to comply with the Labor Code of the Russian Federation.
Why citizens are not suing Yota? Well, because our citizens do not really like to sue anyone who needs to get on torrents and download, they will get.
Post has been editedruslanbag43 - 24.10.14, 16:26